Article

Significant survival improvement of patients with recurrent breast cancer in the periods 2001-2008 vs. 1992-2000.

Department of Breast Surgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
BMC Cancer (Impact Factor: 3.33). 03/2011; 11:118. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-118
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is unclear whether individualized treatments based on biological factors have improved the prognosis of recurrent breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survival improvement of patients with recurrent breast cancer after the introduction of third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and trastuzumab.
A total of 407 patients who received first diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer and treatment at National Kyushu Cancer Center between 1992 and 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. As AIs and trastuzumab were approved for clinical use in Japan in 2001, the patients were divided into two time cohorts depending on whether the cancer recurred before or after 2001. Cohort A: 170 patients who were diagnosed between 1992 and 2000. Cohort B: 237 patients who were diagnosed between 2001 and 2008. Tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcome were compared.
Fourteen percent of cohort A and 76% of cohort B received AIs and/or trastuzumab (P < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) times after breast cancer recurrence were 1.7 years and 4.2 years for these respective cohorts (P < 0.001). Both the time period and treatment of AIs and/or trastuzumab for recurrent disease were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis (cohort B vs. cohort A: HR = 0.70, P = 0.01; AIs and/or trastuzumab for recurrent disease: yes vs. no: HR = 0.46, P < 0.001). When patients were categorized into 4 subgroups by the expression of hormone receptor (HR) and HER-2 status, the median OS times of the HR-positive/HER-2-negative, HR-positive/HER-2-positive, HR-negative/HER-2-positive, and HR-negative/HER-2-negative subtypes were 2.2, 2.4, 1.6, and 1.0 years in cohort A and 4.5, 5.1, 5.0, and 1.4 years in cohort B.
The prognosis of patients with recurrent breast cancer was improved over time following the introduction of AIs and trastuzumab and the survival improvement was apparent in HR- and/or HER-2-positive tumors.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
71 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that primary breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive status have better outcomes in terms of both overall survival and disease-free intervals (DFI). However, 25.2 % of our ER-positive patients experienced recurrence. This study aimed to define factors potentially predicting survival after first recurrence in surgically treated patients with stage I-III breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 252 females with recurrent breast cancer who had undergone surgery and been followed at Kyoto University Hospital in Japan. Age, clinical stage, pathological stage, axillary lymph node involvement, ER status at the time of diagnosis, progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, operative method, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant endocrine therapy, use of trastuzumab after recurrence, site of recurrence, DFI, and time of recurrence were examined for possible influences on survival after the first recurrence. RESULTS: Positive ER status and positive PR status at the time of diagnosis were significantly favorable factors of survival after first recurrence for patients with recurrence, p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively. More than two sites of recurrence (p < 0.001) were associated with shorter survival time after the first recurrence on multivariate analysis. Survival of patients with recurrent breast cancer steadily improved from 1980-1994 to 1995-2008, significantly in ER-negative subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Positive ER status at the time of diagnosis is a powerful predictor for favorable survival after first recurrence. Survival time after first recurrence of breast cancer has steadily increased in recent decades. Advances in treatments and attitudes about breast cancer have contributed to this improvement in survival after first recurrence.
    Breast Cancer 04/2012; · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unlike early stage breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally considered incurable except for a small number of patients with oligometastatic disease. The goal of treatment of MBC should be the prolongation of life and improvement of symptoms and quality of life. The prognoses of patients with MBC, however, have been improved with the introduction of newer, more effective agents. Therefore, the clinical question arises whether MBC patients can be cured with these new therapeutic agents. However, there are a couple of problems in tackling this question, including the duration of follow-up and the presence of strong adjuvant therapy. Firstly, most trials in MBC have a relatively short follow-up; long-term surveillance (>3-5 years) is exceptional, so little is known about the definitive outcome and the exact proportion of long-term survivors. Secondly, most of the patients have received pre- or postoperative adjuvant therapy. The cancer cells at metastatic sites are considered to be relatively resistant to the agents used in metastatic settings. Promisingly, a number of novel therapeutic agents including antibody-drug conjugates, irreversible small molecule HER2-tyrosine inhibitors, and HER2 dimerization inhibitors show promise in the treatment of HER2-overexpressing MBC, as well as PARP-1 [poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1] inhibitors for triple-negative breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer 06/2011; 19(3):212-7. · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The incidence of breast cancer has been increasing in Japan over the past three decades, and it is the currently the most common malignancy in Japan. This study investigated the temporal trends of the surgical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: We evaluated 543 consecutive patients who underwent breast-cancer resection between 1980 and 2009. The temporal trends in the surgical outcome and clinicopathological features were evaluated separately for the periods covering 1980 to 1989, 1990 to 1999, and 2000 to 2009. RESULTS: The number of patients who underwent resection during these three respective periods were 133, 176, and 234, respectively. All patients were women. The percentage of patients at stages 0 or 1 was 63.2%, 58.5%, and 43.6%, respectively, during the three periods. The mean diameter of tumors in each period was 38, 29, and 30 mm, respectively. The percentage of tumors with positive ER expression was 62.5%, 64.3%, and 69.7%, respectively. In terms of surgical procedures, the use of Halsted's radical mastectomy decreased during each period: from 40.6% of cases to 8.5% and then to 0.4%, while the proportion of breast-conserving therapies increased, from 0% to 12.5%, and finally to 35.9%. The postoperative 10-year survival rates during the three periods were 75.9%, 83.5%, and 84.9%, respectively. The 10-year survival rates of patients with stage II disease during the three periods were 66.2%, 75.7%, and 90.7%, respectively. The prognosis of stage III disease in the three periods also showed a tendency toward improvement, increasing from 37.8% to 64.2%, and finally to 84.5%. CONCLUSION: The survival of patients with stage II and III disease has improved during the past 30 years. Along with the recent advances in drug therapy, the surgical treatment has become less invasive, often because of drug therapy-related modifications.
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology 06/2012; 10(1):108. · 1.09 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
31 Downloads
Available from
Jun 2, 2014