Article

Increase in sharps injuries in surgical settings versus nonsurgical settings after passage of national needlestick legislation.

University of Virginia, International Healthcare Worker Safety Center, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA.
AORN journal 03/2011; 93(3):322-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2011.01.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The operating room is a high-risk setting for occupational sharps injuries and bloodborne pathogen exposure. The requirement to provide safety-engineered devices, mandated by the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act of 2000, has received scant attention in surgical settings.
We analyzed percutaneous injury surveillance data from 87 hospitals in the United States from 1993 through 2006, comparing injury rates in surgical and nonsurgical settings before and after passage of the law. We identified devices and circumstances associated with injuries among surgical team members.
Of 31,324 total sharps injuries, 7,186 were to surgical personnel. After the legislation, injury rates in nonsurgical settings dropped 31.6%, but increased 6.5% in surgical settings. Most injuries were caused by suture needles (43.4%), scalpel blades (17%), and syringes (12%). Three-quarters of injuries occurred during use or passing of devices. Surgeons and residents were most often original users of the injury-causing devices; nurses and surgical technicians were typically injured by devices originally used by others.
Despite legislation and advances in sharps safety technology, surgical injuries continued to increase during the period that nonsurgical injuries decreased significantly. Hospitals should comply with requirements for the adoption of safer surgical technologies, and promote policies and practices shown to substantially reduce blood exposures to surgeons, their coworkers, and patients. Although decisions affecting the safety of the surgical team lie primarily in the surgeon's hands, there are also roles for administrators, educators, and policy makers.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Janine Jagger, May 08, 2014
3 Followers
 · 
173 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the incidence of sharps injuries among medical students, orthopedic residents/fellows, and orthopedic faculty at one institution and to determine the rate of reporting exposures. Cross-sectional survey. Surveys were completed by 44% (53/120) of medical students, 76% (23/30) of residents/fellows, and 56% (17/30) of full-time faculty. Academic medical center. Medical students, orthopedic surgery residents/fellows, full-time academic orthopedic surgery faculty. Twenty-eight percent of medical students, 83% of residents/fellows, and 100% of faculty had been exposed to a sharps injury at some point in their career; 42% of residents/fellows had experienced a sharps exposure within the past year. The most common single instrument responsible for sharps injuries among all groups was the solid-bore needle; students and residents were significantly more likely than faculty to have a sharps injury from a solid-bore needle than all other devices combined (p = 0.04). Medical students were more likely to ignore the exposure than residents/fellows (p = 0.004) or faculty (p = 0.036). Only 12.5% of medical students followed all the steps of the postexposure protocol. Sharps exposures occur among orthopedic surgeons and their trainees. Interventions are needed to increase safety among residents and medical students. Further research should evaluate factors suppressing medical student reporting of sharps exposures.
    Journal of Surgical Education 09/2013; 70(5):660-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.04.010 · 1.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) technologies and systems are gaining more popularity and greater attention in wireless communication research all over the world, due to their enormous capacity enlargement. Motivated by the need for fundamental understanding of ultimate limits of MIMO systems, this paper presents a detailed and complete derivation of MIMO capacity in frequency-nonselective fading environments by conducting a "quasi-static" analysis. Then we investigate theoretically how spatial multiplexing and spatial diversity improve MIMO capacity. Finally, simulation results are presented to illustrate the enormous capacity enlargement in MIMO systems.
    Communication Technology Proceedings, 2003. ICCT 2003. International Conference on; 05/2003
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons 08/2010; 211(2):295-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.010 · 4.45 Impact Factor