Article

Significant survival improvement of patients with recurrent breast cancer in the periods 2001-2008 vs. 1992-2000.

Department of Breast Surgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
BMC Cancer (Impact Factor: 3.33). 03/2011; 11:118. DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-11-118
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is unclear whether individualized treatments based on biological factors have improved the prognosis of recurrent breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survival improvement of patients with recurrent breast cancer after the introduction of third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and trastuzumab.
A total of 407 patients who received first diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer and treatment at National Kyushu Cancer Center between 1992 and 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. As AIs and trastuzumab were approved for clinical use in Japan in 2001, the patients were divided into two time cohorts depending on whether the cancer recurred before or after 2001. Cohort A: 170 patients who were diagnosed between 1992 and 2000. Cohort B: 237 patients who were diagnosed between 2001 and 2008. Tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcome were compared.
Fourteen percent of cohort A and 76% of cohort B received AIs and/or trastuzumab (P < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) times after breast cancer recurrence were 1.7 years and 4.2 years for these respective cohorts (P < 0.001). Both the time period and treatment of AIs and/or trastuzumab for recurrent disease were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis (cohort B vs. cohort A: HR = 0.70, P = 0.01; AIs and/or trastuzumab for recurrent disease: yes vs. no: HR = 0.46, P < 0.001). When patients were categorized into 4 subgroups by the expression of hormone receptor (HR) and HER-2 status, the median OS times of the HR-positive/HER-2-negative, HR-positive/HER-2-positive, HR-negative/HER-2-positive, and HR-negative/HER-2-negative subtypes were 2.2, 2.4, 1.6, and 1.0 years in cohort A and 4.5, 5.1, 5.0, and 1.4 years in cohort B.
The prognosis of patients with recurrent breast cancer was improved over time following the introduction of AIs and trastuzumab and the survival improvement was apparent in HR- and/or HER-2-positive tumors.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views
  • Source
    07/2013;
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was performed to evaluate prognostic factors for survival from first relapse (SFFR) in stage I-III breast cancer patients. From June 1994 to June 2008, 3,835 patients were treated with surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer at Samsung Medical Center. Among them, a total of 224 patients died by June 2009, and 175 deaths were of breast cancer. Retrospective review was performed on medical records of 165 patients who met the inclusion criteria of this study. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done on survivals according to variables, such as age, stage, hormone status of tumor, disease-free interval (DFI), sites of first failure, number of organs involved by recurrent disease (NOR), application of salvage treatments, and existence of brain or liver metastasis (visceral metastasis). Patients' median overall survival time was 38 months (range, 8 to 123 months). Median SFFR was 17 months (range, 5 to 87 months). Ninety percent of deaths occurred within 40 months after first recurrence. The patients with SFFR ≤1 year had tendency of triple-negativity, shorter DFI (≤2 years), larger NOR (>3), visceral metastasis for first relapse than the patients with SFFR >1 year. In multivariate analysis, longer DFI (>2 vs. ≤2 years), absence of visceral metastasis, and application of salvage treatments were statistically significant prognosticators for longer SFFR. The DFI, application of salvage treatments, and visceral metastasis were significant prognostic factors for SFFR in breast cancer patients.
    Radiation oncology journal. 12/2013; 31(4):222-7.
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Survival times of women starting first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in routine clinical practice were determined and compared with those from a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. METHODS: We identified women with MBC starting first-line chemotherapy from June 2003 to February 2011 and recorded their demographics; tumour and treatment characteristics; and survival times from the start of chemotherapy. Their survival distribution was summarised by the following percentiles (represented scenarios for survival): 90(th) (worst-case), 75(th) (lower-typical), 25(th) (upper-typical) and 10(th) (best-case) which were compared with the same percentiles from our systematic review of first-line chemotherapy trials. RESULTS: The 273 women had a median age of 56 years, and a median time from diagnosis of MBC of 3 months. ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 80%. Tumours were hormone receptor positive in 69%, HER2-positive in 27%, and triple negative in 13%. Survival times in months in routine clinical practice (versus the systematic review) were: 90(th) percentile 4 (6); 75(th) percentile 9 (12); median 20 (22); 25(th) percentile 36 (36) and 10(th) percentile 61 (56). Independent predictors of OS included HER2-positive disease (HR 0.49, p=0.0002), hormone receptor positive disease (HR 0.51, p=0.0004), ECOG 0-1 (HR 0.36, p<0.0001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.86, p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Median and better survival times in routine practice were similar to those from randomized clinical trials; however survival times worse than the median were shorter, likely reflecting patient selection in trials. Oncologists should adjust trial-based survival estimates for patients not meeting typical trial eligibility criteria.
    Internal Medicine Journal 05/2013; · 1.82 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
24 Downloads
Available from
Nov 18, 2012