Article

Requesting physicians' experiences regarding infectious disease consultations.

Infectious Diseases Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, F-38043, Grenoble, France.
BMC Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 3.03). 03/2011; 11:62. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-62
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Solicited consultations constitute a substantial workload for infectious disease (ID) specialists in the hospital setting. The objectives of this survey were to describe requesting physicians' experiences regarding ID consultations.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a university-affiliated hospital in France in 2009. All physicians were eligible (n = 530) and received a self-administered questionnaire. The main outcomes were reasons for request and opinion. Secondary outcomes were frequency of request and declared adherence to recommendations.
The participation rate was 44.7% (237/530). Among the responders, 187 (79%) had solicited the ID consultation service within the previous year. Ninety-three percent of the responders (173/187) were satisfied with the ID consultation. The main reasons for requesting consultations were the need for therapeutic advice (93%), quality of care improvement (73%) and the rapidity of access (61%). ID consultations were requested several times a month by 52% (72/138) of senior physicians and by 73% (36/49) of residents (p = 0.01). Self-reported adherence to diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations was 83% and 79%, respectively.
The respondent requesting physicians expressed great satisfaction regarding ID consultations that they requested principally to improve patient care and to assist in medical decision making.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectifs Conformément au nouveau Plan Antibiotique, MedQual évalue la possibilité d’organiser en Pays-de-la-Loire, un réseau de référents en antibiothérapie afin de répondre aux attentes des professionnels de santé libéraux et des établissements de santé (ES) dépourvus d’infectiologue. Méthodes Une enquête, menée en collaboration avec les antibioréférents de la Région, pendant cinq jours, a permis d’évaluer l’activité réelle en antibiologie de liaison. Quatre critères étaient retenus : origine de l’appel (interne/externe à l’ES), type de question (diagnostic/thérapeutique), temps mobilisé pour le conseil prodigué, type de conseil. Résultats Vingt antibioréférents ont participé à l’enquête. Sur les 323 questions, 81 % étaient internes à l’ES, 7,7 % provenaient d’un autre ES et 11,3 % du secteur ambulatoire ; 56,3 % des questions concernaient une stratégie thérapeutique, 21 % une aide au diagnostic et 22,6 % une aide à la fois diagnostique et thérapeutique. Les deux tiers des questions étaient traités en moins de dix minutes. Dans 68,7 % des cas, l’antibioréférent a apporté un conseil ponctuel ; 19,8 % des appels nécessitaient un suivi du patient, 6 % ont conduit à orienter le patient vers une consultation. Conclusion Ce travail démontre clairement qu’une mutualisation des antibioréférents serait d’un grand intérêt pour la Région. Près de 20 % des questions étaient externes à l’ES d’origine de l’infectiologue, ce qui démontre un réel besoin d’expertise en infectiologie. Ce réseau permettrait d’améliorer la qualité et la sécurité des soins dans une démarche de maîtrise médicalisée des dépenses de santé.
    Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses 01/2013; · 0.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate a newly implemented infectious disease (ID) consultation service in terms of patient care, outcome and antibiotic prescription and to describe factors influencing adherence to recommendations. Data from consultations during the first 6 months of the ID consultation program were collected and evaluated. Consultation requests, diagnostic results, treatment outcomes and antibiotic recommendations were categorised. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations were assessed and rated for adherence and outcome. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing adherence and treatment outcome. A total of 251 consultations were assessed. In most cases, ID specialists were asked for further advice regarding a previously initiated anti-infective treatment (N = 131, 52 %). In 54 of 195 (28 %) first consultations, the ID specialist proposed a differential diagnosis that differed from that of the working diagnoses submitted with the consultation request, and which was subsequently confirmed in 80 % of these cases. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations were made in 190 (76 %) and 240 (96 %) of the consultations, respectively. A change in the current treatment was recommended in 66 % of consultations; 37 % of recommendations were cost-saving and 26 % were cost-neutral. Compliance with diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations was rated as good by pre-specified criteria in 65 and 86 % of consultations, respectively. Treatment outcome was correlated with adherence to diagnostic recommendations (P = 0.012). Twenty-nine patients (16 %) died during the same hospital stay. Infectious disease consultations may help to establish the correct diagnosis, resulting in the appropriate treatment being provided to a severely sick patient population. Treatment outcome was improved in cases of good diagnostic adherence to the recommendations of the ID specialist.
    Infection 08/2013; · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infectious diseases referrals (IDR) is a core activity of infectious diseases departments, and is certainly the one with the greatest potential impact on the hospital due to their cross-sectional nature, and with the emergence of a bacterial resistance and antimicrobial crisis. However, there is no standard model for IDR, no official training, and evaluation is merely descriptive. Paradoxically IDR are at risk in a health system that demands more quality and efficiency. The aim of this review is to assess what is known about IDR, its definition, key features, objectives, method, and the evaluation of results, and to suggest improvements to this key activity for the infectious diseases departments and the hospital.
    Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 05/2013; · 1.48 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
17 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014