Calpain-6, a microtubule-stabilizing protein, regulates Rac1 activity and cell motility through interaction with GEF-H1
Department of Physiological Chemistry and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Journal of Cell Science
(Impact Factor: 5.43).
03/2011; 124(Pt 8):1214-23. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.072561
Crosstalk between microtubules and actin filaments is crucial for various cellular functions, including cell migration, spreading and cytokinesis. The Rac1 GTPase plays a key role in such crosstalk at the leading edge of migrating cells in order to promote lamellipodial formation. However, the mechanism underlying the link between microtubules and Rac1 activation remains unclear. Here, we show that calpain-6 (CAPN6), a non-proteolytic calpain with microtubule-binding and -stabilizing activity, might participate in this crosstalk. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-induced knockdown of Capn6 in NIH 3T3 cells resulted in Rac1 activation, which promoted cell migration, spreading and lamellipodial protrusion. This increase in Rac1 activity was abolished by knockdown of the Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 (officially known as Arhgef2). CAPN6 and GEF-H1 colocalized with microtubules and also interacted with each other through specific domains. Upon knockdown of Capn6, GEF-H1 was shown to translocate from microtubules to the lamellipodial region and to interact with Rac1. By contrast, RhoA activity was decreased upon knockdown of Capn6, although low levels of active RhoA or the presence of RhoA molecules appeared to be required for the Capn6-knockdown-induced Rac1 activation. We suggest that CAPN6 acts as a potential regulator of Rac1 activity, through a mechanism involving interaction with GEF-H1, to control lamellipodial formation and cell motility.
Available from: Heather E Cunliffe
- "The Rac1-specific GEF, Arhgef6 was upregulated in Paraxis 2/2 tissue, 1.6- fold (Table 2, Fig. 2). Further, Capn6 (1.5-fold down, Table 3), coding for a microtubule-stabilizing protein, is expressed in the somites of mouse embryos (Dear and Boehm, 1999) and can promote RAC1 activity by binding ARHGEF2 (Tonami et al., 2011). The deregulation of genes encoding modifiers of RAC1 activity predicts that regulation of Rho GTPase activity by PARAXIS occurs indirectly during somitogenesis. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
Dynamic alterations in cell shape, migration, and adhesion play a central role in tissue morphogenesis during embryonic development and congenital disease. The mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition that occurs during vertebrate somitogenesis is required for proper patterning of the axial musculoskeletal system. Somitic MET is initiated in the presomitic mesoderm by PARAXIS-dependent changes in cell adhesion, cell polarity, and the composition of the extracellular matrix. However, the target genes downstream of the transcription factor PARAXIS remain poorly described.
A genome-wide comparison of gene expression in the anterior presomitic mesoderm and newly formed somites of Paraxis(-/-) embryos resulted in a set of deregulated genes enriched for factors associated with extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal organization and cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesion. The greatest change in expression was seen in fibroblast activation protein alpha (Fap), encoding a dipeptidyl peptidase capable of increasing fibronectin and collagen fiber organization in extracellular matrix. Further, downstream genes in the Wnt and Notch signaling pathways were downregulated, predicting that PARAXIS participates in positive feedback loops in both pathways.
These data demonstrate that PARAXIS initiates and stabilizes somite epithelialization by integrating signals from multiple pathways to control the reorganization of the ECM, cytoskeleton, and adhesion junctions during MET.
Developmental Dynamics 11/2013; 242(11). DOI:10.1002/dvdy.24033 · 2.38 Impact Factor
Available from: Hicham Filali
- "Calpains are intracellular, non-lysosomal, calcium-dependent, cysteine proteases that are involved in proteolysis, apoptotic cell death, necrosis and other physiological events. Calpain 6 is known to bind and stabilize microtubules in the regulation of microtubule and cytoskeletal organization during embryonic development [55,56]. In consequence, CAPN6 expression should be downregulated after birth, except for placenta and for uterine cell tumors . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The molecular pathogenic mechanisms of prion diseases are far from clear. Genomic analyses have revealed genetic biomarkers potentially involved in prion neuropathology in naturally scrapie-infected sheep, a good animal model of infectious prionopathies. However, these biomarkers must be validated in independent studies at different stages of the disease. The gene and protein expression profiles and protein distribution of six potential genetic biomarkers (i.e., CAPN6, COL1A2, COL3A1, GALA1, MT2A and MTNR1B) are presented here for both the early and terminal stages of scrapie in five different brain regions. Gene transcription changes were confirmed in the medulla oblongata, and the expression profiles were generally similar in other central nervous system regions. The changes were more substantial in clinical animals compared to preclinical animals. The expression of the CAPN6 protein increased in the spinal cord and cerebellum of the clinical and preclinical brains. The distribution of the GALA1 was identified in glial cells from the cerebellum of scrapie-infected animals, GALA1 protein expression was increased in clinical animals in the majority of regions, and the increase of MT2A was in agreement with previous reports. The downregulation of MTNR1B was especially marked in the Purkinje cells. Finally, although collagen genes were downregulated the protein immunostaining did not reveal significant changes between the scrapie-infected and control animals. In conclusion, this study of gene transcription and protein expression and distribution confirm CAPN6, GALA1, MTNR1B and MT2A as potential targets for further prion disease research.
Veterinary Research 03/2013; 44(1):14. DOI:10.1186/1297-9716-44-14 · 2.82 Impact Factor
Available from: Katalin Szaszi
- "Although most recent studies focused on RhoA activation by GEF-H1, earlier it was also shown to exert Rac-GEF activity (Ren et al., 1998). Further, Tonami et al recently showed that knockdown of calpain-6 resulted in GEF-H1-dependent Rac activation (Tonami et al., 2011). Our study provides the first example of a signalling pathway in which GEF-H1 can act both as an activator of Rac and RhoA, depending on its phosphorylation state. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Transactivation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) by Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) is a key step in mediating RhoA activation, and cytoskeleton and junction remodelling in the tubular epithelium. In this study we explored the mechanisms underlying TNF-α-induced EGFR activation. We show that TNF-α stimulates the TNF-α Convertase Enzyme (TACE/ADAM17), leading to activation of the EGFR/ERK pathway. TACE activation requires the MAP kinase p38, which is activated through the small GTPase Rac. Interestingly, TNF-α stimulates both Rac and RhoA through the exchange factor GEF-H1, but by different mechanisms. EGFR- and ERK-dependent phosphorylation at the T678 site of GEF-H1 is a prerequisite for RhoA activation only, while both Rac and RhoA activation require GEF-H1 phosphorylation on S885. Interestingly, GEF-H1-mediated Rac activation is upstream from the TACE/EGFR/ERK pathway, and regulates T678 phosphorylation. We also show that TNF-α enhances epithelial wound healing through TACE, ERK and GEF-H1. Taken together, our findings can explain the mechanisms leading to hierarchical activation of Rac and RhoA by TNF-α through a single GEF. This mechanism could coordinate GEF functions and fine-tune Rac and RhoA activation in epithelial cells, thereby promoting complex functions such as sheet migration.
Molecular biology of the cell 02/2013; 24(7). DOI:10.1091/mbc.E12-09-0661 · 4.47 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.