Reversibility of fixed pulmonary hypertension in left ventricular assist device support recipients

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.4). 02/2011; 40(4):971-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Conflicting data still exist concerning the reversibility of secondary severe 'fixed' pulmonary hypertension (PH) by the use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in terms of time necessary to provide a bridge to 'transplantability'.
We retrospectively reviewed 145 patients with heart failure and severe PH treated by LVAD support between 2000 and 2009. There were 133 men (91.7%) and 12 women (8.3%) with a mean age of 52.95±12.01 years. Patients were divided into two groups depending on preoperative PH reversibility. Fixed PH was defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >25 mmHg, a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >2.5 Wood Unit (WU) and a transpulmonary gradient (TPG) >12 mmHg, despite pharmacological treatment.
Fifty-six patients had fixed PH (group A) and 89 reversible PH (group B). Only 27 patients of group A underwent right heart catheterization evaluation during LVAD support; the remaining 29 patients had other contraindications to heart transplantation (HTx). The 27 patients were divided into three subgroups on the basis of examination time during LVAD support: <6 months (11 patients), between 6 and 12 months (six patients) and >12 months (10 patients). The mPAP, PVR, and TPG decreased significantly during LVAD support (mPAP, 37.26±6.35 mmHg vs 21.00±7.51 mmHg, p=0.007; PVR, 3.49±1.47 WU vs 1.53±0.66 WU, p=0.000; and TPG, 15.04±5.22 mmHg vs 7.78±3.21 mmHg, p=0.019). A significant reduction of all parameters was observed during the first 6 months and later on there was no further decrease. There were no significant differences between the three subgroups (mPAP, p=0.680; PVR, p=0.723; and TPG, p=0.679) in terms of time of reversibility. LVAD support allowed 19 patients to be transplanted.
Patients with fixed PH can be treated with LVAD support. Our data suggest that 6 months after LVAD implantation it is possible to observe an important reduction of PH and evaluate the potential transplantability of patients. Longer support does not add any effect of LVAD on PH.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background New generation continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) utilise centrifugal pumps. Data concerning their effect on patient haemodynamics, ventricular function and tissue perfusion is limited. We aimed to document these parameters following HeartWare centrifugal continuous-flow LVAD (HVAD) implantation and to assess the impact of post-operative right heart failure (RHF). Methods We reviewed 53 consecutive patients (mean age 49.5 ± 14.1yrs) with HVAD implanted in the left ventricle, at St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, between January 2007 and August 2012. Available paired right heart catheterisation (n = 35) and echocardiography (n = 39) data was reviewed to assess response of invasive haemodynamics and ventricular function to LVAD support. Results A total of 28 patients (53%) were implanted from interim mechanical circulatory support. Seventeen patients (32%) required short-term post-implant veno-pulmonary artery extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. At 100 ± 61 days post-implant, mean pulmonary artery pressure and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased from 38.8 ± 7.7 to 22.9 ± 7.7 mmHg and 28.3 ± 6.4 to 13.4 ± 5.4 mmHg respectively (p < 0.001). LV end diastolic diameter decreased from 71.3 ± 12.7 to 61.1 ± 13.7 mm and LV end-systolic diameter from 62.7 ± 12.3 to 53.9 ± 14.4 mm (p < 0.001). Aortic regurgitation remained trivial. Serum sodium increased from 133.3 ± 5.7 to 139.3 ± 2.8 mmol/L and creatinine decreased from 109.1 ± 42.5 to 74.3 ± 26.2 μmol/L (p < 0.001). Across the entire cohort, the six-month survival/transplant rate was significantly lower for RHF patients (72.2%, n = 18) compared to those without (96.9%, n = 35, p = 0.01). Conclusions HVAD support improves haemodynamics, LV dimensions and renal function. Following implantation with a centrifugal continuous-flow LVAD, RHF remains a significant risk with a tendency to worse outcomes in the short to medium term.
    Heart, Lung and Circulation 10/2014; 23(10). DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2014.04.259 · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an increasingly common treatment for end-stage systolic heart failure. However, there are limited data on how to best treat patients pharmacologically after LVAD implantation, resulting in uncertainty about which heart failure medications provide the most benefit. Still, some evidence exists that certain medical therapies can prevent remodeling and improve right ventricular and, possibly, left ventricular function. This article reviews the current literature for medical heart failure therapy in LVAD patients, and possible future treatment strategies.
    Heart Failure Clinics 10/2014; 10(4). DOI:10.1016/j.hfc.2014.07.008 · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Circulation 08/2012; 126(8):975-990. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.085761 · 14.95 Impact Factor


Available from
May 15, 2014