Article

Psychiatric outcomes of epilepsy surgery: a systematic review.

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Epilepsia (Impact Factor: 4.58). 03/2011; 52(5):880-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03014.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this systematic review was to identify: (1) prevalence and severity of psychiatric conditions before and after resective epilepsy surgery, (2) incidence of postsurgical psychiatric conditions, and (3) predictors of psychiatric status after surgery.
A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane database as part of a larger project on the development of an appropriateness and necessity rating tool to identify patients of all ages with potentially resectable focal epilepsy. The search yielded 5,061 articles related to epilepsy surgery and of the 763 articles meeting the inclusion criteria and reviewed in full text, 68 reported psychiatric outcomes. Thirteen articles met the final eligibility criteria.
The studies demonstrated either improvements in psychiatric outcome postsurgery or no changes in psychiatric outcome. Only one study demonstrated deterioration in psychiatric status after surgery, with higher anxiety in the context of continued seizures post-surgery. One study reported a significantly increased rate of psychosis after surgery. The two main predictors of psychiatric outcome were seizure freedom and presurgical psychiatric history. De novo psychiatric conditions occurred postsurgery at a rate of 1.1-18.2%, with milder psychiatric issues (e.g., adjustment disorder) being more common than more severe psychiatric issues (e.g., psychosis).
Overall, studies demonstrated either improvement in psychiatric outcomes postsurgery or no change. However, there is a need for more prospective, well-controlled studies to better delineate the prevalence and severity of psychiatric conditions occurring in the context of epilepsy surgery, and to identify specific predictors of psychiatric outcomes after epilepsy surgery.

0 Followers
 · 
133 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epilepsy surgery is indicated for patients with focal seizures who do not respond to appropriate antiepileptic drug therapy consisting of 2 or more medications. To review resective surgery outcomes for focal epilepsy, to identify which patients benefit the most, and to discuss why epilepsy surgery may not be universally accepted. Medline and Cochrane databases were searched between January 1993 and June 2014 for randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and large retrospective case series (>300 patients) using Medical Subject Headings and indexed text terms. Fifty-five articles were included. Subpopulations and prognostic factors were identified. Systematic reviews for cognitive, psychiatric, quality-of-life, and psychosocial outcomes were included. Two randomized clinical trials enrolling 118 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy found greater freedom from seizures with surgery when compared with continued medical treatment (58% vs 8% [n = 80] and 73% vs 0% [n = 38], P < .001). Nine systematic reviews and 2 large case series of medically refractory patients treated with surgery reported seizure-free outcomes in 34% to 74% of patients (median, 62.4%). The remainder of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examined subpopulations. Epilepsy surgery was less effective when there were extratemporal lesions, the epilepsy was not associated with a structural lesion, or both. Seizure-free outcomes were similar between children and adults. Hippocampal sclerosis and benign tumors were associated with better outcomes relative to other pathologies. Similar procedures such as selective amygdalohippocampectomy and temporal lobectomy for temporal lobe epilepsy were associated with subtle differences in seizure and neuropsychological outcome. There is low perioperative mortality (0.1%-0.5%) from epilepsy surgery. The most frequent neurologic complication is visual field defect occurring from temporal lobe resection. Quality of life improved after surgery but improved the most in patients who were seizure-free after surgery. Epilepsy surgery reduced seizure activity in randomized clinical trials when compared with continued medical therapy. Long-term cognitive, psychiatric, psychosocial, and quality-of-life outcomes were less well defined. Despite good outcomes from high-quality clinical trials, referrals of patients with seizures refractory to medical treatment remain infrequent.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 01/2015; 313(3):285-93. DOI:10.1001/jama.2014.17426 · 30.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We explored the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion, degree of seizure laterality on intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), and seizure outcome in patients with ambiguous or presumed bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (BiTLE) on scalp EEG. We systematically reviewed the literature using Embase and MEDLINE up to May 31, 2012. Patients with bilateral iEEG, temporal lobe surgery, and follow-up ≥1 year were included. We undertook three separate analyses on patients whose scalp EEG showed ambiguous onset or BiTLE (1) group data of those whose iEEG demonstrated unilateral TLE, (2) group data of those whose iEEG demonstrated BiTLE, (3) individual patient analysis in those with BiTLE for whom iEEG seizure laterality data were provided. Of 1,403 patients with ambiguous or presumed BiTLE on scalp EEG, 1,027 (73%) proved to have unilateral TLE on iEEG and contributed to the first analysis. Of these, 58% had Engel class I and 9% Engel class II outcomes. Of 132 patients in the second analysis (true BiTLE), Engel class I and II outcomes were achieved in 23% and 14%, respectively. Of 41 patients in the third analysis, 66% and 2% had Engel class I and II outcomes, respectively. The median proportion of seizures ipsilateral to the resection on iEEG did not differ between BiTLE patients with Engel class I–II (76%) and Engel III–IV (78%) outcomes (p = 0.87). Patients with ambiguous or independent bitemporal seizure onset on scalp EEG achieved good surgical outcomes. Overall, a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved good outcomes when iEEG showed unilateral TLE (67%) than when it showed true BiTLE (45%). However, the degree of seizure lateralization in those with BiTLE was not associated with seizure outcome, and it has a limited role in selecting the side of surgery.
    Epilepsia 11/2014; 55(12). DOI:10.1111/epi.12856 · 4.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hippocampal sclerosis is the most common cause of pharmacoresistant epilepsy amenable for surgical treatment and seizure control. The aim of this article is to review and evaluate the published literature related to the outcome of the surgical treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) associated with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) and to describe the future prospects in this field. Surgery of MTLE associated with HS achieves long-term seizure freedom in about 70% (62-83%) of cases. Seizure outcome is similar in the pediatric population. Mortality following temporal resection is very rare (<1%) and the rate of definitive neurological complication is low (1%). Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery used as a treatment for MTLE would have a slightly worse outcome to that of surgical resection, but would provide neuropsychological advantage. However, the average latency before reducing or stopping seizures is at least 9 months with radiosurgery. Regarding palliative surgery, amygdalohippocampal stimulation has been demonstrated to improve the control of epilepsy in carefully selected patients with intractable MTLE who are not candidates for resective surgery. Recent progress in the field of imaging and image-guidance should allow to elaborate tailored surgical strategies for each patient in order to achieve seizure freedom. Concerning therapeutics, closed-loop stimulation strategies allow early seizure detection and responsive stimulation. It may be less toxic and more effective than intermittent and continuous neurostimulation. Moreover, stereotactic radiofrequency amygdalohippocampectomy is a recent approach leading to hopeful results. Closed-loop stimulation and stereotactic radiofrequency amygdalohippocampectomy may provide a new treatment option for patients with pharmacoresistant MTLE. Mesial temporal lobe surgery has been widely evaluated and has become the standard treatment for MTLE associated with HS. Alternative surgical procedures like gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery and amygdalohippocampal stimulation are currently under assessment, with promising results. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
    Revue Neurologique 03/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.neurol.2015.01.561 · 0.60 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
87 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014