Article

Selection criteria for internal medicine residency applicants and professionalism ratings during internship.

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.81). 03/2011; 86(3):197-202. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0655
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine whether standardized admissions data in residents' Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) submissions were associated with multisource assessments of professionalism during internship.
ERAS applications for all internal medicine interns (N=191) at Mayo Clinic entering training between July 1, 2005, and July 1, 2008, were reviewed by 6 raters. Extracted data included United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, medicine clerkship grades, class rank, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, advanced degrees, awards, volunteer activities, research experiences, first author publications, career choice, and red flags in performance evaluations. Medical school reputation was quantified using U.S. News & World Report rankings. Strength of comparative statements in recommendation letters (0 = no comparative statement, 1 = equal to peers, 2 = top 20%, 3 = top 10% or "best") were also recorded. Validated multisource professionalism scores (5-point scales) were obtained for each intern. Associations between application variables and professionalism scores were examined using linear regression.
The mean ± SD (minimum-maximum) professionalism score was 4.09 ± 0.31 (2.13-4.56). In multivariate analysis, professionalism scores were positively associated with mean strength of comparative statements in recommendation letters (β = 0.13; P = .002). No other associations between ERAS application variables and professionalism scores were found.
Comparative statements in recommendation letters for internal medicine residency applicants were associated with professionalism scores during internship. Other variables traditionally examined when selecting residents were not associated with professionalism. These findings suggest that faculty physicians' direct observations, as reflected in letters of recommendation, are useful indicators of what constitutes a best student. Residency selection committees should scrutinize applicants' letters for strongly favorable comparative statements.

Full-text

Available from: Mira T Keddis, Apr 12, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
105 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) Standardized Letter of Recommendation (SLOR) has become the primary tool used by emergency medicine (EM) faculty to evaluate residency candidates. A survey was created to describe the training, beliefs, and usage patterns of SLOR writers.
    06/2014; 6(2):301-6. DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-13-00299
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence-based practice in education requires high-quality evidence, and many in the medical education community have called for an improvement in the methodological quality of education research. Our aim was to use a valid measure of medical education research quality to highlight the methodological quality of research publications and provide an overview of the recent internal medicine (IM) residency literature. We searched MEDLINE and PreMEDLINE to identify English-language articles published in the United States and Canada between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011, focusing on IM residency education. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), which has demonstrated reliability and validity. Qualitative articles were excluded. Articles were ranked by quality score, and the top 25% were examined for common themes, and 2 articles within each theme were selected for in-depth presentation. The search identified 731 abstracts of which 223 articles met our inclusion criteria. The mean (±SD) MERSQI score of the 223 studies included in the review was 11.07 (±2.48). Quality scores were highest for data analysis (2.70) and lowest for study design (1.41) and validity (1.29). The themes identified included resident well-being, duty hours and resident workload, career decisions and gender, simulation medicine, and patient-centered outcomes. Our review provides an overview of the IM medical education literature for 2010-2011, highlighting 5 themes of interest to the medical education community. Study design and validity are 2 areas where improvements in methodological quality are needed, and authors should consider these when designing research protocols.
    06/2013; 5(2):203-210. DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00238.1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To study medical students' letters of recommendation (LORs) from their applications to medical school to determine whether these predicted medical school performance, because many researchers have questioned LORs' predictive validity. Method A retrospective cohort study of three consecutive graduating classes (2007-2009) at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences was performed. In each class, the 27 students who had been elected into the Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Honor Medical Society were defined as top graduates, and the 27 students with the lowest cumulative grade point average (GPA) were designated as "bottom of the class" graduates. For each student, the first three LORs (if available) in the application packet were independently coded by two blinded investigators using a comprehensive list of 76 characteristics. Each characteristic was compared with graduation status (top or bottom of the class), and those with statistical significance related to graduation status were inserted into a logistic regression model, with undergraduate GPA and Medical College Admission Test score included as control variables. Results Four hundred thirty-seven LORs were included. Of 76 LOR characteristics, 7 were associated with graduation status (P = .05), and 3 remained significant in the regression model. Being rated as "the best" among peers and having an employer or supervisor as the LOR author were associated with induction into AOA, whereas having nonpositive comments was associated with bottom of the class students. Conclusions LORs have limited value to admission committees, as very few LOR characteristics predict how students perform during medical school.
    Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 07/2014; 89(10). DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000425 · 3.47 Impact Factor