Article

A phase 2 trial of erlotinib in patients with previously treated squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Gastrointestinal Oncology Service/Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.9). 04/2011; 117(7):1409-14. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25602
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have activity in solid tumors. The authors evaluated an oral EGFR TKI, erlotinib, in patients with previously treated esophageal cancer.
Thirty patients with measurable, metastatic cancer of the esophageal and gastroesophageal junction received 150 mg erlotinib daily. EGFR-negative tumors (6 patients; 20%) and EGFR-over expressing tumors (24 patients; 80%) were treated. Most patients were men (70%) with adenocarcinoma (57%) and had received previous chemotherapy (97%).
Two partial responses were observe d in the EGFR-positive cohort (2 of 24 patients; 8%), and no responses were observed in the EGFR-negative cohort (0 of 6 patients). Reponses were limited to patients who had squamous cell carcinoma (2 of 13 patients; 15%; response duration, 5.5-7 months). The time to tumor progression was longer in patients who had squamous cell carcinoma (3.3 months; range, 1-24 months) compared with patients who had adenocarcinoma (1.6 months; range, 1-6 months; P = .026). Therapy was tolerable with the expected toxicity of skin rash (grade 1-2, 67%; grade 3, 10%).
Erlotinib had limited activity in patients with esophageal cancer, and responses and some protracted stable disease were observed in those with squamous cell carcinoma. Efficacy according to EGFR status could not be assessed given the rarity of EGFR-negative tumors. The current results indicated that further evaluation of this agent in squamous cell carcinoma is warranted. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Manish A Shah, Feb 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
261 Views
  • Source
    • "Erlotinib (Tarceva®) is the second generation drug. Ilson, D. H.[45] evaluated 30 patients with measurable, metastatic cancer of the esophageal and gastroesophageal junction received 150 mg erlotinib daily. Erlotinib had limited activity in esophageal cancer (2 of 24(8%) partial responses were observed in the EGFR-positive and no responses were observed in the EGFR-negative cohort. "
    Esophageal Cancer - Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomarkers, Nutrition and Treatment, 03/2012; , ISBN: 978-953-51-0223-6
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Esophagogastric cancer represents a significant global health problem, with most patients presenting with advanced-stage disease and consequently with a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy improves survival compared with supportive care alone, and combination chemotherapy regimens are more effective than monotherapy. Overexpression of EGFR and possibly HER2 confer a poor prognosis, providing potentially important therapeutic targets for selected patients. Inhibition of HER2 with the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in patients with HER2 overexpression, HER2 gene amplification, or both, is effective and has been the standard of care for HER2-positive breast cancer for almost a decade. In patients with advanced-stage gastric or esophagogastric-junction adenocarcinomas, the addition of trastuzumab to a cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine doublet was reported to improve response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival, with the greatest benefit reported in the subgroup of patients with the highest expression of HER2. Cetuximab and panitumumab, two monoclonal antibodies against EGFR, and the dual EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib are currently undergoing phase III evaluation in esophagogastric cancer. We discuss the preclinical rationale for targeting human EGFRs and recent clinical reports of these targeted agents in esophagogastric cancer.
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 04/2011; 8(8):492-503. DOI:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.45 · 15.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New therapeutic approaches for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) introduce new treatment dilemmas: how best to sequence these options to maximally benefit patients, what tests to perform before and after treatment to assess disease status, and how to interpret the test results and use them to guide treatment. New and specific end points for different classes of drugs are needed to provide the information to guide these treatment decisions. In 2008, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 consensus criteria for early-phase clinical trials redefined clinical trial end points as first, to control, relieve, or eliminate disease manifestations present when treatment is started and second, to prevent or delay future disease manifestations. Disease manifestations include prostate-specific antigen (PSA), soft-tissue disease (nodes and/or viscera), bone disease (most common site of spread), and symptoms. Recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for CRPC therapies have been based on the prevent/delay end points that reflect unequivocal benefit to a patient: prolongation of life or reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs). For the practicing oncologist, the control/relieve/eliminate outcomes should serve primarily to inform the decision of whether to continue therapy. In this review, we consider individual end points such as PSA, imaging, and patient-reported outcomes in the context of the control/relieve/eliminate and prevent/delay framework. We address the time-to-event end points of metastasis prevention, SRE, time to progression, and overall survival in the context of regulatory approvals. We also discuss circulating tumor cells measured with the CellSearch assay, recently cleared by the FDA for monitoring CRPC.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 08/2011; 29(27):3695-704. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.8648 · 18.43 Impact Factor
Show more