IL-6 Induced by Staphylococcus aureus Infection Prevents the Induction of Skin Allograft Acceptance in Mice

Department of Surgery Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
American Journal of Transplantation (Impact Factor: 6.19). 03/2011; 11(5):936-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03476.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinical correlations between bacterial infections and rejection suggest a hypothesis that innate immune stimulation by bacterial infections results in the production of inflammatory cytokine that facilitate bystander T-cell activation, increased alloreactivity and inhibition of tolerance induction. Previous studies demonstrated that IFNβ produced during an infection with a model bacterium, Listeria monocytogenes, prevented the induction of transplantation tolerance in mice with anti-CD154 and donor-specific transfusion (DST) (1). We investigated the impact of two clinically relevant bacterial infections at the time of transplantation on the ability of anti-CD154 and DST to induce skin allograft acceptance in mice. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) infection prevented skin allograft acceptance whereas maximally tolerated doses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection had no effect. SA induced an acute production of IL-6, which was necessary and sufficient for the prevention of skin allograft acceptance. Furthermore, a single pulse of methylprednisolone modulated IL-6 production during SA infection and facilitated skin allograft acceptance in SA-infected recipients. Taken together, our results suggest that bacterial infections elicit specific proinflammatory cytokines signatures that can serve as barriers to tolerance induction, and that inhibiting the production of or neutralizing these inflammatory cytokines can synergize with costimulatory blockade-based therapies to facilitate the development of transplantation tolerance.

Download full-text


Available from: Anita Chong, Jan 16, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The vertebrate innate immune system consists of inflammatory cells and soluble mediators that comprise the first line of defense against microbial infection and, importantly, trigger antigen-specific T and B cell responses that lead to lasting immunity. The molecular mechanisms responsible for microbial non-self recognition by the innate immune system have been elucidated for a large number of pathogens. How the innate immune system recognizes non-microbial non-self, such as organ transplants, is less clear. In this review, we approach this question by describing the principal mechanisms of non-self, or 'damaged' self, recognition by the innate immune system (pattern recognition receptors, the missing self theory, and the danger hypothesis) and discussing whether and how these mechanisms apply to allograft rejection.
    Seminars in Immunology 06/2011; 23(4):264-72. DOI:10.1016/j.smim.2011.06.006 · 6.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As a consequence of ischemia-reperfusion injury of whole organ transplants and hypoxia-anoxia of cell transplants, transplantation unavoidably triggers adverse, cytodestructive inflammation within the allograft. Interventions that dampen adverse inflammation may limit the extent and duration of this injury, and preserve tissue function. Moreover, these interventions should create a milieu that guides many donor-activated T cells into a tissue-protective phenotype, thus promoting graft acceptance or even tolerance. Hence, it is useful, maybe crucial, to identify the measures that minimize deleterious consequences of acute and chronic inflammation upon allograft. Several therapies that inhibit activity of certain proinflammatory cytokines or expression of tissue "danger signals", while sustaining or potentially enhancing the expression of tissue-intrinsic anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective genes, are awaiting clinical trials or are already approved for the treatment of immuno-inflammatory disorders. If applied in the peritransplant period, such cytoprotective regimens may increase the pool of donor organs suitable for transplantation, reduce the overall requirements for maintenance immunosuppression and perhaps foster transplant tolerance.
    Seminars in Immunology 08/2011; 23(3):209-13. DOI:10.1016/j.smim.2011.07.006 · 6.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adaptive immunity in both mouse and man results in the generation of immunological memory. Memory T cells are both friend and foe to transplant recipients, as they are intimately involved and in many cases absolutely required for the maintenance of protective immunity in the face immunosuppression, yet from the evidence presented herein they clearly constitute a formidable barrier for the successful implementation of tolerance induction strategies in transplantation. This review describes the experimental evidence demonstrating the increased resistance of memory T cells to many distinct tolerance induction strategies, and outlines recent advances in our knowledge of the ways in which alloreactive memory T cells arise in previously untransplanted individuals. Understanding the impact of alloreactive memory T cell specificity, frequency, and quality might allow for better donor selection in order to minimize the donor-reactive memory T cell barrier in an individual transplant recipient, thus allowing stratification of relative risk of alloreactive memory T cell mediated rejection, and conversely increase the likelihood of successful establishment of tolerance. However, further research into the molecular and cellular pathways involved in alloreactive memory T cell-mediated rejection is required in order to design new strategies to overcome the memory T cell barrier, without critically impairing protective immunity.
    Frontiers in Immunology 03/2012; 3:36. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2012.00036
Show more