Article

Socioeconomic Status and Chemotherapy Use for Melanoma in Older People.

University of North Texas Health Science Center.
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 03/2011; DOI: 10.1017/S0714980810000796
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The study objective was to examine the association, among older persons with cutaneous melanoma, between areal socioeconomic status (SES) and receiving chemotherapy. SEER-Medicare-linked database (1,239 white men and women aged ≥ 66, with invasive melanoma [regional and distant stages]; 1991-1999) was used. SES was measured by census tract poverty level (average of 1990 and 2000 Census data). Covariates were sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, and comorbidity index. Residing in poorer SES areas was associated with a lower likelihood for receiving chemotherapy among patients in the overall sample (adjusted odds ratios = OR 0.97, 95% confidence interval = CI 0.95-0.99), and those with regional stage at diagnosis (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.98). These findings reflect socioeconomic disparities in chemotherapy use for melanoma among older white patients in the United States.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
94 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite a known optimal treatment protocol for the management of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), many patients fail to receive complete surgical resection or post-operative radiation therapy (PORT). The underlying reasons behind this disparity are unclear. Our study investigates the influence of regional health system resources on the surgical management and PORT receipt in patients with GBM. Surgical intervention, PORT receipt and patient data for patients diagnosed with GBM were obtained from the years 2004 to 2008 from the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and combined with the health system data from the Area Resource File. Four logistic models were constructed to test the effect of health system characteristics on surgical treatment choice and PORT receipt among health service areas (HSAs). We found that younger, married patients in HSAs with higher median incomes were significantly more likely to receive both gross total resection (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002) and PORT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.008). The density of radiation oncology equipped hospitals was also a significant predictor of PORT receipt (p = 0.002). Our findings suggest regional variations in of neuro-oncology services and income may have impact on GBM management. Policies aimed at narrowing disparities in treatment may need to focus on addressing regional variations in oncology resources.
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology 02/2013; · 3.12 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
45 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014