Article

Comovement After Joining an Index: Spillovers of Nonfundamental Effects

Real Estate Economics (Impact Factor: 1.02). 01/2007; 35(1):57-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2007.00182.x
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This study considers the case of two overlapping categories in the context of recent category models. Specifically, we examine whether investor sentiment and market frictions specific to one category can affect the returns on assets belonging to the other category. With recent additions of several real estate investment trusts (REITs) into general stock market indices as a natural experiment, we find support for spillovers of such nonfundamental effects, as evidenced by the increased return correlation between REITs that remain outside the index and the index stocks. Further analysis reveals that market frictions play a greater role than investor sentiment. Copyright 2007 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association

0 Bookmarks
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prior empirical research finds habitat effects manifest in stock pricing among firms that share headquarters cities. We empirically investigate whether trends in residential real estate prices affect headquarters-city stock pricing phenomena for companies across U.S. metro areas for 1989–2004. Specifically, we hypothesize that stocks of firms headquartered in ‘hot’ residential real estate markets experience higher returns compared to stocks of firms from ‘cold’ markets. We also hypothesize that stocks of firms headquartered in hot real estate markets display stronger return comovement with same-city stocks. We find support for these hypotheses during the 1999–2004 sample period which coincides with the start of the housing bubble of the 2000s; we find mixed results in earlier periods. Our findings indicate that city-specific home price patterns conditionally affect stock pricing of local firms, suggesting that investor behavior is influenced by localized shocks to household real estate wealth. KeywordsResidential real estate-Wealth effects-Return comovement-Headquarters city effect-Household finance
    The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 01/2012; · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Currently, there exists relatively little research investigating the long-term association between stock and direct real estate markets. Using appropriate transaction-based property indices, this study focuses on the relationship between stock and direct real estate markets in nine Asian countries from 1980 to 2012 applying both linear and nonlinear cointegration techniques. We find empirical evidence of significantly linear cointegration between stocks and direct real estate in China, Japan and Thailand, fractional cointegration in Singapore and Hong Kong, and no evidence of cointegration in Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. It is concluded that segmentation of direct property markets from stock markets does not appear to be linked to the differences in the maturity of national financial markets and that the differing degrees of integration across Asia may instead be reflective of a range of factors impacting upon the underlying economic structures in each country.
    Applied Economics 12/2012; 46(12). · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The issue of whether Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) should pursue a focused or diversified investment strategy remains an ongoing debate within both the academic and industry communities. This article considers the relationship between REITs focused on different property sectors in a Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity-Dynamic Control Correlation (GARCH-DCC) framework. The daily conditional correlations reveal that since 1990 there has been a marked upward trend in the coefficients between US REIT sub-sectors. The findings imply that REITs are behaving in a far more homogeneous manner than in the past. Furthermore, the argument that REITs should be focused in order that investors can make the diversification decision is reduced.
    Applied Financial Economics 01/2012; 22(13):1089-1109.

Full-text (4 Sources)

View
14 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014