Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems.
Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Journal Article: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (impact factor: 3.97). 03/2011; 18(3):232-42. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000113
Abstract
To develop and validate a taxonomy of front-end CDS tools and to assess support for these tools in major commercial and internally developed EHRs.
We used a modified Delphi approach with a panel of 11 decision support experts to develop a taxonomy of 53 front-end CDS tools. Based on this taxonomy, a survey on CDS tools was sent to a purposive sample of commercial EHR vendors (n=9) and leading healthcare institutions with internally developed state-of-the-art EHRs (n=4).
Responses were received from all healthcare institutions and 7 of 9 EHR vendors (response rate: 85%). All 53 types of CDS tools identified in the taxonomy were found in at least one surveyed EHR system, but only 8 functions were present in all EHRs. Medication dosing support and order facilitators were the most commonly available classes of decision support, while expert systems (eg, diagnostic decision support, ventilator management suggestions) were the least common.
We developed and validated a comprehensive taxonomy of front-end CDS tools. A subsequent survey of commercial EHR vendors and leading healthcare institutions revealed a small core set of common CDS tools, but identified significant variability in the remainder of clinical decision support content.
Source: PubMed
Comments on this publication
ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!
Similar publications
Electronic health records and the management of women at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
The breast journal. 15 Suppl 1:S46-55.
Quality indicators for cardiovascular primary care.
The Canadian journal of cardiology. 23(5):383-8.
A quality mix: using evidence and experience to evaluate new technologies.
Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. 25(5):4-6; quiz 6-7.
National Stroke Association guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks.
Annals of neurology. 60(3):301-13.
Establishing maternal and child health data collection priorities for state and local oral health programs.
Journal of public health dentistry. 57(4):197-205.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.
Science & Research Jobs
Scientific Systems Administrator-Department of Biostatistics.
Position: Administrator
Employer: Harvard School of Public Health

