Article

National Outbreak of Salmonella Serotype Saintpaul Infections: Importance of Texas Restaurant Investigations in Implicating Jalapeño Peppers

Aga Khan University, Pakistan
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 02/2011; 6(2):e16579. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016579
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In May 2008, PulseNet detected a multistate outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype Saintpaul infections. Initial investigations identified an epidemiologic association between illness and consumption of raw tomatoes, yet cases continued. In mid-June, we investigated two clusters of outbreak strain infections in Texas among patrons of Restaurant A and two establishments of Restaurant Chain B to determine the outbreak's source.
We conducted independent case-control studies of Restaurant A and B patrons. Patients were matched to well controls by meal date. We conducted restaurant environmental investigations and traced the origin of implicated products. Forty-seven case-patients and 40 controls were enrolled in the Restaurant A study. Thirty case-patients and 31 controls were enrolled in the Restaurant Chain B study. In both studies, illness was independently associated with only one menu item, fresh salsa (Restaurant A: matched odds ratio [mOR], 37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2-386; Restaurant B: mOR, 13; 95% CI 1.3-infinity). The only ingredient in common between the two salsas was raw jalapeño peppers. Cultures of jalapeño peppers collected from an importer that supplied Restaurant Chain B and serrano peppers and irrigation water from a Mexican farm that supplied that importer with jalapeño and serrano peppers grew the outbreak strain.
Jalapeño peppers, contaminated before arrival at the restaurants and served in uncooked fresh salsas, were the source of these infections. Our investigations, critical in understanding the broader multistate outbreak, exemplify an effective approach to investigating large foodborne outbreaks. Additional measures are needed to reduce produce contamination.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Samir V Sodha, Jul 10, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
169 Views
  • Source
    • "l . , 2006 Europe 2007 Salmonella Baby spinach 354 Denny et al . , 2007 North America , Europe 2007 Salmonella Basil 51 Pezzoli et al . , 2007 Australia , Europe 2007 Shigella sonnei Baby carrots 230 Lewis et al . , 2007 Europe 2007 Salmonella Alfalfa sprouts 45 Emberland et al . , 2007 USA , Canada 2008 Salmonella Peppers 1442 ( 2 ) CDC , 2008b ; Mody et al . , 2011 USA , Canada 2008 E . coli O157 : H7 Lettuce 134 Warriner and Namvar , 2010 UK 2008 Salmonella Basil 32 Elviss et al . , 2009 USA 2008"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ncreased consumption, larger scale production and more efficient distribution of fresh produce over the past two decades have contributed to an increase in the number of illness outbreaks caused by this commodity. Pathogen contamination of fresh produce may originate before or after harvest, but once contaminated produce is difficult to sanitize. The prospect that some pathogens invade the vascular system of plants and establish “sub-clinical” infection needs to be better understood to enable estimation of its influence upon risk of human illness. Conventional surface sanitation methods can reduce the microbial load, but cannot eliminate pathogens if present. Chlorine dioxide, electrolyzed water, UV light, cold atmosphere plasma, hydrogen peroxide, organic acids and acidified sodium chlorite show promise, but irradiation at 1 kGy in high oxygen atmospheres may prove to be the most effective means to assure elimination of both surface and internal contamination of produce by pathogens. Pathogens of greatest current concern are Salmonella (tomatoes, seed sprouts and spices) and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on leafy greens (spinach and lettuce). This review considers new information on illness outbreaks caused by produce, identifies factors which influence their frequency and size and examines intervention effectiveness. Research needed to increase our understanding of the factors influencing microbial safety of fresh produce is addressed.
    Food Microbiology 05/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2012.04.016 · 3.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "egg-industry-facts-sheet). Fresh produce is particularly vulnerable to contamination during the " farm to fork " process and fresh eggs can be contaminated easily with SE through cracks in the shell by contact with chicken feces or by transovarian infection (Howard et al., 2011). These events could have contributed to the observed increases of foodborne outbreaks (Altekruse, Cohen, & Swerdlow, 1997), including recent Salmonella outbreaks in the US involving jalapeno peppers in 2008 (Mody et al., 2011) and a large multistate outbreak of SE that was associated with contaminated eggs (http://www. cdc.gov/salmonella/enteritidis/se_timeline_092010.pdf) in 2010. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contamination of foods, especially produce and eggs, with Salmonella spp. is a major concern for public health. Therefore the development of a rapid method for Salmonella detection in those two important food commodities is urgently needed. The main objective of our study was to develop and evaluate a multiplex TaqMan-based real time PCR assay for detection of Salmonella spp. targeting invA gene and ttrRSBCA locus. The detection limit of this assay, 13 copies of genomic invA gene and ttrRSBCA locus, was determined by 10-fold dilutions of DNA from S. Typhimurium (strain SARA9). Inclusivity and exclusivity of the assay were assessed using 101 Salmonella spp. (including all Salmonella species and subspecies) and 48 non-S. enterica strains, respectively. Samples of cilantro (coriander leaves), lettuce, parsley, spinach, tomatoes and jalapeno peppers were seeded with four different Salmonella serovars at levels of 1–20 (low level) and 10 5 (high level) CFU/25 g. The inoculated samples were assayed according to the FDA Salmonella culture method in the Bac-teriological Analytical Manual (BAM). Eggs were seeded with two different S. Enteritidis strains at the level used for the produce samples and were assayed according to the USDA Laboratory Guidebook Salmonella cul-ture method. The contaminated samples were analyzed with the multiplex TaqMan-based assay developed in this study. Comparable results were obtained by the qPCR and the two bacteriological methods. Levels as low as 2 CFU/25 g for produce were detected with the qPCR method according to the BAM and 5 CFU/100 g for eggs were detected with the qPCR method according to the USDA Laboratory Guidebook. False negatives (inhibition of PCR reaction) were ruled out through the use of a DNA internal amplification control (IAC). The qPCR multiplex assay developed in this study allows rapid and accurate detection of Salmonella spp. in six high-risk produce commodities and eggs, and has the potential to be used with other food matrices. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Food Research International 04/2012; 48(1):202. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2012.03.009 · 3.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contamination of foods, especially produce, with Salmonella spp. is a major concern for public health. Several methods are available for the detection of Salmonella in produce, but their relative efficiency for detecting Salmonella in commonly consumed vegetables, often associated with outbreaks of food poisoning, needs to be confirmed. In this study, the effectiveness of three molecular methods for detection of Salmonella in six produce matrices was evaluated and compared to the FDA microbiological detection method. Samples of cilantro (coriander leaves), lettuce, parsley, spinach, tomato, and jalapeno pepper were inoculated with Salmonella serovars at two different levels (10(5) and <10(1) CFU/25 g of produce). The inoculated produce was assayed by the FDA Salmonella culture method (Bacteriological Analytical Manual) and by three molecular methods: quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Comparable results were obtained by these four methods, which all detected as little as 2 CFU of Salmonella cells/25 g of produce. All control samples (not inoculated) were negative by the four methods. RT-qPCR detects only live Salmonella cells, obviating the danger of false-positive results from nonviable cells. False negatives (inhibition of either qPCR or RT-qPCR) were avoided by the use of either a DNA or an RNA amplification internal control (IAC). Compared to the conventional culture method, the qPCR, RT-qPCR, and LAMP assays allowed faster and equally accurate detection of Salmonella spp. in six high-risk produce commodities.
    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 07/2011; 77(18):6495-501. DOI:10.1128/AEM.00520-11 · 3.95 Impact Factor
Show more