Article

Principles and Strategies for Developing Network Models in Cancer

Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, 1212 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Cell (Impact Factor: 33.12). 03/2011; 144(6):864-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The flood of genome-wide data generated by high-throughput technologies currently provides biologists with an unprecedented opportunity: to manipulate, query, and reconstruct functional molecular networks of cells. Here, we outline three underlying principles and six strategies to infer network models from genomic data. Then, using cancer as an example, we describe experimental and computational approaches to infer "differential" networks that can identify genes and processes driving disease phenotypes. In conclusion, we discuss how a network-level understanding of cancer can be used to predict drug response and guide therapeutics.

Full-text

Available from: Dana Pe'er, Feb 13, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
149 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complex diseases like cancer are regulated by large, interconnected networks with many pathways affecting cell proliferation, invasion, and drug resistance. However, current cancer therapy predominantly relies on the reductionist approach of one gene-one disease. Combinations of drugs may overcome drug resistance by limiting mutations and induction of escape pathways, but given the enormous number of possible drug combinations, strategies to reduce the search space and prioritize experiments are needed. In this review, we focus on the use of computational modeling, bioinformatics and high-throughput experimental methods for discovery of drug combinations. We highlight cutting-edge systems approaches, including large-scale modeling of cell signaling networks, network motif analysis, statistical association-based models, identifying correlations in gene signatures, functional genomics, and high-throughput combination screens. We also present a list of publicly available data and resources to aid in discovery of drug combinations. Integration of these systems approaches will enable faster discovery and translation of clinically relevant drug combinations. Graphical abstract Spectrum of Systems Biology Approaches for Drug Combinations.
    Journal of Cheminformatics 02/2015; 7(1):7. DOI:10.1186/s13321-015-0055-9 · 4.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A system characterized by redundancy has various elements that are able to act in the same biological or dynamic manner, where the inhibition of one of those elements has no significant effect on the global biological outcome or on the system's dynamic behavior. Methods that aim to predict the effectiveness of cancer therapies must include evolutionary and dynamic features that would change the static view that is widely accepted. Here, we explore several important issues about mechanisms of redundancy, heterogeneity, biological importance and drug resistance and describe methodological challenges that, if overcome, would significantly contribute to cancer research. Copyright © 2015, American Association for Cancer Research.
    Cancer Research 01/2015; DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3256 · 9.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data has revealed a surprising organization of the transcriptional variability pervasive across individual neurons. In response to distinct combinations of synaptic input-type, a new organization of neuronal subtypes emerged based on transcriptional states that were aligned along a gradient of correlated gene expression. Individual neurons traverse across these transcriptional states in response to cellular inputs. However, the regulatory network interactions driving these changes remain unclear. Here we present a novel fuzzy logic-based approach to infer quantitative gene regulatory network models from highly variable single-cell gene expression data. Our approach involves developing an a priori regulatory network that is then trained against in vivo single-cell gene expression data in order to identify causal gene interactions and corresponding quantitative model parameters. Simulations of the inferred gene regulatory network response to experimentally observed stimuli levels mirrored the pattern and quantitative range of gene expression across individual neurons remarkably well. In addition, the network identification results revealed that distinct regulatory interactions, coupled with differences in the regulatory network stimuli, drive the variable gene expression patterns observed across the neuronal subtypes. We also identified a key difference between the neuronal subtype-specific networks with respect to negative feedback regulation, with the catecholaminergic subtype network lacking such interactions. Furthermore, by varying regulatory network stimuli over a wide range, we identified several cases in which divergent neuronal subtypes could be driven towards similar transcriptional states by distinct stimuli operating on subtype-specific regulatory networks. Based on these results, we conclude that heterogeneous single-cell gene expression profiles should be interpreted through a regulatory network modeling perspective in order to separate the contributions of network interactions from those of cellular inputs. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 11/2014; 117(1). DOI:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.11.004 · 3.38 Impact Factor