Article

Measurement of the aortic annulus size by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies: MITAT: official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy (Impact Factor: 1.18). 04/2011; 20(2):85-94. DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2011.557385
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We sought to determine the level of agreement and the reproducibility of two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic (2D-TTE), 2D transesophageal (2D-TEE) and real-time three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) for measurement of aortic annulus size in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Accurate preoperative assessment of the dimensions of the aortic annulus is critical for patient selection and successful implantation in those undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Annulus size was measured using 2D-TTE, 2D-TEE and RT3D-TEE in 105 patients with severe AS referred for TAVI. Agreement between echocardiographic methods and interobserver variability was assessed using the Bland-Altman method and regression analysis, respectively. The mean aortic annuli were 21,7 ± 3 mm measured with 2D-TTE, 22,6 ± 2,8 mm with 2D-TEE and 22,3 ± 2,9 mm with RT3D-TEE. The results showed a small but significant mean difference and a strong correlation between the three measurement techniques (2D-TTE vs. 2D-TEE mean difference 0,84 ± 1,85 mm, r = 0,8, p < 0,0001; 2D-TEE vs. 3D-TEE 0,27 ± 1,14 mm, r = 0,91, p < 0,02; 2D-TTE vs. 3D-TEE 0,58 ± 2,21 mm, r = 0,72, p = 0,02); however, differences between measurements amounted up to 6,1 mm. Interobserver variability for 2D-TTE and 2D-TEE was substantially higher compared with RT3D-TEE. We found significant differences in the dimensions of the aortic annulus measured by 2D-TTE, 2D-TEE and RT3D-TEE. Thus, in patients referred for TAVI, the echocardiographic method used may have an impact on TAVI strategy.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Rolf Alexander Jánosi, Feb 21, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
279 Views
  • Source
    • "A second lesson learned while gaining more TAVI experience is that 2D TEE does not respect the 3D oval shape of the aortic annulus and might lead to imprecise aortic annulus diameter measurements [6] [16] [17]. Three-dimensional TEE becomes more and more available and seems to better reflect the annular anatomy than 2D TEE [18] [19] [20] [21], and is a useful tool for aortic annulus diameter measurement. In addition, MSCT has been established as a technique for precise measurement of the complex 3D geometry of the aortic annulus including its calcification [6–10, 22]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Precise measurements of aortic annulus dimensions are crucial for prosthesis size selection in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The so-called effective diameter (derived from area) measured in multislice computed tomography (MSCT) images has evolved to be the most precise measurement tool. Usually, the operator must manually adjust the aortic annular plane. Syngo Aortic ValveGuide (Siemens Healthcare) is a new software tool that allows for automatic aortic root reconstruction and annular plane detection. The aim of this study was to compare the effective diameter measured in automatically detected and manually adjusted annular plane. Seventy-three raw image datasets of preoperative TAVI MSCT scans were analysed using our institutional gold standard (3Mensio Valves™) with manual annular plane adjustment and using Aortic ValveGuide with automatic annular plane detection. The aortic annular circumference was manually marked for both software tools, and the effective diameter was calculated using the formula: effective diameter = 2 × √(circumferential area/π). Automatic annulus plane detection using Syngo Aortic ValveGuide worked well in all MSCT scans. Minor manual adjustment of the detected plane was necessary in only 3 patients. The mean effective aortic annulus diameter was 23.1 ± 2.4 mm for 3Mensio and 23.3 ± 2.4 mm for Syngo Aortic ValveGuide. Bland-Altman analysis of both imaging software tools showed good agreement (mean difference of 0.16 mm and limits of agreement of -0.48 to 0.80 mm). Effective aortic annulus diameter measured with Syngo Aortic ValveGuide, as a new imaging software that allows for automatic aortic annular plane detection, shows good agreement to gold standard measurements. Automatic annulus plane detection might reduce the effort for MSCT analysis and may lead to more reproducible aortic annulus measurements. Aortic ValveGuide is part of the DynaCT and in future aortic annulus dimension measurements may be feasible during intraoperatively acquired DynaCT.
    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 01/2014; DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezt600 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neue Kathetertechniken zur Behandlung von strukturellen Herzerkrankungen haben dazu geführt, dass immer mehr Patienten, die für einen operativen Eingriff nicht geeignet sind, interventionell behandelt werden können. Die Echokardiographie spielt dabei nicht nur für die präprozedurale Auswahl dieser Patienten, sondern insbesondere auch für das intraprozedurale Monitoring eine essenzielle Rolle, um eine sichere Durchführung der Interventionen zu gewährleisten. Echokardiographische 2-D- und 3-D-Techniken sind daher neben der konventionellen Röntgendurchleuchtung fester Bestandteil der Bildgebung im Herzkatheterlabor geworden. Diese Übersichtsarbeit soll neue Entwicklungen beim Einsatz der Echokardiographie während Katheterinterventionen im Kontext der aktuellen Literatur und neuer Empfehlungen darstellen.
    Herz 02/2013; 38(1). DOI:10.1007/s00059-012-3750-6 · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a viable treatment option in high-risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. The widespread uses of TAVI procedures in recent years and the steadily growing evolution of numerous new catheter-based devices have led to a remarkable shift in the treatment of this patients group towards TAVI procedures. Several developments have now overcome most of the initial problems with the early devices and have been quickly implemented in clinical routine. Nevertheless, several current TAVI systems have shown a number of limitations and disadvantages relating to valve design, the occurrence of paravalvular leakages, valve positioning and deployment, the occurrence of thromboembolic events during the procedure, as well as vascular or conduction complications. As a result, all current efforts in further development focus primarily on the following issues: (1) the further miniaturization of catheter devices and sheaths not only to facilitate transarterial but also transapical access; (2) the development of a broad variety of valve sizes to cover all aortic annulus sizes; (3) the development of retrievable, repositionable and removable systems; (4) the development or modification of stent design to prevent or reduce paravalvular leakages; (5) the implementation of modern imaging and navigation tools; (6) and finally, the initial development of prophylactic devices to prevent thromboembolic events. The present article provides a review of current developments in the field of TAVI.
    Herz 11/2011; 36(8):696-704. DOI:10.1007/s00059-011-3534-4 · 0.91 Impact Factor
Show more