A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Depression Versus Relaxation Training for Alcohol-Dependent Individuals With Elevated Depressive Symptoms*

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital/Brown Medical School, 345 Blackstone Boulevard, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs (Impact Factor: 2.76). 03/2011; 72(2):286-96. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.286
Source: PubMed


A previous pilot study found positive outcomes among alcohol-dependent individuals with elevated depressive symptoms who received cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression (CBT-D; n = 19) compared with a relaxation training control (RTC; n = 16). The current study represents a replication of this pilot study using a larger sample size and a longer follow-up assessment period.
Patients entering a partial hospital drug and alcohol treatment program who met criteria for alcohol dependence and elevated depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory score ≥ 15) were recruited and randomly assigned to receive eight individual sessions of CBT-D (n = 81) or RTC (n = 84).
There were significant improvements in depressive and alcohol use outcomes over time for all participants.Compared with RTC, the CBT-D condition had significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms, as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory, at the 6-week follow-up. However, this effect was inconsistent because there were no differences in the Modified Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression between conditions at that time point and there were no significant differences at any other follow-up. No significant between-group differences on alcohol use outcomes were found.
The current findings did not replicate the positive outcomes observed in the CBT-D condition in our previous pilot study. Possible explanations for why these findings were not replicated are discussed, as are theoretical and clinical implications of using CBT-D in alcohol treatment.


Available from: Kathleen M Palm Reed
  • Source
    • "The apparently high incidence of ID among patients originally diagnosed with SID (Brown et al., 2011; Nunes, 2006) has raised further concerns about the face validity and predictive value of the concept as it is currently defined. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depression commonly co-occurs with alcohol use disorders but predictors of depression treatment outcome in patients with both conditions are not well established. Outpatients with alcohol dependence and major depression (n=138) were prescribed naltrexone and randomized to citalopram or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week naturalistic outcome phase. General linear mixed models examined predictors of Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score over 24 weeks. Predictors included whether depression was independent or substance-induced, and demographic, alcohol use, and personality variables (Temperament and Character Inventory subscales). Most improvement in drinking and depression occurred between baseline and week 3. During follow-up, patients with substance-induced depression reduced their drinking more and they had better depression outcomes than those with independent depression. However, greater reduction in drinking was associated with better depression outcomes for both independent and substance-induced groups, while antidepressant therapy had no effect for either group. Baseline demographic and alcohol use variables did not predict depression outcomes. Among personality variables, high self-directedness was a strong predictor of better depression outcomes. Subjects were not abstinent at baseline. The influence of naltrexone on depression outcomes could not be tested. Alcohol dependent patients with substance-induced depression have better short term depression outcomes than those with independent depression, but this is largely because they reduce their drinking more during treatment. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 12/2014; 174C:503-510. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.052 · 3.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Interestingly, Brown et al. [9,10] observed changes in the benefit of CBT for depression across two trials depending on the treatment context: they observed that CBT was more effective relative to a relaxation control when given separately with CBT for alcohol dependence in an inpatient versus an outpatient setting. The authors concluded that a synergistic beneficial treatment effect occurred in the inpatient setting due to CBT for depression being concurrently provided with CBT for alcohol dependence, albeit delivered by separate clinicians. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major barrier to successful treatment in alcohol dependence is psychiatric comorbidity. During treatment, the time to relapse is shorter, the drop-out rate is increased, and long-term alcohol consumption is greater for those with comorbid major depression or anxiety disorder than those with an alcohol use disorder with no comorbid mental disorder. The treatment of alcohol dependence and psychological disorders is often the responsibility of different services, and this can hinder the treatment process. Accordingly, there is a need for an effective integrated treatment for alcohol dependence and comorbid anxiety and/or depression. We aim to assess the effectiveness of a specialized, integrated intervention for alcohol dependence with comorbid anxiety and/or mood disorder using a randomized design in an outpatient hospital setting. Following a three-week stabilization period (abstinence or significantly reduced consumption), participants will undergo complete formal assessment for anxiety and depression. Those patients with a diagnosis of an anxiety and/or depressive disorder will be randomized to either 1) integrated intervention (cognitive behavioral therapy) for alcohol, anxiety, and/or depression; or 2) usual counseling care for alcohol problems. Patients will then be followed up at weeks 12, 16, and 24. The primary outcome measure is alcohol consumption (total abstinence, time to lapse, and time to relapse). Secondary outcome measures include changes in alcohol dependence severity, depression, or anxiety symptoms and changes in clinician-rated severity of anxiety and depression. The study findings will have potential implications for clinical practice by evaluating the implementation of specialized integrated treatment for comorbid anxiety and/or depression in an alcohol outpatient service.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01941693.
    Addiction science & clinical practice 11/2013; 8(1):19. DOI:10.1186/1940-0640-8-19
  • Source
    • "Cornelius et al. (2011) reported that adolescents with comorbid alcohol use disorder and major depression , who had participated in a manualised nine session intervention of cognitive–behavior therapy (CBT) and motivational enhancement therapy (MET) addressing both alcohol misuse and depression, showed greater improvement in the number of criteria met for alcohol use disorder and depressive symptoms at a 2-year follow-up assessment, compared to a naturalistic comparison group who had not received CBT and MET. On the other hand, Brown et al. (2011) recently failed to replicate findings from their 1997 pilot trial (Brown, Evans, Miller, Burgess, & Mueller, 1997), which had found positive outcomes among partially hospitalized alcohol-dependent individuals with elevated depressive symptoms who received eight individual sessions of CBT for depression compared with a relaxation training control. They reported significant improvements in alcohol use and depression outcomes over time for all participants. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Integrated psychological treatment addressing co-existing alcohol misuse and depression has not been compared with single-focused treatment. This trial evaluates changes over 36months following randomization of 284 outpatients to one of four motivational interviewing and cognitive-behavior therapy (MICBT) based interventions: (1) brief integrated intervention (BI); or BI plus 9 further sessions with (2) an integrated-, (3) alcohol-, or (4) depression-focus. Outcome measures included changes in alcohol consumption, depression (BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory) and functioning (GAF: Global Assessment of Functioning), with average improvements from baseline of 21.8 drinks per week, 12.6 BDI-II units and 8.2 GAF units. Longer interventions tended to be more effective in reducing depression and improving functioning in the long-term, and in improving alcohol consumption in the short-term. Integrated treatment was at least as good as single-focused MICBT. Alcohol-focused treatment was as effective as depression-focused treatment at reducing depression and more effective in reducing alcohol misuse. The best approach seems to be an initial focus on both conditions followed by additional integrated- or alcohol-focused sessions.
    Journal of substance abuse treatment 10/2013; 46(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.001 · 2.90 Impact Factor
Show more