Incremental Cost-effectiveness of Combined Therapy vs Medication Only for Youth With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor–Resistant Depression

Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97212, USA.
Archives of general psychiatry (Impact Factor: 14.48). 03/2011; 68(3):253-62. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.9
Source: PubMed


Many youth with depression do not respond to initial treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and this is associated with higher costs. More effective treatment for these youth may be cost-effective.
To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness over 24 weeks of combined cognitive behavior therapy plus switch to a different antidepressant medication vs medication switch only in adolescents who continued to have depression despite adequate initial treatment with an SSRI.
Randomized controlled trial.
Six US academic and community clinics.
Three hundred thirty-four patients aged 12 to 18 years with SSRI-resistant depression.
Participants were randomly assigned to (1) switch to a different medication only or (2) switch to a different medication plus cognitive behavior therapy.
Clinical outcomes were depression-free days (DFDs), depression-improvement days (DIDs), and quality-adjusted life-years based on DFDs (DFD-QALYs). Costs of intervention, nonprotocol services, and families were included.
Combined treatment achieved 8.3 additional DFDs (P = .03), 0.020 more DFD-QALYs (P = .03), and 11.0 more DIDs (P = .04). Combined therapy cost $1633 more (P = .01). Cost per DFD was $188 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] = $188; 95% confidence interval [CI], -$22 to $1613), $142 per DID (ICER = $142; 95% CI, -$14 to $2529), and $78,948 per DFD-QALY (ICER = $78,948; 95% CI, -$9261 to $677,448). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve analyses suggest a 61% probability that combined treatment is more cost-effective at a willingness to pay $100,000 per QALY. Combined treatment had a higher net benefit for subgroups of youth without a history of abuse, with lower levels of hopelessness, and with comorbid conditions.
For youth with SSRI-resistant depression, combined treatment decreases the number of days with depression and is more costly. Depending on a decision maker's willingness to pay, combined therapy may be cost-effective, particularly for some subgroups. Identifier: NCT00018902.

39 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adolescent depression is a chronic, pervasive, and disabling problem that is often under-recognized and under-treated. The objective of this article is to review recent (over the past 12-18 months) literature on the management of depression in adolescents, with a particular focus on pharmacological and psychological treatments as well as community and internet-based prevention and treatment programmes. The tendency for depression in young people to be associated with a number of other disorders and behaviours, including anxiety, suicide, conduct disorder and substance abuse, compounds the complexity of management and can contribute to a negative long-term impact on adult mental health. Results of recent randomized controlled trials have reinforced our understanding that the management of moderate-to-severe depression in adolescents should be assertive and prompt, typically including a combination of psychological and pharmacological interventions. While the development of novel treatments is evolving, there is an urgent need to focus on defining the optimal use of available therapies and tailoring these to individual presentations, as well as upon improving identification of adolescent depressive disorders in the community.
    Current opinion in psychiatry 01/2012; 25(1):7-13. DOI:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32834de3bd · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to describe the effects of the pediatric antidepressant controversy on the Treatment of Serotonin-Selective Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA) trial. Adolescents, ages 12-18 years, with SSRI resistant depression were randomized to one of four treatments for a 12 week trial: Switch to different SSRI, switch to an alternate antidepressant (venlafaxine), switch to an alternate SSRI plus cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), or switch to venlafaxine plus CBT. The health advisories and "black box" warnings regarding suicidality and antidepressants in adolescents occurred during the course of the TORDIA trial. Revisions to the protocol, multiple-consent form changes, and re-consenting of patients were necessary. Recruitment of participants was adversely affected. Despite a cascade of unforeseen events that delayed the completion of the study, the TORDIA trial resulted in clinically important information about treatment-resistant depression in adolescents.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology 02/2012; 22(1):5-10. DOI:10.1089/cap.2011.0045 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although multiple medications and some forms of psychotherapy have demonstrated efficacy for major depression, many patients have persistent symptoms and experience relapse. Combination treatment has been employed by clinicians who believe that it provides the maximal potential for sustained remission and increased treatment adherence. Research suggests that although many patients may respond to a single approach, combined treatment should be strongly considered for patients with chronic depression (other than dysthymia), a history of trauma, or accompanying personality disorders. Further studies are essential to better determine the best treatments or combination of treatments for particular depressive disorders.
    The Psychiatric clinics of North America 03/2012; 35(1):165-79. DOI:10.1016/j.psc.2011.10.002 · 1.87 Impact Factor
Show more