Association of beta-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and mortality in carvedilol-treated chronic heart-failure patients

Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology Q7642, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.88). 04/2011; 71(4):556-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03868.x
Source: PubMed


Pharmacogenetics can be used as a tool for stratified pharmacological therapy in cardiovascular medicine. We investigated whether a predefined combination of the Arg389Gly polymorphism in the adrenergic β(1) -receptor gene (ADRB1) and the Gln27Glu polymorphism in the adrenergic β(2) -receptor gene (ADRB2) could predict survival in carvedilol- and metoprolol-treated chronic heart failure (HF) patients.
Five hundred and eighty-six HF patients (carvedilol n= 82, metoprolol n= 195) were genotyped for ADRB1 Arg389Gly (rs1801253) and ADRB2 Gln27Glu (rs1042714). The end-point was all-cause mortality, and median follow-up time was 6.7 years. Patients were classified into two functional genotype groups: group 1 combination of Arg389-homozygous and Gln27-carrier (46%) and group 2 any other genotype combination (54%). Results were fitted in two multivariate Cox models.
There was a significant interaction between functional genotype group and carvedilol treatment (adjusted(1) P= 0.033, adjusted(2) P= 0.040). Patients treated with carvedilol had shorter survival in functional genotype group 1 (P= 0.004; adjusted(1) hazard ratio (HR) 2.67, 95% CI 1.27, 5.59, P= 0.010; adjusted(2) HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.06, 3.95, P= 0.033). There was no interaction between genotype group and metoprolol treatment (P= 0.61), and there was no difference in overall survival between genotype groups (P= 0.69).
A combination of ADRB1 Arg389-homozygous and ADRB2 Gln27-carrier in HF patients treated with carvedilol was associated with a two-fold increase in mortality relative to all other genotype combinations. There was no difference in survival in metoprolol-treated HF patients between genotype groups. Patients in genotype group 1 may benefit more from metoprolol than carvedilol treatment.


Available from: Christian Torp-Pedersen, May 21, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The field of pharmacogenetics aims to more fully delineate the genetic basis of interindividual variation in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and adverse drug reactions. Indeed, remarkable progress has been made in the past decade, so that we now have a far greater appreciation for the genetic contribution to observed variation in drug responsiveness. We are now starting to witness the translation of findings observed in pharmacogenetic studies to their implementation for patient care as personalized medicine, where an individual patient’s genetic makeup is used to guide drug selection and dosing. Many widely utilized cardiovascular drugs have now been linked to commonly occurring heritable genetic variations referred to as single nucleotide polymorphisms to variation in observed efficacy as well as risk for toxicity. As such, the current report outlines clinically relevant evidence supporting the important role of pharmacogenetics to the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
    03/2013; 1(1). DOI:10.1007/s40142-012-0001-3
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pharmacogenetics is the search for heritable genetic polymorphisms that influence responses to drug therapy. The most important application of pharmacogenetics is to guide choosing agents with the greatest potential of efficacy and smallest risk of adverse drug reactions. Many studies focusing on drug-gene interactions have been published in recent years, some of which led to adaptation of FDA recommendations, indicating that we are on the verge of the clinical application of genetic information in drug therapy. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on pharmacogenetics of all major drug classes currently used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
    European Heart Journal 07/2011; 33(2):165-75. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr239 · 15.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Myocardial β-adrenergic receptors (βARs) are important in altering heart rate, inotropic state, and myocardial relaxation (lusitropy). The β1AR and β2AR stimulation increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate concentration with the net result of myocyte contraction, whereas β3AR stimulation results in decreased inotropy. Downregulation of β1ARs in heart failure, as well as an increased β3AR activity and density, lead to decreased cyclic adenosine monophosphate production and reduced inotropy. The βAR antagonists are commonly used in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure; however, perioperative use of βAR antagonists is controversial. Individual patient's response to beta-blocker therapy is an area of intensive research, and apart from pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and ethnic differences, genetic alterations have become more important in the last 20 years. The most common genetic variants in humans are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). There are 2 clinically relevant SNPs for the β1AR (Ser49Gly, Arg389Gly), 3 for the β2AR (Arg16Gly, Gln27Glu, Thr164Ile), and 1 for the β3AR (Trp64Arg). Although results are somewhat controversial, generally large datasets have the potential to show a relationship between βAR SNPs and outcomes such as development and progression of heart failure, coronary artery disease, vascular reactivity, hypertension, asthma, obesity, and diabetes. Although βAR SNPs may not directly cause disease, they appear to be risk factors for, and modifiers of, disease and the response to stress and drugs. In the perioperative setting, this has specifically been demonstrated for the Arg389Gly β1AR polymorphism with which patients with the Gly variant had a higher incidence of adverse perioperative events. Knowing that genetic variants play an important role, perioperative medicine will likely change from simple therapeutic intervention to a more personalized way of adrenergic receptor modulation.
    Anesthesia and analgesia 09/2011; 113(6):1305-18. DOI:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b887e · 3.47 Impact Factor
Show more