Article

Measurement of the aortic annulus size by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies: MITAT: official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy (Impact Factor: 1.18). 04/2011; 20(2):85-94. DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2011.557385
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We sought to determine the level of agreement and the reproducibility of two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic (2D-TTE), 2D transesophageal (2D-TEE) and real-time three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) for measurement of aortic annulus size in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Accurate preoperative assessment of the dimensions of the aortic annulus is critical for patient selection and successful implantation in those undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Annulus size was measured using 2D-TTE, 2D-TEE and RT3D-TEE in 105 patients with severe AS referred for TAVI. Agreement between echocardiographic methods and interobserver variability was assessed using the Bland-Altman method and regression analysis, respectively. The mean aortic annuli were 21,7 ± 3 mm measured with 2D-TTE, 22,6 ± 2,8 mm with 2D-TEE and 22,3 ± 2,9 mm with RT3D-TEE. The results showed a small but significant mean difference and a strong correlation between the three measurement techniques (2D-TTE vs. 2D-TEE mean difference 0,84 ± 1,85 mm, r = 0,8, p < 0,0001; 2D-TEE vs. 3D-TEE 0,27 ± 1,14 mm, r = 0,91, p < 0,02; 2D-TTE vs. 3D-TEE 0,58 ± 2,21 mm, r = 0,72, p = 0,02); however, differences between measurements amounted up to 6,1 mm. Interobserver variability for 2D-TTE and 2D-TEE was substantially higher compared with RT3D-TEE. We found significant differences in the dimensions of the aortic annulus measured by 2D-TTE, 2D-TEE and RT3D-TEE. Thus, in patients referred for TAVI, the echocardiographic method used may have an impact on TAVI strategy.

Full-text

Available from: Rolf Alexander Jánosi, Feb 21, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
264 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a relevant common valve disorder. Severe AS and symptoms and/or left ventricular dysfunction (EF <50%) have the indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Majority of the patients with AS are elderly often with co-morbidities and generally have high preoperative risk. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is offered in this group. Four different sizes of Corevalve prosthesis are available. Correct measurement of aortic size prior to TAVI is of great important to choose the right prosthesis size to avoid among others paravalvular leak or prosthesis patient mismatch.Aim of the study is to assess the aortic annulus diameter in patients undergoing TAVI by biplane (BP) mode using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and compare it to two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 2DTEE using three-dimensional (3D) TEE as reference method. METHODS: The study population consisted of 50 patients retrospectively (24 men and 26 women, mean age 85+/-8 years of age) who all had undergone echocardiography examination prior to TAVI. RESULTS: The mean aortic annulus diameter was 20.4+/-2.2 mm with TTE, 22.3+/-2.5 mm with 2DTEE, 22.9+/-1.9 mm with BP-mode and 23.1+/-1.9 mm with 3DTEE. TTE underestimated the mean aortic annulus diameter in comparison to transesophageal imaging modalities (p<0.001). Using 3DTEE, 2% of patients were unsuitable for TAVI due to a too-small AoA (n=1). This figure was similar with BP (4%, n=2; p=1.00) but considerably larger with 2DTTE (36%, n=18; p < 0.001) and 2DTEE (12%, n=6; p=0.06). There was a strong correlation between BP-mode and 3DTEE for assessment of aortic annulus diameter (r-value 0.88) with small mean difference (-0.2+/-0.9 mm) whereas the other modalities showed larger 95% confidence interval and modest correlation (2DTTE vs. 3DTEE, -6.3 to 0.9 mm, r=0.64 and 2DTEE vs. 3DTEE, -4.8 to 3.2 mm, r=0.61). CONCLUSION: A multi-dimensional method is preferred to assess aortic annulus diameter in TAVI patients since there is risk of underestimation using single plane. Biplane mode is the method of choice in view of speedy post-processing with no need for expensive dedicated software. Lastly, single plane methods lead to misclassification of patients as unsuitable for TAVI. This may be of major clinical importance.
    Cardiovascular Ultrasound 01/2013; 11(1):5. DOI:10.1186/1476-7120-11-5 · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: -Previous studies have shown cross-sectional three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) measurements to severely underestimate multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) measurements for the assessment of aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study compares annulus measurements from 3D-TEE employing off-label use of commercially available software to MDCT measurements, and assesses their ability to predict paravalvular regurgitation (PVR). -100 patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who had both contrast MDCT and 3D-TEE for annulus assessment prior to balloon-expandable TAVR were analyzed. Annulus area, perimeter, and orthogonal maximum and minimum diameters were measured. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed with mild or greater PVR as the classification variable. 3D-TEE and MDCT cross-sectional perimeter and area measurements were strongly correlated (r = 0.93-0.94, p < 0.0001), however, the small differences (≤ 1%) were statistically significant (p = 0.0002 and 0.0074, respectively). Discriminatory ability for ≥ mild PVR was good for both MDCT (area under the curve for perimeter and area cover index = 0.715 and 0.709, respectively) and 3D-TEE (area under the curve for perimeter and area cover index = 0.709 and 0.694, respectively). Differences in ROC analysis between MDCT and 3D-TEE perimeter and area cover indexes were not statistically significant (p = 0.15 and 0.35, respectively). -Annulus measurements using a new method for analyzing 3D-TEE images closely approximate those of MDCT. Annulus measurements from both modalities predict mild or greater PVR with equivalent accuracy.
    Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging 11/2013; 7(1). DOI:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001153 · 6.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study sought to evaluate whether supra-aortic angiography during preparatory balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) improves valve sizing. Current recommendations for valve size selection are based on annular measurements by transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography, but paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) is a frequent problem. Data of 270 consecutive patients with either conventional sizing (group 1, n = 167) or balloon aortic valvuloplasty-based sizing (group 2, n = 103) were compared. PAR was graded angiographically and quantitatively using several hemodynamic indices. PAR was observed in 113 patients of group 1 and 41 patients of group 2 (67.7% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.001). More than mild PAR was found in 24 (14.4%) patients of group 1 and 8 (7.8%) patients of group 2. According to pre-interventional imaging, 40 (39%) patients had a borderline annulus size, raising uncertainty regarding valve size selection. Balloon sizing resulted in selection of the bigger prosthesis in 30 (29%) and the smaller prosthesis in the remaining patients, and only 1 of these 40 patients had more than mild PAR. As predicted by the hemodynamic indices of PAR, mortality at 30 days and 1 year was less in group 2 than in group 1 (5.8% vs. 9%, p = 0.2 and 10.6% vs. 20%, p = 0.01). Preparatory balloon aortic valvuloplasty during transcatheter aortic valve implantation improves valve size selection, reduces the associated PAR, and increases survival in borderline cases.
    JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions 09/2013; 6(9):965-71. DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.006 · 7.44 Impact Factor