Determination of lying behavior patterns in healthy beef cattle by use of wireless accelerometers.

Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
American Journal of Veterinary Research (Impact Factor: 1.21). 04/2011; 72(4):467-73. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.4.467
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe daily, hourly, and animal-to-animal effects on lying behavior in steers.
25 crossbred beef steers.
Wireless accelerometers were used to record behavioral data for cattle housed in a drylot cattle research facility during two 20-day periods (winter 2007 [n = 10 steers] and spring 2008 [15]). Behavioral data were categorized into lying, standing, and walking behaviors for each time point recorded. Logistic regression models were used to determine potential associations between the percentage of time spent lying and several factors, including time (hour) of day, day of trial, and steer.
Lying behavior was significantly associated with hour of day, and a distinct circadian rhythm was identified. Steers spent > 55% of the time between 8:00 pm and 4:00 am lying and were most active (<30% lying behavior) during feeding periods (6:00 am to 7:00 am and 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm). Model-adjusted mean percentage of time spent lying was significantly associated with study day and was between 45% and 55% on most (27/40 [67.5%]) days. Lying behavior varied significantly among steers, and mean ± SD percentage of time spent lying ranged from 28.9 ± 6.1 % to 66.1 ± 6.6%.
Cattle had distinct circadian rhythm patterns for lying behavior, and percentage of time spent lying varied by day and among steers. Researchers need to account for factors that affect lying patterns of cattle (ie, time of day, day of trial, and individual animal) when performing research with behavioral outcomes.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contact patterns among hosts are considered as one of the most critical factors contributing to unequal pathogen transmission. Consequently, networks have been widely applied in infectious disease modeling. However most studies assume static network structure due to lack of accurate observation and appropriate analytic tools. In this study we used high temporal and spatial resolution animal position data to construct a high-resolution contact network relevant to infectious disease transmission. The animal contact network aggregated at hourly level was highly variable and dynamic within and between days, for both network structure (network degree distribution) and individual rank of degree distribution in the network (degree order). We integrated network degree distribution and degree order heterogeneities with a commonly used contact-based, directly transmitted disease model to quantify the effect of these two sources of heterogeneity on the infectious disease dynamics. Four conditions were simulated based on the combination of these two heterogeneities. Simulation results indicated that disease dynamics and individual contribution to new infections varied substantially among these four conditions under both parameter settings. Changes in the contact network had a greater effect on disease dynamics for pathogens with smaller basic reproduction number (i.e. R0 < 2).
    Scientific Reports 03/2014; 4:4472. DOI:10.1038/srep04472 · 5.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tail tip injuries occur in some feedlot cattle housed in slatted-floor facilities typically found in the Midwestern United States. The practice of tail docking cattle upon entry into these feedlot facilities was initiated to prevent tail injuries. Tail docking is a welfare concern from the standpoint that an important method of fly avoidance is removed and the tail docking procedure is painful and often excludes local anesthesia or extended analgesia. The primary objective of this study was to describe the behavioral responses of feedlot cattle following tail docking. Thirty-six heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups; docked (DK) or control (CN). All calves received an epidural following surgical preparation of the sacrococcygeal area and post-operative intravenous flunixin meglumine. A portion of the tail of DK calves was removed using pruning shears. An elastrator band was placed near the tail tip for hemostasis and tail tips were sprayed with fly spray. IceQube™ accelerometers collected step counts, motion index, lying time, lying bouts, and lying bout duration during d -4 - 13. Direct observations of cattle behavior were performed on d 0, 1, and 2. Step counts of DK calves were increased (P < 0.05) on d 0, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10 and 13, and motion index of DK calves was also increased (P < 0.05) on d 0, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11 and 13. Docked cattle performed rear foot stomp behavior more (P < 0.001) than controls on d 0, 1, and 2. Forty-eight hours after tail docking, DK calves had increased lying bouts per h (1.7 vs. 0.9 on d 0, P < 0.001; 1.1 vs. 0.8 on d 1, P < 0.01) but reduced lying bout durations (12.6 vs. 47.1 min on d 0, P < 0.001; 22.6 vs. 44.7 min on d 1, P < 0.001). On d 0, DK calves twitched tails more (P < 0.05) and ruminated less (P < 0.001). Despite provision of peri-operative and post-operative analgesia, we identified altered behavior in docked cattle that may reflect a compromised welfare state for tail-docked feedlot cattle. We recommend that alternative strategies to reduce tail tip injury be explored.
    Journal of Animal Science 09/2014; 92(10). DOI:10.2527/jas.2014-7583 · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Postural synchrony, in which cattle lie down or stand up at the same time as other members of their herd, occurs both in animals housed indoors when enough resources are available and in those out at pasture, but the mechanisms by which such synchrony is achieved are poorly understood. We report a study of 6 groups of young cattle (Bos taurus) at pasture in which our aim was to study postural synchrony at different times of day and in relation to the postures of neighbouring cattle.All of the observed groups exhibited a high degree of synchrony in lying/standing, as 70% of animals in a group exhibited the same posture over 93% of the time. Time of day had a significant effect (P≈0.0046): cattle were least synchronized in the middle of the day and most synchronized in the morning and evening. With the increasing use of synchrony of lying as a measure of welfare in cattle, such temporal effects need to be taken into account.Cattle were more synchronized with the posture of a near neighbour than they were with that of a randomly chosen member of the herd (P≈0.016), suggesting that cattle were actively synchronizing their postures with that of their neighbours. These results indicate that a full understanding of the mechanisms of postural synchronization in cattle herds will need to incorporate both collective (allelomimetic) and concurrent (individual) responses.
    Livestock Science 11/2012; 149(s 1–2):70–73. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2012.06.028 · 1.10 Impact Factor


Available from
Sep 23, 2014