Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems.

Adam Wright, Dean F Sittig, Joan S Ash, Joshua Feblowitz, Seth Meltzer, Carmit McMullen, Ken Guappone, Jim Carpenter, Joshua Richardson, Linas Simonaitis, R Scott Evans, W Paul Nichol, Blackford Middleton

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Journal Article: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (impact factor: 3.97). 03/2011; 18(3):232-42. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000113

Abstract

Clinical decision support (CDS) is a valuable tool for improving healthcare quality and lowering costs. However, there is no comprehensive taxonomy of types of CDS and there has been limited research on the availability of various CDS tools across current electronic health record (EHR) systems.
To develop and validate a taxonomy of front-end CDS tools and to assess support for these tools in major commercial and internally developed EHRs.
We used a modified Delphi approach with a panel of 11 decision support experts to develop a taxonomy of 53 front-end CDS tools. Based on this taxonomy, a survey on CDS tools was sent to a purposive sample of commercial EHR vendors (n=9) and leading healthcare institutions with internally developed state-of-the-art EHRs (n=4).
Responses were received from all healthcare institutions and 7 of 9 EHR vendors (response rate: 85%). All 53 types of CDS tools identified in the taxonomy were found in at least one surveyed EHR system, but only 8 functions were present in all EHRs. Medication dosing support and order facilitators were the most commonly available classes of decision support, while expert systems (eg, diagnostic decision support, ventilator management suggestions) were the least common.
We developed and validated a comprehensive taxonomy of front-end CDS tools. A subsequent survey of commercial EHR vendors and leading healthcare institutions revealed a small core set of common CDS tools, but identified significant variability in the remainder of clinical decision support content.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

53 front-end CDS tools
 
9 EHR vendors
 
CDS tools
 
commercial EHR vendors
 
common CDS tools
 
diagnostic decision support
 
expert systems
 
front-end CDS tools
 
healthcare quality
 
major commercial
 
modified Delphi approach
 
one surveyed EHR system
 
order facilitators
 
purposive sample
 
response rate
 
state-of-the-art EHRs
 
subsequent survey
 
valuable tool
 
various CDS tools
 
ventilator management suggestions