Article

Innovation Policy Instruments

Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 01/2007;
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The Lisbon Agenda that was launched in 2000, and had a set time-period of ten years. The purpose of the Lisbon Agenda was to make the EU the most competitive, knowledge-based economy in the world, and at the same time preserving, or even improving social cohesion and maintain environmental sustainability. The Lisbon Agenda had a large number of goals, in both quantified and qualified measures, in different areas. The main instrument that was put forward was the open method of co-ordination (OMC) that includes indicators, benchmarking, peer pressure, and best practise demonstrations. The forthcoming Lisbon Agenda will certainly need new approaches, and new instruments. One of the areas of instruments that can be further explored is innovation policies where the use of R&D and human capital is enhanced. Human capital is a natural part of a knowledge-based economy, and has positive impacts on growth, and jobs in the economy. Innovation policy instruments are diversified and are integrated in many areas of an economy and on many levels, which make them ideal for the next Lisbon Agenda. The instruments can have a general or specific characteristics and some span over the two characteristics.

1 Bookmark
 · 
122 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Innovation policies play an important role throughout the development process of emerging industries in China. Existing policy and industry studies view the emergence process as a black-box, and fail to understand the impacts of policy to the process along which it varies. This paper aims to develop a multi-dimensional roadmapping tool to better analyse the dynamics between policy and industrial growth for new industries in China. Through reviewing the emergence process of Chinese wind turbine industry, this paper elaborates how policy and other factors influence the emergence of this industry along this path. Further, this paper generalises some Chinese specifics for the policy-industry dynamics. As a practical output, this study proposes a roadmapping framework that generalises some patterns of policy-industry interactions for the emergence process of new industries in China. This paper will be of interest to policy makers, strategists, investors and industrial experts.
    Int. J. of Environment and Sustainable Development. 01/2013; 12(1):3 - 21.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: At the end of the 20th century, knowledge production has been radically transformed. As knew knowledge economies and US were becoming an increasing threat for EU, the Lisbon Strategy was set to treat the economic problems that EU is facing. This article discusses and evaluates the potential of the Lisbon Agenda and presents the ways how growth in GDP per capita and employability could be increased by synchronized education and employment policies. It is widely believed that jobs are becoming more and more demanding of skills and as a result workers need to upgrade their skills or risk loosing out in the competition for jobs in the new economy. The research confirms that the reason why many of these unemployed workers might be considered "unemployable in a modern economy" is their comparatively low level of education. Employment rates rise with educational attainment and higher educated individuals also face a more stable labour market than lower educated individuals. The research concludes that in situation of stable higher unemployment rates and higher demand for specific labour skills it is obvious that the coordination between employment and education policies is needed. To ensure employability, policies for promoting education and lifelong learning have to be adjusted to changes in the economy and society.
    05/2008;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines the extent to which the European Institute for Innovation and Technology (EIT) represents an institutional innovation in the EU landscape. This flagship initiative of the Barroso I Commission was established in March 2008 and aims at unlocking Europe‘s innovation potential by pooling together the best European students, researchers and businesses in integrated partnerships, called 'Knowledge Innovation Communities' (KICs), which should be operational by mid-2010. Using a comparative approach with a sample of leading technological universities, both EIT's nature and added value are questioned. Empirical findings lead to the conclusion that the institute can be considered as an institutional novelty, mainly because of its atypical virtual two-level structure, its independence and long-term focus and the integration of education, but that its added value - and thus its innovativeness - may be limited.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
42 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014