Article

The Anaphase-Promoting Complex is a dual integrator that regulates both MicroRNA-mediated transcriptional regulation of Cyclin B1 and degradation of Cyclin B1 during Arabidopsis male gametophyte development

Plant Gene Expression Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service and Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California-Berkeley, Albany, California 94710, USA.
The Plant Cell (Impact Factor: 9.58). 03/2011; 23(3):1033-46. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.083980
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), an essential ubiquitin protein ligase, regulates mitotic progression and exit by enhancing degradation of cell cycle regulatory proteins, such as CYCB1;1, whose transcripts are upregulated by DUO POLLEN1 (DUO1). DUO1 is required for cell division in male gametophytes and is a target of microRNA 159 (miR159) in Arabidopsis thaliana. Whether APC/C is required for DUO1-dependent CYCB1;1 regulation is unknown. Mutants in both APC8 and APC13 had pleiotrophic phenotypes resembling those of mutants affecting microRNA biogenesis. We show that these apc/c mutants had reduced miR159 levels and increased DUO1 and CYCB1;1 transcript levels and that APC/C is required to recruit RNA polymerase II to MIR159 promoters. Thus, in addition to its role in degrading CYCB1;1, APC/C stimulates production of miR159, which downregulates DUO1 expression, leading to reduced CYCB1;1 transcription. Both MIR159 and APC8-yellow fluorescent protein accumulated in unicellular microspores and bicellular pollen but decreased in tricellular pollen, suggesting that spatial and temporal regulation of miR159 by APC/C ensures mitotic progression. Consistent with this, the percentage of mature pollen with no or single sperm-like cells increased in apc/c mutants and plants overexpressing APC8 partially mimicked the duo1 phenotype. Thus, APC/C is an integrator that regulates both microRNA-mediated transcriptional regulation of CYCB1;1 and degradation of CYCB1;1.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sheila McCormick, Sep 02, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
86 Views
 · 
55 Downloads
  • Source
    • "The resulting pENTR-CYP90A1p vector was used for LR Clonase TM (Life Technologies) recombination reaction with the pGreenII-based binary Gateway Ò destination vector pGII-NLS3XGFP (Zheng et al. 2011), derived from NLS:3xEGFP::nost (Takada and Jürgens 2007). The resulting expression vector CYP90A1p:NLS:3xEGFP was transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 (pMP90, pSOUP) and used for Arabidopsis Col-0 transformation by the floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pollen tubes are among the fastest tip-growing plant cells and represent an excellent experimental system for studying the dynamics and spatiotemporal control of polarized cell growth. However, investigating pollen tube tip growth in the model plant Arabidopsis remains difficult because in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth rates are highly variable and largely different from those observed in pistils, most likely due to growth-promoting properties of the female reproductive tract. We found that in vitro grown Arabidopsis pollen respond to brassinosteroid (BR) in a dose-dependent manner. Pollen germination and pollen tube growth increased nine- and fivefold, respectively, when media were supplemented with 10 µM epibrassinolide (epiBL), resulting in growth kinetics more similar to growth in vivo. Expression analyses show that the promoter of one of the key enzymes in BR biosynthesis, CYP90A1/CPD, is highly active in the cells of the reproductive tract that form the pathway for pollen tubes from the stigma to the ovules. Pollen tubes grew significantly shorter through the reproductive tract of a cyp90a1 mutant compared to the wild type, or to a BR perception mutant. Our results show that epiBL promotes pollen germination and tube growth in vitro and suggest that the cells of the reproductive tract provide BR compounds to stimulate pollen tube growth.
    Plant Reproduction 07/2014; 27(3). DOI:10.1007/s00497-014-0247-x
  • Source
    • "The PCR products were cloned into pENTR™/D-TOPO (Invitrogen). The resulting promoter fragments were subsequently transferred into a Gateway-compatible version (Zheng et al., 2011) of the pGreenII-based vector NLS:3GFP:NOSt (Takada and Jürgens, 2007), termed pGII_GW:NLS:3GFP:NOSt. For AGP1, AGP15, and AGP23 β-glucuronidase (GUS) constructs, the respective promoter fragments were cloned into the binary vector pBG- WFS7 (Karimi et al., 2002). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) are heavily glycosylated proteins existing in all members of the plant kingdom and are differentially distributed through distinctive developmental stages. Here, we showed the individual distributions of specific Arabidopsis AGPs: AGP1, AGP9, AGP12, AGP15, and AGP23, throughout reproductive tissues and indicated their possible roles in several reproductive processes. AGP genes specifically expressed in female tissues were identified using available microarray data. This selection was confirmed by promoter analysis using multiple green fluorescent protein fusions to a nuclear localization signal, β-glucuronidase fusions, and in situ hybridization as approaches to confirm the expression patterns of the AGPs. Promoter analysis allowed the detection of a specific and differential presence of these proteins along the pathway followed by the pollen tube during its journey to reach the egg and the central cell inside the embryo sac. AGP1 was expressed in the stigma, style, transmitting tract, and the chalazal and funiculus tissues of the ovules. AGP9 was present along the vasculature of the reproductive tissues and AGP12 was expressed in the stigmatic cells, chalazal and funiculus cells of the ovules, and in the septum. AGP15 was expressed in all pistil tissues, except in the transmitting tract, while AGP23 was specific to the pollen grain and pollen tube. The expression pattern of these AGPs provides new evidence for the detection of a subset of specific AGPs involved in plant reproductive processes, being of significance for this field of study. AGPs are prominent candidates for male–female communication during reproduction.
    Journal of Experimental Botany 07/2014; 65(18). DOI:10.1093/jxb/eru300 · 5.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The converging point of regulation by CPR5 and UVI4 might be on the cyclins. OSD1 and UVI4 are shown to regulate cyclins mainly at the protein level through the E3 ligase complex APC/C [12], [13], and a transcriptional regulation of CYCB1;1 by APC/C also takes place [41]. CPR5 directly or indirectly affects transcript level of cyclins although the mechanism is unknown. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The impact of cell cycle on plant immunity was indicated by the enhancement of disease resistance with overexpressing OSD1 and UVI4 genes that are negative regulators of cell cycle controller APC (anaphase promoting complex). CPR5 is another gene that is implicated in cell cycle regulation and plant immunity, but its mode of action is not known. Here we report the analysis of genetic requirement for the function of UVI4 and OSD1 in cell cycle progression control and in particular the involvement of CPR5 in this regulation. We show that the APC activator CCS52A1 partially mediates the function of OSD1 and UVI4 in female gametophyte development. We found that the cpr5 mutation suppresses the endoreduplication defect in the uvi4 single mutant and partially rescued the gametophyte development defect in the osd1 uvi4 double mutant while the uvi4 mutation enhances the cpr5 defects in trichome branching and plant disease resistance. In addition, cyclin B1 genes CYCB1;1, CYCB1;2, and CYCB1;4 are upregulated in cpr5. Therefore, CPR5 has a large role in cell cycle regulation and this role has a complex interaction with that of UVI4 and OSD1. This study further indicates an intrinsic link between plant defense responses and cell cycle progression.
    PLoS ONE 06/2014; 9(6):e100347. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0100347 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Show more