Comovement After Joining an Index: Spillovers of Nonfundamental Effects

Real Estate Economics (Impact Factor: 1.02). 03/2007; 35(1):57-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2007.00182.x
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This study considers the case of two overlapping categories in the context of recent category models. Specifically, we examine whether investor sentiment and market frictions specific to one category can affect the returns on assets belonging to the other category. With recent additions of several real estate investment trusts (REITs) into general stock market indices as a natural experiment, we find support for spillovers of such nonfundamental effects, as evidenced by the increased return correlation between REITs that remain outside the index and the index stocks. Further analysis reveals that market frictions play a greater role than investor sentiment. Copyright 2007 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The maximization of mutual information has been very successful at the registration of images. Unfortunately, mutual information takes only into account the relationship between individual pixels and not those of each pixel's neighborhood. Mutual information ignores spatial information. In this paper, we propose a new similarity metric called enhanced mutual information (EMI), which combines mutual information with a weighting function based on the absolute difference of corresponding pixel values. In order to reduce computational cost we also use multiresolution wavelet decomposition as a search data strategy. Experimental results show that the enhanced mutual information is not only more robust to noise than mutual information but more reliable in the registration of multitemporal images.
    Oceans, 2012; 01/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Currently, there exists relatively little research investigating the long-term association between stock and direct real estate markets. Using appropriate transaction-based property indices, this study focuses on the relationship between stock and direct real estate markets in nine Asian countries from 1980 to 2012 applying both linear and nonlinear cointegration techniques. We find empirical evidence of significantly linear cointegration between stocks and direct real estate in China, Japan and Thailand, fractional cointegration in Singapore and Hong Kong, and no evidence of cointegration in Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. It is concluded that segmentation of direct property markets from stock markets does not appear to be linked to the differences in the maturity of national financial markets and that the differing degrees of integration across Asia may instead be reflective of a range of factors impacting upon the underlying economic structures in each country.
    Applied Economics 12/2012; 46(12). · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper adopts the methodology in Bali and Cakici (Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 43, 29–58, 2008) in tracking the evolution of the relation between equity REITs’ idiosyncratic risk and their cross-sectional expected returns between 1981 and 2010. In addition to the full sample period, we study this relation for (i) January 1981–December 1992, (ii) January 1993–September 2001, (iii) November 2001–August 2008 and (iv) November 2001–December 2010 and produce empirical results for (i) all sample REITs, (ii) REITs with a price greater than $10 or (iii) REITs with a price greater than $5. Each period represents different dynamics (including the Global Financial Crisis) in the life of the REIT industry and leads to a different hypothesis. Further, we present comparative results based on the Fama-French 3- and 4-factor models. Overall, we document a negative relation between idiosyncratic risk and cross-sectional expected returns and demonstrate that this negative relation changes over time. These findings amplify the “idiosyncratic volatility puzzle,” as reported in the recent finance literature. Interestingly, REITs with a price of $5-to-$10 do well in 2009 and 2010. Further, the momentum factor appears to be influential since the first-ever listing of a REIT in the S&P500 Index in early October 2001.
    The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 01/2014; 48(3). · 0.88 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014