Article

The number of years lived with obesity and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
International Journal of Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 9.2). 02/2011; 40(4):985-96. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyr018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The role of the duration of obesity as an independent risk factor for mortality has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyse the association between the duration of obesity and the risk of mortality.
A total of 5036 participants (aged 28-62 years) of the Framingham Cohort Study were followed up every 2 years from 1948 for up to 48 years. The association between obesity duration and all-cause and cause-specific mortality was analysed using time-dependent Cox models adjusted for body mass index. The role of biological intermediates and chronic diseases was also explored.
The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality increased as the number of years lived with obesity increased. For those who were obese for 1-4.9, 5-14.9, 15-24.9 and ≥ 25 years of the study follow-up period, adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-1.79], 1.94 (95% CI 1.71-2.20), 2.25 (95% CI 1.89-2.67) and 2.52 (95% CI 2.08-3.06), respectively, compared with those who were never obese. A dose-response relation between years of duration of obesity was also clear for all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer and other-cause mortality. For every additional 2 years of obesity, the HRs for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, cancer and other-cause mortality were 1.06 (95% CI 1.05-1.07), 1.07 (95% CI 1.05-1.08), 1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.05) and 1.07 (95% CI 1.05-1.11), respectively.
The number of years lived with obesity is directly associated with the risk of mortality. This needs to be taken into account when estimating its burden on mortality.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maximilian Pangratius de Courten, Dec 19, 2013
0 Followers
 · 
178 Views
  • Source
    • "The loading effect of chronically high levels of adiposity , body mass and lean mass appears to provide a stimulus to the antigravity muscles of the lower limb similar to resistance training of increased muscle mass (Erskine et al. 2010b) (as shown in Tables 2, 3 and 4). However, whilst 3 weeks of simulated hypergravity (Bosco 1985) would cause adaptations at a neurogenic level, the mean duration of obesity is longitudinal at 13 years (Abdullah et al. 2011), and hence, adaptations to this condition were not expected to be neural led. At the muscle level, low-load, high-volume resistance exercise has been shown to stimulate muscle protein synthesis more than traditional high-load, low-volume resistance exercise (Burd et al. 2010), and our hypothesis was that obesity would have a similar effect, thus leading to increased muscle mass and strength over time. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to establish the interplay between body mass, adiposity, ageing and determinants of skeletal muscle strength. One hundred and two untrained healthy women categorised by age into young (Y) (mean ± SD, 26.7 ± 9.4 years) vs. old (O) (65.1 ± 7.2 years) were assessed for body fat, lean mass, plantar flexion and dorsiflexion maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) torque, muscle activation capacity and antagonist muscle co-contraction. MVC torque normalised to body mass in the obese group was 35 and 29 % lower (p < 0.05) in Y and 34 and 31 % lower (p < 0.05) in O, compared with underweight and normal weight individuals, respectively. Y with ≥40 % body fat had significantly lower activation than Y with <40 % body fat (88.3 vs. 94.4 %, p < 0.05), but O did not exhibit this effect. Co-contraction was affected by ageing (16.1 % in O vs. 13.8 % in Y, p < 0.05) but not body composition. There were significant associations between markers of body composition, age, strength and activation capacity, with the strongest correlation between muscle strength and total body mass (r (2) = 0.508 in Y, p < 0.001, vs. r (2) = 0.204 in O, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the age-related loss in plantar flexion (PF) MVC torque was exacerbated in obese compared to underweight, normal weight and overweight individuals (-0.96 vs. -0.54, -0.57 and -0.57 % per year, p < 0.05). The negative impact of adiposity on muscle performance is associated with not only muscular but also neural factors. Overall, the effects of ageing and obesity on this system are somewhat cumulative.
    Age 04/2014; 36(3). DOI:10.1007/s11357-014-9652-1 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Baum and Chou (2011) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We estimate the effects of declining smoking and increasing obesity on mortality in the United States over the period 2010-2040. Data on cohort behavioral histories are integrated into these estimates. Future distributions of body mass indices are projected using transition matrices applied to the initial distribution in 2010. In addition to projections of current obesity, we project distributions of obesity when cohorts are age 25. To these distributions, we apply death rates by current and age-25 obesity status observed in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-2006. Estimates of the effects of smoking changes are based on observed relations between cohort smoking patterns and cohort death rates from lung cancer. We find that changes in both smoking and obesity are expected to have large effects on U.S. mortality. For males, the reductions in smoking have larger effects than the rise in obesity throughout the projection period. By 2040, male life expectancy at age 40 is expected to have gained 0.83 years from the combined effects. Among women, however, the two sets of effects largely offset one another throughout the projection period, with a small gain of 0.09 years expected by 2040.
    Demography 11/2013; 51(1). DOI:10.1007/s13524-013-0246-9 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "BMI appears to have a relatively minor CVD risk when presented as an independent effect in non-hierarchical models that include intermediate factors (blood pressure, lipids and diabetes) and allied factors (physical inactivity) [7] [8]. However, when these clearly dependent factors are removed from such models BMI > 30 is shown to at least double the risk of CVD death in subjects experiencing it for five years or more, with the risk rising steadily with duration of exposure [9]. Diabetes, despite being a powerful risk factor for CVD, has not been sufficiently prevalent to impact much on CVD death rates thus far. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The majority of Western countries have reported large falls in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) mortality rates since the 1970s. Yet since the 1980s, they have also experienced two-fold or three-fold increases in the prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes--both considered substantial risk factors for CVD. So why have these increasing risks apparently not impacted on CVD mortality falls? This viewpoint outlines the main factors involved; examines recent trends and apparent contradictions; offers some explanations for the trends; discusses how more usefully complex epidemiological models might lead to clearer evidence; offers some explanations for the trends; and explores the implications for CVD prevention.
    Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases: NMCD 03/2012; 22(4):307-11. DOI:10.1016/j.numecd.2012.01.005 · 3.88 Impact Factor
Show more