Innovation Policy Instruments

Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 01/2007;
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The Lisbon Agenda that was launched in 2000, and had a set time-period of ten years. The purpose of the Lisbon Agenda was to make the EU the most competitive, knowledge-based economy in the world, and at the same time preserving, or even improving social cohesion and maintain environmental sustainability. The Lisbon Agenda had a large number of goals, in both quantified and qualified measures, in different areas. The main instrument that was put forward was the open method of co-ordination (OMC) that includes indicators, benchmarking, peer pressure, and best practise demonstrations. The forthcoming Lisbon Agenda will certainly need new approaches, and new instruments. One of the areas of instruments that can be further explored is innovation policies where the use of R&D and human capital is enhanced. Human capital is a natural part of a knowledge-based economy, and has positive impacts on growth, and jobs in the economy. Innovation policy instruments are diversified and are integrated in many areas of an economy and on many levels, which make them ideal for the next Lisbon Agenda. The instruments can have a general or specific characteristics and some span over the two characteristics.

Download full-text


Available from: Charlie Karlsson, Sep 26, 2015
1 Follower
28 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper focuses on the effect public subsidies for innovation have on the exit of firms. Utilizing Finnish firm level data I employ a kernel matching approach to eliminate the selection bias of public funding and estimate the counterfactual. As a robustness check a treatment model is estimated. Public funding for innovation exhibits a significant effect reducing the probability of exit. Distinguishing between exit by merger and exit by closure shows that public funding has a significant effect on the former. No significant effect on the latter can be found. KeywordsPublic funding–Innovation–Exit of firms
    Journal of Evolutionary Economics 08/2010; 21(3):519-543. DOI:10.1007/s00191-010-0186-0 · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines the extent to which the European Institute for Innovation and Technology (EIT) represents an institutional innovation in the EU landscape. This flagship initiative of the Barroso I Commission was established in March 2008 and aims at unlocking Europe‘s innovation potential by pooling together the best European students, researchers and businesses in integrated partnerships, called 'Knowledge Innovation Communities' (KICs), which should be operational by mid-2010. Using a comparative approach with a sample of leading technological universities, both EIT's nature and added value are questioned. Empirical findings lead to the conclusion that the institute can be considered as an institutional novelty, mainly because of its atypical virtual two-level structure, its independence and long-term focus and the integration of education, but that its added value - and thus its innovativeness - may be limited.
Show more