Article

Mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients undergoing transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0538, USA.
Liver Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.79). 03/2011; 17(8):934-42. DOI: 10.1002/lt.22307
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (I-CC) are increasingly being reported in patients with cirrhosis. The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the incidence, imaging features, and posttransplant outcomes for patients who underwent transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and were found to have HCC-CC or I-CC in the explant and (2) to compare the outcomes of these patients with those of controls with HCC who were matched (1:3) by the tumor size and the number of nodules in the explant. In the explant specimens of 10 of 302 patients (3.3%) who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for HCC, mixed HCC-CC or I-CC was identified. There were 4 additional incidental cases of HCC-CC. After a median follow-up period of 32 months, 8 of the 14 patients (57%) suffered from tumor recurrence, and the median disease-free survival time was 8 months. The cumulative risk of tumor recurrence was 40% and 70% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, for these 14 patients. When the 4 incidental cases were excluded, the study group with HCC-CC or I-CC (n = 10) had a significantly lower incidence of well-differentiated tumors (11.1% versus 43.3%, P < 0.02) and a higher rate of recurrence (60% versus 16.7%, P = 0.008) in comparison with the control group of patients with HCC (n = 30). The 1- and 5-year cumulative risks of tumor recurrence were 42% and 65%, respectively, in the study group and 10% and 17%, respectively, in the control group (P < 0.002). The actuarial 1- and 5-year patient survival rates without recurrence were also significantly lower in the study group (79% and 32% in the study group and 90% and 62% in the control group, P < 0.03). Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging showed progressive contrast enhancement throughout the arterial and portal venous phases without washout in 8 of the 10 patients. In conclusion, HCC-CC and I-CC are associated with a poor prognosis and a high rate of tumor recurrence after LT, and both tumors exhibit radiographic features that are distinct from those observed with HCC.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
99 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to the advances in screening of cirrhotic patients, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being diagnosed in earlier stages. For this reason the number of patients diagnosed of very early HCC (single tumors ≤ 2 cm) is continuously increasing. Once a patient has been diagnosed with this condition, treatment strategies include liver resection, local therapies or liver transplantation. The decision on which therapy should the patient undergo depends on the general patients performance status and liver disease. Anyway, even in patients with similar conditions, the best treatment offer is debatable. In this review we analyze the state of the art on the management of very early HCC on cirrhotic patients to address the best treatment strategy for this patient population.
    World journal of hepatology. 11/2014; 6(11):766-775.
  • Future Oncology 11/2014; 10(15s):89-92. · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2002, the use of the MELD scoring system was adopted as the primary means of determining the priority of patients listed for liver transplantation. Implementation of the MELD system has changed the face of organ allocation for livers and as a result, overall waitlist times along with pre- and post-transplant mortality for patients with significant liver disease have declined. Although the MELD accurately predicts mortality in most patients with end stage liver disease, it may not adequately risk stratify some patients who have a high risk of morbidity and mortality not reflected in the score. Automatic exception points are granted for a subset of conditions if candidates meet agreed upon criteria. However, even within this framework, there are some at risk patients who will be missed. Herein we review conditions associated with increased mortality and morbidity that are not reflected in the MELD score and reflect on the issues which arise when considering allocation of organs to these patients.
    Current Hepatitis Reports 03/2014; 13(1):60-73.

Preview

Download
0 Downloads