Association between depression and contact precautions in veterans at hospital admission

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland-Baltimore, 685 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
American journal of infection control (Impact Factor: 2.21). 03/2011; 39(2):163-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.024
Source: PubMed


Contact Precautions (CP) have been associated with depression and anxiety. We enrolled 103 patients on admission to a VA hospital and administered the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS). The mean unadjusted HADS score was 10% higher in patients on CP (14.3 vs 13.0; P = .47), and the association was stronger after adjusting for other variables (mean difference, 2.2; P = .21). Although underpowered, in the largest study to date, patients on CP tended toward more depression and anxiety. Copyright © 2011 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Download full-text


Available from: Daniel Morgan, Aug 04, 2014
38 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contact precautions, used to reduce the transmission of infectious diseases, include the wearing of gowns and gloves for room entry. Previous small studies have shown an association between contact precautions and increased symptoms of depression and anxiety. A retrospective cohort of all patients admitted to a tertiary care centre over two years was studied to assess the relationship between contact precautions and depression or anxiety. During the two-year period, there were 70,275 admissions including 28,564 unique non-intensive-care-unit (ICU), non-psychiatric admissions. After adjusting for potential confounders, contact precautions were associated with depression [odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5] but not with anxiety (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.1) in the non-ICU population. Depression was 40% more prevalent among general inpatients on contact precautions.
    The Journal of hospital infection 06/2011; 79(2):103-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.026 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity markers in sickle cell anemia (SCA) patients with and without treatment with hydroxyurea. We assessed GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms in patients and a control group. The study groups were composed of 48 subjects without hemoglobinopathies and 28 SCA patients, 13 treated with HU [SCA (+HU)], and 15 SCA patients not treated with HU [SCA (-HU)]. We observed a significant difference for GSTP1 polymorphisms in SCA patients with the V/V genotype that showed higher glutathione (GSH) and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) (p=0.0445 and p=0.0360), respectively, compared with the I/I genotype. HU use was associated with a 35.2% decrease in the lipid peroxidation levels of the SCA (+HU) group (p<0.0001). Moreover, the SCA (+HU) group showed higher TEAC as compared to the control group (p=0.002). We did not find any significant difference in glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity between the groups (p=0.76), but the catalase (CAT) activity was about 17% and 30% decreased in the SCA (+HU) and SCA (-HU) groups, respectively (p<0.00001). Whereas the plasma GSH levels were ~2 times higher in the SCA patients than the control group (p=0.0005). HU use has contributed to higher CAT activity and TEAC, and lower lipid peroxidation in patients under treatment. These findings may explain the influence of HU in ameliorating oxidative stress on SCA subjects.
    Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases 06/2011; 47(1):23-8. DOI:10.1016/j.bcmd.2011.03.004 · 2.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. To determine the association between contact precautions and depression or anxiety as well as feelings of anger, sadness, worry, happiness, or confusion. Design. Prospective frequency-matched cohort study. Setting. The University of Maryland Medical Center, a 662-bed tertiary care hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. Participants. A total of 1,876 medical and surgical patients over the age of 18 years were approached; 528 patients were enrolled from January through November 2010, and 296 patients, frequency matched by hospital unit, completed follow-up on hospital day 3. Results. The primary outcome was Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores on hospital day 3, controlling for baseline HADS scores. Secondary moods were measured with visual analog mood scale diaries. Patients under contact precautions had baseline symptoms of depression 1.3 points higher ([Formula: see text]) and anxiety 0.8 points higher ([Formula: see text]) at hospital admission using HADS. Exposure to contact precautions was not associated with increased depression ([Formula: see text]) or anxiety ([Formula: see text]) on hospital day 3. On hospital day 3, patients under contact precautions were no more likely than unexposed patients to be angry (20% vs 20%; [Formula: see text]), sad (33% vs 38%; [Formula: see text]), worried (51% vs 46%; [Formula: see text]), happy (58% vs 67%; [Formula: see text]), or confused (23% vs 24%; [Formula: see text]). Conclusions. Patients under contact precautions have more symptoms of depression and anxiety at hospital admission but do not appear to be more likely to develop depression, anxiety, or negative moods while under contact precautions. The use of contact precautions should not be restricted by the belief that contact precautions will produce more depression or anxiety.
    Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 03/2013; 34(3):251-8. DOI:10.1086/669526 · 4.18 Impact Factor
Show more