Diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic pigmented lesions

School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Impact Factor: 5). 03/2011; 64(6):1068-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.03.039
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It is unknown whether dermatoscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy for all types of pigmented skin lesions or only for those that are melanocytic.
We sought to assess if the addition of dermatoscopy to clinical examination with the unaided eye improves diagnostic accuracy for all types of pigmented lesions.
We analyzed 463 consecutively excised pigmented skin lesions collected during a period of 30 months in a primary care skin cancer practice in Queensland, Australia.
Of 463 lesions, 217 (46.9%) were nonmelanocytic. Overall 30% (n = 138) were malignant including 29 melanomas, 72 basal cell carcinomas, and 37 squamous cell carcinomas. The diagnostic accuracy for malignant neoplasms measured as area under receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.89 with dermatoscopy and 0.83 without it (P < .001). Given a fixed specificity of 80%, the corresponding sensitivity was 82.6% with dermatoscopy and 70.5% without it. The improvement achieved by dermatoscopy was higher for nonmelanocytic lesions than for melanocytic lesions. A short algorithm based on pattern analysis reached a sensitivity of 98.6% for basal cell carcinoma, 86.5% for pigmented squamous cell carcinoma, and 79.3% for melanoma. Among benign conditions, the highest false-positive rate (90.5%) was observed for lichen planus-like keratosis.
Estimates of diagnostic accuracy are influenced by verification bias.
Dermatoscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy for nonmelanocytic lesions. A simple algorithm based on pattern analysis is suitable for the detection of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The dermoscope improves general practitioners' (GP) sensitivity for melanoma. However, diagnostic accuracy (DA) and cost-effectiveness of the dermoscope in primary care for the evaluation of all skin lesions suspected of malignancy remains unknown. Objectives To determine the DA and cost-effectiveness of the dermoscope in primary care for skin lesions suspected of malignancy. Methods In a cluster randomized clinical trial, 48 Dutch general practices were randomized to either intervention group using a dermoscope or control group using only naked-eye examination. A total of 194 lesions from 170 patients in the intervention group and 222 lesions from 211 patients in the control group were analysed for DA and cost-effectiveness. ResultsThe percentage of correctly diagnosed lesions in intervention group and control group was 50.5% and 40.5% respectively. This was 61.5% and 22.2% for melanomas. In the intervention group, three malignancies were treated with the expectative treatment option compared to none in the control group. The odds ratio (OR) of a correct diagnosis in the intervention group, compared to control group, was 1.51 (95% CI: 0.96–2.37) P = 0.07. Consequently, the relative risk was 1.25. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €89 (95% CI −€60 to €598), indicating that using a dermoscope costs an additional €89 for one additional correctly diagnosed patient. Additional analyses showed better effects of dermoscopy compared to the control group for 98% of the bootstrap resamples. Conclusions The probability of a correct diagnosis was 1.25 times higher using a dermoscope than without a dermoscope. Although this difference is marginally not statistically significant, dermoscopy in general practice appears to be cost effective. We therefore think that GPs should be trained to use a dermoscope, although they should realize that even with the use of a dermoscope not all lesions will be diagnosed correctly.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 11/2013; 28(11). DOI:10.1111/jdv.12306 · 3.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: REsUMEN Las queratosis seborreicas son neoplasias epidérmicas benignas y frecuentes, que por su variedad de presentación clínica requieren ser diferenciadas de otras lesiones pigmentadas y no pigmentadas, benignas y malignas. La dermatoscopia es una herramienta diagnóstica no invasiva, que en manos de médicos bien capacitados en esta técnica aumenta la certeza diagnóstica en 5 a 30%. Actualmente existen criterios bien establecidos para diagnosticar las queratosis seborreicas por dermatoscopia, como los quistes de milium, los tapones folicu-lares, las fisuras, las crestas y estructuras en huella digital, así como criterios adicionales (vasos en horquilla, borde apolillado, estructuras tipo red pigmentaria, etc.). Es importante conocer estos criterios, ya que por el polimorfismo de las lesiones (a pesar de ser consideradas lesiones "banales") éstas pueden confundirse clínicamente o coexistir con tumores malignos, como el carcinoma basocelular y el melanoma. Palabras clave: dermatoscopia, queratosis seborreica, quistes de milium, tapones foliculares, fisuras, crestas, estructuras en huella digital, vasos en horquilla. ABsTRACT Seborrheic keratosis are frequent, benign, epidermic tumors and due to their variety of clinical presentations they must be differentiated from other pigmented and non pigmented, benign and malignant lesions. Dermoscopy is a non-invasive, diagnostic tool that can increase the diagnostic accuracy from 5% to 30%. Today there are well established criteria to diagnose seborrheic keratosis with dermoscopy: millia-like cysts, comedo-like openings, fissures and ridges, fingerprint-like structures and additional criteria described (hairpin vessels, moth-eaten border, network-like structures), due to their polymorphic presentations, are considered banal lesions, and they could be misdiagnosed or coexist with some other malignant tumors, such as basal cell carcinoma or melanoma.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Common inflammatory skin diseases can be correctly diagnosed with clinical examination. However, unusual presentations do exist and may cause difficulties in the differentiation among different entities, and histopathology is required for an accurate diagnosis. In this regard, dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) can play an important role in increasing the specificity of the diagnosis, offering the possibility of improved management of patients. In this review, the authors have analyzed dermoscopic patterns of lichen planus, discoid lupus erythematosus, psoriasis and alopecias as prototypes of inflammatory skin diseases, and correlated them with RCM microscopical features. RCM, thanks to its correspondence to histology and to the possibility of an immediate correlation to dermoscopy, provides additional information useful for increasing the sensibility and specificity of dermoscopy.
    Expert Review of Dermatology 01/2014; 8(3). DOI:10.1586/edm.13.27


Available from
Jun 3, 2014