Women's uptake of Medicare Benefits Schedule of Mental Health items for general practitioners, psychologists and other allied mental health professionals

Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
The Medical journal of Australia (Impact Factor: 4.09). 02/2011; 194(4):175-9.
Source: PubMed


To quantify women's uptake of Medicare Benefits Schedule mental health items, compare characteristics of women by mental health service use, and investigate the impact on Medicare costs.
Analysis of linked survey data and Medicare records (November 2006 - December 2007) of 14 911 consenting participants of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (ALSWH) across three birth cohorts (1921-1926 ["older cohort"], 1946-1951 ["mid-age cohort"], and 1973-1978 ["younger cohort"]).
Uptake of mental health items; 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Index scores from ALSWH surveys; and patient (out-of-pocket) and benefit (government) costs from Medicare data.
A large proportion of women who reported mental health problems made no mental health claims (on the most recent survey, 88%, 90% and 99% of the younger, mid-age and older cohorts, respectively). Socioeconomically disadvantaged women were less likely to use the services. SF-36 Mental Health Index scores among women in the younger and mid-age cohorts were lowest for women who had accessed mental health items or self-reported a recent mental health condition. Mental health items are associated with higher costs to women and government.
Although there has been rapid uptake of mental health items, uptake by women with mental health needs is low and there is potential socioeconomic inequity.

Download full-text


Available from: Jennifer Stewart Williams, Feb 20, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence of poor correspondence between resources and “need” in mental health sectors is accumulating. This non-correspondence relates to the tendency for some people with mental disorders not to receive services and some people without mental disorders to use services subsidised under Medicare. Time-series Australian data are examined here and an appropriate approach is applied to measure the correspondence of Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) epidemiological surveys of mental disorders and the enumeration of consumers of mental health services under Medicare. The extent of this “structural imbalance” is determined to be extensive. This result reflects a sector beset with incomplete information. Diagnostic efficacy, and funding efficacious processes, is vital economically for the allocation of scarce mental health resources, not just clinically for efficacious therapy. Relevant policy is yet to be formulated.
    Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy 06/2011; 30(2):253-264. DOI:10.1111/j.1759-3441.2011.00118.x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Australia has a demonstrated commitment to the development of national plans and policies regarding mental health. Just how effective have these policies been in driving real reform and generating new models of effective, collaborative mental health care? This article examines some of the progress and gaps over a 20-year national planning process and considers contemporary developments affecting our federated health system. Some dangers to the trajectory of Australia's reform process become clear just when the public and political profile of mental health has reached new heights. A key gap is in relation to accountability and Australia's capacity to demonstrate clearly the real impact services have on the lives of people with a mental illness. This article gives an overview of the legacy of Australian mental health reform and presents examples of collaborative and innovative practice across mental health care, housing, employment, and quality improvement. From this analysis, the ongoing challenges for Australian mental health reform become clearer.
    International Journal of Mental Health 07/2011; 40(2):8-24. DOI:10.2307/41345349
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper, presented at the 2010 rural health researchers' National Scientific Symposium on Rural and Remote Health, provides an overview of large Australian population mental health cohort studies which have a focus on climate-related and environmental adversity, social factors and mental health. These studies highlight the value of exploiting multiple exceptional datasets to better understand the drivers of rural health, including how to use population-level research to improve health resources in non-metropolitan areas. We show how the key characteristics of rural and remote mental health might be explored by exploiting the following cohort studies: Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey; Australian Rural Mental Health Study; Hunter Community Study; and Extending Treatments, Education and Networks in Depression study. Existing cohort studies that focus on significant rural and regional characteristics can be creatively analysed to better understand geographic variation in mental health. They have the potential to move understanding beyond simple prevalence to building knowledge about the trajectories of psychological distress and determinants of mental disorders and outcomes over time.
    Australian Journal of Rural Health 08/2011; 19(4):171-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1584.2011.01208.x · 1.23 Impact Factor
Show more