Order sets in computerized physician order entry systems: an analysis of seven sites.

Adam Wright, Dean F Sittig, James D Carpenter, Michael A Krall, Justine E Pang, Blackford Middleton

Partners HealthCare, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Journal Article: AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium 01/2010; 2010:892-6.

Abstract

Most computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems have built-in support for order sets (collections of orders grouped by a clinical purpose). Evidence and experience suggest that order sets are important tools for ordering efficiency and decision support and may influence ordering. Developing and maintaining order sets is costly, so hospitals often must prioritize which order sets can be created. We analyzed order set utilization at seven diverse sites with CPOE. The number of order sets per site ranged from 81 to 535, and the number of order set uses per discharge ranged from 0.48 to 9.89. We also compared the top ten order sets at each site, and found many commonalities, such as generic and condition-specific admission order sets, surgical sets and clinical pathways. We also found that, at each site, utilization of order sets was skewed, with a small number of order sets comprising the bulk of utilization. These findings may be useful for order sets developers, particularly in settings where resources are constrained and the most important order sets must be developed first.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

clinical purpose
 
collections
 
computerized physician order entry
 
condition-specific admission order sets
 
decision support
 
diverse sites
 
generic
 
order sets
 
order sets developers
 
orders
 
settings
 
surgical sets
 
tools
 
utilization