The effect of guided care teams on the use of health services: results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Room 693, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Archives of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 03/2011; 171(5):460-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.540
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The effect of interdisciplinary primary care teams on the use of health services by patients with multiple chronic conditions is uncertain. This study aimed to measure the effect of guided care teams on multimorbid older patients' use of health services.
Eligible patients from 3 health care systems in the Baltimore, Maryland-Washington, DC, area were cluster-randomized to receive guided care or usual care for 20 months between November 1, 2006, and June 30, 2008. Eight services of a guided care nurse working in partnership with patients' primary care physicians were provided: comprehensive assessment, evidence-based care planning, monthly monitoring of symptoms and adherence, transitional care, coordination of health care professionals, support for self-management, support for family caregivers, and enhanced access to community services. Outcome measures were frequency of use of emergency departments, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, primary care physician services, and specialty physician services.
The study included 850 older patients at high risk for using health care heavily in the future. The only statistically significant overall effect of guided care in the whole sample was a reduction in episodes of home health care (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.93). In a preplanned analysis, guided care also reduced skilled nursing facility admissions (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.89) and days (0.48; 0.28-0.84) among Kaiser-Permanente patients.
Guided care reduces the use of home health care but has little effect on the use of other health services in the short run. Its positive effect on Kaiser-Permanente patients' use of skilled nursing facilities and other health services is intriguing. Trial Registration Identifier: NCT00121940.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Care coordination within Health Care Homes (HCHs) is an evolving registered nurse role. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing nurse care coordination. The aims are to 1) describe the characteristics of patients perceived by nurse care coordinators (NCCs) to benefit from care coordination and to 2) describe interventions judged by NCCs to be most effective in caring for patients with complex chronic care needs. This study was an analysis of existing data using a qualitative descriptive design. Experienced NCCs from various practice settings participated in a focus group. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Findings indicate the importance of the cumulative impact of complex health problems, limited social support, culture and language on patients needing care coordination. Effective interventions are focused on providing holistic, relationship-based care. The identification of contextual factors juxtaposed to complex chronic health conditions holds promise as a powerful indicator of individuals needing targeted, individualized interventions.
    Applied nursing research: ANR 03/2014; 28(1). DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2014.03.004 · 1.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: De Nederlandse gezondheidszorg staat voor de uitdaging om ook voor mensen met complexe multimorbiditeit goede zorg te bieden. Het Guided Care Model, dat in de VS werd ontwikkeld, is een casemanagementmodel en omvat acht interventies om mensen met complexe multimorbiditeit vanuit de huisartsenpraktijk goede en geïntegreerde zorg te bieden. In Nederland onderzoekt Vilans in vijf huisartsenprakijken of het Guided Care Model in onze context toepasbaar is en een meerwaarde heeft. De patiëntedoelgroep bestaat niet alleen uit kwetsbare ouderen, maar ook uit jongere patiënten met multimorbiditeit. Daarnaast wordt in een breed verband van professionals, beleidsmakers, verzekeraars en onderzoekers verkend wat de mogelijkheden zijn om het model in de toekomst op grote schaal te implementeren.
    02/2013; 6(1). DOI:10.1007/s12632-013-0008-3
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Care management programmes are an effective approach to care for high risk patients with complex care needs resulting from multiple co-occurring medical and non-medical conditions. These patients are likely to be hospitalized for a potentially "avoidable" cause. Nurse-led care management programmes for high risk elderly patients showed promising results. Care management programmes based on health care assistants (HCAs) targeting adult patients with a high risk of hospitalisation may be an innovative approach to deliver cost-efficient intensified care to patients most in need. PraCMan is a cluster randomized controlled trial with primary care practices as unit of randomisation. The study evaluates a complex primary care practice-based care management of patients at high risk for future hospitalizations. Eligible patients either suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure or any combination. Patients with a high likelihood of hospitalization within the following 12 months (based on insurance data) will be included in the trial. During 12 months of intervention patients of the care management group receive comprehensive assessment of medical and non-medical needs and resources as well as regular structured monitoring of symptoms. Assessment and monitoring will be performed by trained HCAs from the participating practices. Additionally, patients will receive written information, symptom diaries, action plans and a medication plan to improve self-management capabilities. This intervention is addition to usual care. Patients from the control group receive usual care. Primary outcome is the number of all-cause hospitalizations at 12 months follow-up, assessed by insurance claims data. Secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life (SF12, EQ5D), quality of chronic illness care (PACIC), health care utilisation and costs, medication adherence (MARS), depression status and severity (PHQ-9), self-management capabilities and clinical parameters. Data collection will be performed at baseline, 12 and 24 months (12 months post-intervention). Practice-based care management for high risk individuals involving trained HCAs appears to be a promising approach to face the needs of an aging population with increasing care demands.
    Trials 06/2011; 12:163. DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-12-163 · 2.12 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)