Palliative Care Consultation Teams Cut Hospital Costs For Medicaid Beneficiaries

Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 03/2011; 30(3):454-63. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0929
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients facing serious or life-threatening illnesses account for a disproportionately large share of Medicaid spending. We examined 2004-07 data to determine the effect on hospital costs of palliative care team consultations for patients enrolled in Medicaid at four New York State hospitals. On average, patients who received palliative care incurred $6,900 less in hospital costs during a given admission than a matched group of patients who received usual care. These reductions included $4,098 in hospital costs per admission for patients discharged alive, and $7,563 for patients who died in the hospital. Consistent with the goals of a majority of patients and their families, palliative care recipients spent less time in intensive care, were less likely to die in intensive care units, and were more likely to receive hospice referrals than the matched usual care patients. We estimate that the reductions in Medicaid hospital spending in New York State could eventually range from $84 million to $252 million annually (assuming that 2 percent and 6 percent of Medicaid patients discharged from the hospital received palliative care, respectively), if every hospital with 150 or more beds had a fully operational palliative care consultation team.

Download full-text


Available from: Diane E Meier, Aug 14, 2015
  • Source
    • "Many factors have contributed to the development of this public health mandate including the aging demographic (Kinsella & He, 2008), the epidemiology of disease with the growing prevalence of chronic illness, and the burdens on family caregivers (World Health Organization, 2004; Raveis, 2004). The last 10 years have seen a marked growth in palliative care programs in the United States, especially hospital-based programs (Connor, 2007–2008; Morrison, Maroney- Galin, Kralovec, & Meier, 2005; Morrisson et al., 2008), and good evidence that hospitals are achieving cost savings and improvements in care outcomes by introducing palliative care teams (Morrison et al., 2005, 2008, 2011; Smith et al., 2003), although a recent state-by-state survey demonstrates that about 40% of hospitals still do not have palliative care programs (Morrison & Meier, 2011). Growth in hospital-based palliative care is crucial to improving access and relieving pain and suffering at the end of life for the frail elderly, many of whom are receiving acute care services during the last year of life (Morrison et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health reform in the United States must address both access to medical services and universal insurance coverage, as well as health care cost containment. Uncontrolled health care costs will undermine improvements in access and coverage in the long-run, and will also be detrimental to other important social programs and goals. Accordingly, the authors offer an ethical perspective on health care cost control in the context of end-of-life and palliative care, an area considered by many to be a principal candidate for cost containment. However, the policy and ethical challenges may be more difficult in end-of-life care than in other areas of medicine. Here we discuss barriers to developing high quality, cost effective, and beneficial end-of-life care, and barriers to maintaining a system of decision making that respects the wishes and values of dying patients, their families, and caregivers. The authors also consider improvements in present policy and practice-such as increased timely access and referral to hospice and palliative care; improved organizational incentives and cultural attitudes to reduce the use of ineffective treatments; and improved communication among health professionals, patients, and families in the end-of-life care planning and decision-making process.
    Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care 10/2011; 7(4):300-17. DOI:10.1080/15524256.2011.623458
  • Primary care 06/2011; 38(2):xi-xii. DOI:10.1016/j.pop.2011.03.012 · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The elimination of suffering and the cure of disease are the fundamental goals of medicine. While medical advances have transformed previously fatal conditions such as cancer and heart disease into illnesses that people can live with for many years, they have not been accompanied by corresponding improvements in the quality of life for these patients and their families. Living with a serious illness should not mean living in pain or experiencing symptoms like shortness of breath, nausea, or fatigue. Yet, multiple studies over the past decade suggest that medical care for patients with advanced illness is characterized by inadequately treated physical distress; fragmented care systems; poor communication between doctors, patients, and families; and enormous strains on family caregiver and support systems. Palliative care is interdisciplinary care focused on relief of pain and other symptoms and support for best possible quality of life for patients with serious illness, and their families. It is appropriate at the point of diagnosis of a serious illness. It goes beyond hospice care to offer patients and their families treatments focused on improving quality of life while they are receiving life-prolonging and curative treatments. Palliative care programs have been shown to reduce symptoms, improve doctor-patient-family communication and satisfaction with care, as well as enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of hospital services. In the last 5 years alone the number of palliative care programs has more than doubled. This growth is in response to the increasing numbers and needs of Americans living with serious, complex and chronic illnesses, and the realities of the care responsibilities faced by their families. In order to ensure that all persons with serious illness and their families receive the quality of care they deserve, palliative care must become an integral part of the U.S. healthcare landscape. Specifically, persons facing serious illness and their families must know to request palliative care, medical professionals must have the knowledge and skills to provide palliative care, and hospitals and other healthcare institutions must be equipped to deliver and support palliative care services. The Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) and the National Palliative Care Research Center (NPCRC) are accomplishing this three-part mission by working in partnership to: 1) Develop research to serve as the knowledge base for quality clinical care and the foundation on which to build palliative care programs and systems; 2) Disseminate this knowledge to patients, families, professionals, and institutions throughout the United States and ensure that it is integrated within mainstream healthcare; and 3) Influence and collaborate with policy makers , regulatory bodies, and federal funding agencies to ensure that the healthcare infrastructure supports the continued growth and development of palliative care.
    Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 10/2011; 33 Suppl 2:S126-31. DOI:10.1097/MPH.0b013e318230dfa0 · 0.96 Impact Factor
Show more