A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity.

RAND Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy 02/2011; 9(1):11-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.02.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Medication nonadherence is a common problem among the elderly.
To conduct a systematic review of the published literature describing potential nonfinancial barriers to medication adherence among the elderly.
The PubMed and PsychINFO databases were searched for articles published in English between January 1998 and January 2010 that (1) described "predictors," "facilitators," or "determinants" of medication adherence or that (2) examined the "relationship" between a specific barrier and adherence for elderly patients (ie, ≥65 years of age) in the United States. A manual search of the reference lists of identified articles and the authors' files and recent review articles was conducted. The search included articles that (1) reviewed specific barriers to medication adherence and did not solely describe nonmodifiable predictors of adherence (eg, demographics, marital status), (2) were not interventions designed to address adherence, (3) defined adherence or compliance and specified its method of measurement, and (4) involved US participants only. Nonsystematic reviews were excluded, as were studies that focused specifically on people who were homeless or substance abusers, or patients with psychotic disorders, tuberculosis, or HIV infection, because of the unique circumstances that surround medication adherence for each of these populations.
Nine studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Four studies used pharmacy records or claims data to assess adherence, 2 studies used pill count or electronic monitoring, and 3 studies used other methods to assess adherence. Substantial heterogeneity existed among the populations studied as well as among the measures of adherence, barriers addressed, and significant findings. Some potential barriers (ie, factors associated with nonadherence) were identified from the studies, including patient-related factors such as disease-related knowledge, health literacy, and cognitive function; drug-related factors such as adverse effects and polypharmacy; and other factors including the patient-provider relationship and various logistical barriers to obtaining medications. None of the reviewed studies examined primary nonadherence or nonpersistence.
Medication nonadherence in the elderly is not well described in the literature, despite being a major cause of morbidity, and thus it is difficult to draw a systematic conclusion on potential barriers based on the current literature. Future research should focus on standardizing medication adherence measurements among the elderly to gain a better understanding of this important issue.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current self-report medication adherence measures often provide heavily skewed results with limited variance, suggesting that most participants are highly adherent. This contrasts with findings from objective adherence measures. We argue that one of the main limitations of these self-report measures is the limited range covered by the behaviors assessed. That is, the items do not match the adherence behaviors that people perform, resulting in a ceiling effect. In this paper, we present a new self-reported medication adherence scale based on the Rasch model approach (the ProMAS), which covers a wide range of adherence behaviors. The ProMAS was tested with 370 elderly receiving medication for chronic conditions. The results indicated that the ProMAS provided adherence scores with sufficient fit to the Rasch model. Furthermore, the ProMAS covered a wider range of adherence behaviors compared to the widely used Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) instrument, resulting in more variance and less skewness in adherence scores. We conclude that the ProMAS is more capable of discriminating between people with different adherence rates than the MARS.
    Patient Preference and Adherence 03/2015; 9:355-67. DOI:10.2147/PPA.S76749 · 1.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On average, Medicare Supplement insureds take about seven unique prescription medications each year, resulting in substantial out-of-pocket drug copayments, in addition to Medicare Supplement and Part D premiums. To help alleviate this financial burden, many individuals resort to cost-saving strategies that are not trackable by Part D insurance plans, likely resulting in an underestimation of medication adherence rates. We aimed to estimate utilization rates of cost-saving strategies, measure member characteristics associated with these strategies and estimate if these strategies are associated with medication adherence. This was a cross-sectional analysis of a 2012-2013 survey of AARP® Medicare Supplement plan insureds with Part D pharmaceutical coverage. The study included 5,784 community-dwelling survey respondents ≥ 65 years of age, living in ten states and with self-reported use of prescription medications. Self-reported use of cost-saving strategies included: obtaining free samples from physicians, splitting pills so medications lasted longer, purchasing medications from other countries and/or over the internet, or purchasing medications through the Veterans Administration. Propensity weighted multivariate regressions were utilized to determine characteristics associated with the use of such strategies and the association with medication adherence as measured from Medicare Part D claims. Among those taking medications, 39.6 % used cost-saving strategies. Those using these strategies were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to be male, non-minority, have more comorbid conditions, have more disabilities and use more medications. Few variables were significantly related to pharmaceutical nonadherence, but those who were nonadherent were significantly more likely to use more medications, split pills, obtain free samples from their physicians and be male. Cost-saving strategies are used extensively as a means to augment Medicare Part D coverage. These strategies are associated with measured medication nonadherence and likely result in underreporting of medication adherence rates. Pharmacy management programs should consider these additional medication sources in assisting plan members to problem solve cost-related medication management issues.
    Journal of General Internal Medicine 02/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11606-015-3196-7 · 3.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a world of immunomodulators and biologics is complex enough, but managing the elderly IBD patient is further confounded by multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy with drug-drug interactions, and cognitive mobility/motility disturbances. Social and insurance coverage issues also always lurk in the background. All of these factors summate into a daunting challenge for the clinician. In this review, we aim to describe important considerations when prescribing to an elderly patient with IBD, taking into account costs of medications, drug interactions, the aging body's effect on pharmacokinetics, and the effect of aging on the immune system. Adverse effects and drug-drug interactions are expounded upon in detail specific for the aging adult with IBD in an effort to assist the clinician in the decision-making process.
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11938-014-0039-2

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014