Article

Selection criteria for internal medicine residency applicants and professionalism ratings during internship

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.81). 03/2011; 86(3):197-202. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0655
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine whether standardized admissions data in residents' Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) submissions were associated with multisource assessments of professionalism during internship.
ERAS applications for all internal medicine interns (N=191) at Mayo Clinic entering training between July 1, 2005, and July 1, 2008, were reviewed by 6 raters. Extracted data included United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, medicine clerkship grades, class rank, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, advanced degrees, awards, volunteer activities, research experiences, first author publications, career choice, and red flags in performance evaluations. Medical school reputation was quantified using U.S. News & World Report rankings. Strength of comparative statements in recommendation letters (0 = no comparative statement, 1 = equal to peers, 2 = top 20%, 3 = top 10% or "best") were also recorded. Validated multisource professionalism scores (5-point scales) were obtained for each intern. Associations between application variables and professionalism scores were examined using linear regression.
The mean ± SD (minimum-maximum) professionalism score was 4.09 ± 0.31 (2.13-4.56). In multivariate analysis, professionalism scores were positively associated with mean strength of comparative statements in recommendation letters (β = 0.13; P = .002). No other associations between ERAS application variables and professionalism scores were found.
Comparative statements in recommendation letters for internal medicine residency applicants were associated with professionalism scores during internship. Other variables traditionally examined when selecting residents were not associated with professionalism. These findings suggest that faculty physicians' direct observations, as reflected in letters of recommendation, are useful indicators of what constitutes a best student. Residency selection committees should scrutinize applicants' letters for strongly favorable comparative statements.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mira T Keddis, Apr 12, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
111 Views
  • The American journal of medicine 04/2012; 125(4):421-5. DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.008 · 5.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: From pre-enrollment assessments, through medical education and post-graduate training, medical schools are trying to educate and facilitate the development of their students so that they become exemplary experts in their future fields. Yet despite the long history of medical education, scientific research has failed to provide correlations between medical schools education processes and achievements of their students. Among the greatest obstacles for this is the primary definition of achievement, and, subsequently, its characteristics and measurement. In this review we present current findings related to medical education, discuss their implications and provide suggestions for medical schools on how to get the best out of their students while facilitating their personal growth. Key words: Medical student, Collaborative learning, Social negotiation skills, Non-cognitive skills.
    05/2012; 41(1):18-25. DOI:10.5644/ama2006-124.32
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE The authors sought to assess whether Residency Training Coordinators (RTCs) can predict psychiatry residency applicants' success in obtaining a residency position. METHOD RTCs completed a rating form to measure their perceptions of the residency candidates' attentiveness, communication, attitude, and professionalism and answered the question "Would you feel comfortable seeing this person as your doctor?" These data were paired with ranking data from the National Residency Matching Program. RESULTS Residency candidates rated highly by the coordinators were more likely to be ranked by Southern Illinois University (SIU) match at SIU. A "No" answer to the question "Would you feel comfortable seeing this person as your doctor?" was especially predictive of failure to match. CONCLUSIONS RTCs can provide an important perspective on residency candidates' attentiveness, communication, attitude, and professionalism. Asking RTCs the question "Would you feel comfortable seeing this person as your doctor?" provides a simple and powerful screening tool.
    Academic Psychiatry 04/2013; DOI:10.1176/appi.ap.12030053 · 0.81 Impact Factor
Show more