Article

Hepatocellular carcinomas 2-3 cm in diameter: transarterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation alone.

Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1, Poongnap-2dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
European journal of radiology (Impact Factor: 2.65). 02/2011; 81(3):e189-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.122
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is debate whether transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is more effective than RFA alone in the treatment of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We therefore retrospectively compared these treatments in patients with HCCs of diameter 2-3 cm.
Outcomes, including tumor progression, survival rates, and major complications, were compared in 83 patients (83 tumors) treated with combined TACE and RFA and in 231 patients (231 tumors) treated with RFA alone.
Median follow-up periods were similar in the TACE+RFA and RFA alone groups (37 vs. 38 months). During follow-up, local tumor progression was observed in 16% and 41% of tumors, respectively. The 1, 3, and 5 year local tumor progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in the TACE+RFA group (95%, 86%, and 83%, respectively) than in the RFA-alone group (78%, 61%, and 53%, respectively; P<0.001). The 1, 3, and 5 year overall survival rates, however, were similar in the TACE+RFA (93%, 72%, and 63%, respectively) and RFA (93%, 73%, and 53%, respectively) groups (P=0.545), as were the rates of major complications (1.2% vs. 0.4%).
Combined TACE and RFA was safe and provided better local tumor control than RFA alone in the treatment of 2- to 3-cm sized HCCs, although survival rates were similar.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with that of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). All possible trials comparing RFA plus TACE with RFA alone for HCC were included into this meta-analysis. We estimated the summary odds ratio (OR) with its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) to assess the effects. Nineteen eligible studies matched the selection criteria, including 1,728 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of TACE and RFA (OR1 year = 2.14, 95 % CI = 1.57-2.91, P < 0.001; OR3 years = 1.98, 95 % CI = 1.28-3.07, P = 0.001; OR5 years = 2.70, 95 % CI = 1.42-5.14, P = 0.003) were associated with higher survival rates. No evidence of publication bias was observed. High-quality evidence suggests that TACE plus RFA improve the survival rates compared with RFA alone for patients with HCC.
    Tumor Biology 11/2013; · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with surgical resection in patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranging from 2 to 5 cm. The study participants were enrolled over a period of 29 months and were comprised of 37 patients in a combined therapy group and 47 patients in a surgical resection group. RFA was performed the day after TACE, and surgical resection was performed by open laparotomy. The two groups were compared with respect to the length of hospital stay, rates of major complication, and rates of recurrence-free and overall survival. Major complications occurred more frequently in the surgical resection group (14.9%) than in the combined therapy group (2.7%). However, there was no statistical significance (p = 0.059). The rates of recurrence-free survival at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years were similar between the combined therapy group (89.2%, 75.2%, 69.4% and 69.4%, respectively) and the surgical resection group (81.8%, 68.5%, 68.5% and 65%, respectively) (p = 0.7962, log-rank test). The overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years were also similar between groups (97.3%, 86.5%, 78.4% and 78.4%, respectively, in the combined therapy group, and 95.7%, 89.4%, 84.3% and 80.3%, respectively, in the surgical resection group) (p = 0.6321, log-rank test). When compared with surgical resection for the treatment of a single HCC ranging from 2 to 5 cm, RFA combined with TACE shows similar results in terms of recurrence-free and overall survival rates.
    Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society 07/2013; 14(4):626-35. · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with that of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Randomized controlled trials comparing RFA plus TACE with RFA alone for HCC were included into this meta-analysis, and the search strategy followed the requirement of the Cochrane Library Handbook. Overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were analyzed and compared by using Review Manager (version 5). We identified 7 randomized controlled trials comprising 571 patients who were treated by RFA plus TACE versus RFA alone for HCC. Meta-analyses showed that the combination of RFA and TACE was associated with a significantly higher overall survival rates (OR1 year = 2.39, 95 % CI, 1.35-4.21, P = 0.003; OR3 years = 1.85, 95 %CI 1.26-2.71, P = 0.002), and recurrence-free survival rate (OR1 year = 2.00, 95 % CI 1.26-3.18, P = 0.003; OR3 years = 2.13, 95 %CI 1.41-3.20, P < 0.001). Additionally, the quality of the evidence was high for the 1- and 3-year survival rate; no evidence of publication bias was observed. The combination of RFA with TACE can improve the overall survival rate and the recurrence-free survival rate for patients with HCC.
    Tumor Biology 04/2014; · 2.52 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
4 Downloads
Available from
Jun 19, 2014

Similar Publications