Medical Bankruptcy in Massachusetts: Has Health Reform Made a Difference?

City University of New York School of Public Health, New York, 10010, USA.
The American journal of medicine (Impact Factor: 5). 03/2011; 124(3):224-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.11.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Massachusetts' recent health reform has decreased the number of uninsured, but no study has examined medical bankruptcy rates before and after the reform was implemented.
In 2009, we surveyed 199 Massachusetts bankruptcy filers regarding medical antecedents of their financial collapse using the same questions as in a 2007 survey of 2314 debtors nationwide, including 44 in Massachusetts. We designated bankruptcies as "medical" based on debtors' stated reasons for filing, income loss due to illness, and the magnitude of their medical debts.
In 2009, illness and medical bills contributed to 52.9% of Massachusetts bankruptcies, versus 59.3% of the bankruptcies in the state in 2007 (P=.44) and 62.1% nationally in 2007 (P<.02). Between 2007 and 2009, total bankruptcy filings in Massachusetts increased 51%, an increase that was somewhat less than the national norm. (The Massachusetts increase was lower than in 54 of the 93 other bankruptcy districts.) Overall, the total number of medical bankruptcies in Massachusetts increased by more than one third during that period. In 2009, 89% of debtors and all their dependents had health insurance at the time of filing, whereas one quarter of bankrupt families had experienced a recent lapse in coverage.
Massachusetts' health reform has not decreased the number of medical bankruptcies, although the medical bankruptcy rate in the state was lower than the national rate both before and after the reform.

Download full-text


Available from: Steffie Woolhandler, Aug 04, 2015
1 Follower
10 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the most fundamental characteristics of a liberal order is that both the state and the law follow the principle of personal responsibility and assign to the citizens the responsibility for the consequences of their voluntary decisions. But to rely primarily on the principle of personal responsibility in the health care system holds the danger of attributing the cause of their health problems to the already disadvantaged (“blaming the victim”) and of releasing the welfare state from its responsibility to foster social structures that support health-conscious decisions. (As supplied by publisher)
    Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 01/2012; 106(3):195–198. DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2012.03.016
  • Source
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings 10/2012; 87(10):935-43. DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.007 · 6.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Massachusetts health care reform, designed to expand coverage and access to care for vulnerable populations, serves as the model for national health reform in the United States that will be implemented in 2014. Yet, little is known about how the reform may have affected the demand for and the financial performance of safety net hospitals (SNH), the primary source of care for such populations before the reform. Using a quasi-experimental design that included all acute care hospitals in the state, we calculated changes in mean inpatient and outpatient volumes, revenue, and operating margins at SNH from the pre-reform (Fiscal Year 2006) to the post-reform (Fiscal Year 2009) period. We contrasted these changes with contemporaneous changes occurring among non-safety net hospitals (NSNH) using a difference-in-differences approach. We found that SNH in Massachusetts continue to play a disproportionately large role in caring for disadvantaged patients after reform, but that their financial performance has declined considerably compared with NSNH. Ongoing reform efforts in the United States should account for continued SNH demand among the most vulnerable patients and should be designed so as not to undermine the financial stability of SNH that meet this demand.
    International Journal of Health Services 04/2013; 43(2):321-35. DOI:10.2190/HS.43.2.h · 0.88 Impact Factor
Show more