Magnetic excitations of Fe(1+y)Se(x)Te(1-x) in magnetic and superconductive phases.

Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK.
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter (Impact Factor: 2.22). 04/2010; 22(14):142202. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/14/142202
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We have used inelastic neutron scattering and muon-spin rotation to compare the low energy magnetic excitations in single crystals of superconducting Fe(1.01)Se(0.50)Te(0.50) and non-superconducting Fe(1.10)Se(0.25)Te(0.75). We confirm the existence of a spin resonance in the superconducting phase of Fe(1.01)Se(0.50)Te(0.50), at an energy of 7 meV and a wavevector of (1/2, 1/2, 0). The non-superconducting sample exhibits two incommensurate magnetic excitations at (1/2, 1/2, 0) ± (0.18, - 0.18, 0) which rise steeply in energy, but no resonance is observed at low energies. A strongly dispersive low energy magnetic excitation is also observed in Fe(1.10)Se(0.25)Te(0.75) close to the commensurate antiferromagnetic ordering wavevector (1/2 - δ, 0, 1/2), where δ≈0.03. The magnetic correlations in both samples are found to be quasi-two-dimensional in character and persist well above the magnetic (Fe(1.10)Se(0.25)Te(0.75)) and superconducting (Fe(1.01)Se(0.50)Te(0.50)) transition temperatures.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High-temperature superconductivity remains arguably the greatest enigma of condensed matter physics. The discovery of iron-based high-temperature superconductors [1, 2] has renewed the importance of understanding superconductivity in materials susceptible to magnetic order and fluctuations. Intriguingly, they show magnetic fluctuations reminiscent of superconducting (SC) cuprates [3], including a ‘resonance’ and an ‘hourglass’-shaped dispersion [4], which provides an opportunity to gain new insights into the coupling between spin fluctuations and superconductivity. In this paper, we report inelastic neutron scattering data on Fe1+yTe0.7Se0.3 using excess iron concentration to tune between an SC (y = 0.02) and a non-SC (y = 0.05) ground state. We find incommensurate spectra in both the samples but discover that in the one that becomes SC, a constriction toward a commensurate hourglass-shape develops well above Tc. Conversely, a spin gap and a concomitant spectral weight shift happen below Tc. Our results imply that the hourglass-shaped dispersion is most likely a prerequisite for superconductivity, whereas the spin gap and shift of spectral weight are the consequences of superconductivity. We explain this observation by pointing out that an inward dispersion toward the commensurate wave vector is needed for the opening of a spin gap to lower the magnetic exchange energy and hence provide the necessary condensation energy for the SC state to emerge.
    New Journal of Physics 01/2012; 14(7). · 4.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This is a review of the magnetism and superconductivity in '11'-type Fe chalcogenides, as compared to the Fe-pnictide materials. The chalcogenides show many differences from the pnictides, as might be anticipated from their very varied chemistries. These differences include stronger renormalizations that might imply stronger correlation effects as well as different magnetic ordering patterns. Nevertheless the superconducting state and mechanism for superconductivity are apparently similar for the two classes of materials. Unanswered questions and challenges to theory are emphasized.
    Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 12/2012; 13(5):054304. · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We formulate and study the three-orbital model for iron-based superconductors. Results for the band structure, Fermi surface, and the spin susceptibility in both normal and superconducting s ± states are presented. We also discuss the pairing interaction and show that the dominant part of it should come from the intraorbital scattering.
    Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 26(8). · 0.93 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Jul 10, 2014