Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial.

Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 29.98). 03/2011; 305(11):1097-105. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.290
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT High platelet reactivity while receiving clopidogrel has been linked to cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but a treatment strategy for this issue is not well defined.
To evaluate the effect of high-dose compared with standard-dose clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity after PCI.
Randomized, double-blind, active-control trial (Gauging Responsiveness with A VerifyNow assay-Impact on Thrombosis And Safety [GRAVITAS]) of 2214 patients with high on-treatment reactivity 12 to 24 hours after PCI with drug-eluting stents at 83 centers in North America between July 2008 and April 2010.
High-dose clopidogrel (600-mg initial dose, 150 mg daily thereafter) or standard-dose clopidogrel (no additional loading dose, 75 mg daily) for 6 months.
The primary end point was the 6-month incidence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. The key safety end point was severe or moderate bleeding according to the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) definition. A key pharmacodynamic end point was the rate of persistently high on-treatment reactivity at 30 days.
At 6 months, the primary end point had occurred in 25 of 1109 patients (2.3%) receiving high-dose clopidogrel compared with 25 of 1105 patients (2.3%) receiving standard-dose clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.76; P = .97). Severe or moderate bleeding was not increased with the high-dose regimen (15 [1.4%] vs 25 [2.3%], HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.31-1.11; P = .10). Compared with standard-dose clopidogrel, high-dose clopidogrel provided a 22% (95% CI, 18%-26%) absolute reduction in the rate of high on-treatment reactivity at 30 days (62%; 95% CI, 59%-65% vs 40%; 95% CI, 37%-43%; P < .001).
Among patients with high on-treatment reactivity after PCI with drug-eluting stents, the use of high-dose clopidogrel compared with standard-dose clopidogrel did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. Identifier: NCT00645918.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel correlates with adverse outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether HTPR is a modifiable risk factor for future events is not clear. We evaluated the effect of serial clopidogrel dose adjustment based on platelet function testing (PFT) during 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using Multiplate(®) analyzer in patients with HTPR after PCI in acute coronary syndrome on clinical outcome. Eighty-seven patients were randomized to interventional (n = 43) and control group (n = 44). Blood samples for PFT were drawn at day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 and at month 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12. Clopidogrel dose was modified at each point of PFT in the interventional group with patients taking up to two additional 600 mg loading doses and a range of 75-300 mg maintenance dose to achieve and maintain optimal platelet reactivity (19-46 U). The incidence of the primary endpoint (composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and ischemic stroke) was significantly higher in the control group (36.3 vs 16.2 %; p = 0.034). There were no differences in total bleeding events (6.8 vs 4.6 %, p = ns). Patients in the interventional group maintained better P2Y12 inhibition during follow-up. We hypothesize that targeting the therapeutic window of platelet reactivity continuously throughout DAPT by dose adjustment of P2Y12 inhibitor may lead to better platelet reactivity control, and thus reduce the rate of ischemic complications in this high risk group of patients.
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 05/2014; · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several prospective studies have shown that high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a risk factor for ischemic events. All studies were insufficiently powered to detect differences in stroke between patients with HPR and those without. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available publications aimed at determining whether patients undergoing PCI with HPR are also at increased risk of stroke. We searched for prospective studies enrolling patients undergoing PCI and treated with aspirin and clopidogrel that reported on clinical relevance of HPR to adenosine diphosphate. Study end point was the rate of stroke. We also investigated whether there was an interaction on the relative risk of stroke between HPR, clinical presentation, duration of follow-up, or laboratory methods. Fourteen studies including 11,959 patients were deemed eligible. On pooled analysis, the risk of stroke was higher in patients with HPR compared with patients with no HPR (1.2% vs 0.7%, relative risk on fixed effect 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 2.80). There was no heterogeneity among the studies (I(2) = 0%, p = 0.5). Clinical presentation (p = 0.39 for interaction), duration of follow-up (p = 0.87 for interaction), and laboratory method for detection of HPR (p = 0.99 for interaction) did not affect the relative increase in the risk of stroke in patients with HPR compared with patients with no HPR. In conclusion, in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI, the presence of HPR to adenosine diphosphate is a risk factor for stroke.
    The American Journal of Cardiology 06/2014; 113(11):1807-14. · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and/or those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are essentially platelet-driven processes, underscoring the need for effective pharmacological platelet inhibition. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has been, for over a decade, the mainstay of antiplatelet management in ACS/PCI. However, atherothrombotic events continue to occur in a relevant proportion of subjects despite the benefit of this combination, which has led to the clinical development of newer and more potent antiplatelet drugs. Two of these, prasugrel and ticagrelor, have been recently approved for clinical use. The scope of this manuscript is to provide an up-to-date overview on new antiplatelet drugs in the setting of ACS and PCI, including the most recent advances on newly approved agents as well as on emerging compounds in clinical development.
    Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 06/2013; 11(s1). · 6.08 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014