Article

Capital Structure, Rates of Return and Financing Corporate Growth: Comparing Developed and Emerging Markets, 1994-00

SSRN Electronic Journal 03/2003; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.397001
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper provides a survey on studies that analyze the macroeconomic effects of intellectual property rights (IPR). The first part of this paper introduces different patent policy instruments and reviews their effects on R&D and economic growth. This part also discusses the distortionary effects and distributional consequences of IPR protection as well as empirical evidence on the effects of patent rights. Then, the second part considers the international aspects of IPR protection. In summary, this paper draws the following conclusions from the literature. Firstly, different patent policy instruments have different effects on R&D and growth. Secondly, there is empirical evidence supporting a positive relationship between IPR protection and innovation, but the evidence is stronger for developed countries than for developing countries. Thirdly, the optimal level of IPR protection should tradeoff the social benefits of enhanced innovation against the social costs of multiple distortions and income inequality. Finally, in an open economy, achieving the globally optimal level of protection requires an international coordination (rather than the harmonization) of IPR protection.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jack Glen, Dec 16, 2013
0 Followers
 · 
75 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using a panel data set covering a range of developed and developing countries, we show that common-law systems were more protective of shareholder interests than civil-law ones in the period 1995–2005. However, civilian systems were catching up, suggesting that legal origin was not much of an obstacle to formal convergence in shareholder protection law. We find no evidence of a positive impact of these legal changes on stock market development. Possible explanations are that laws have been overly protective of shareholders and that transplanted laws have not worked well in contexts for which they were not suited.
    Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 06/2009; 6(2):343 - 380. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01146.x · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – This paper aims to examine how unlisted companies in Ghana finance their growth and to what extent do they rely on internal finance relative to external sources of finance. Additionally, the paper seeks to investigate the determinants of the capital structure of unlisted companies in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses the Singh-Hamid methodology as well as panel data techniques to evaluate the financing decisions of unlisted companies in Ghana. Findings – The analysis shows that unlisted firms in Ghana finance most of their growth from external debt and they are also characterized by shorter debt maturity. The results also show that the dominant factors affecting the debt equity ratios of unlisted firms in Ghana are size, firm growth, tangibility, profit margin, and financial development. Research limitations/implications – Overall, the evidence in this paper suggests that standard models of corporate finance can be applicable to unlisted companies in Ghana. Practical implications – Informative when planning for future development of the small business sector of the Ghanaian economy. Originality/value – Provides empirical evidence on how unlisted companies in Ghana finance their growth and what determines their capital structure.
    Management Research Review 01/2011; 34(2):172-185. DOI:10.1108/01409171111102795