Article

An Empirical Assessment of Country Risk Ratings and Associated Models

Journal of Economic Surveys (Impact Factor: 1.33). 02/2004; 18(4):539-588. DOI: 10.1111/j.0950-0804.2004.00230.x
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Country risk has become a topic of major concern for the international financial community over the last two decades. The importance of country ratings is underscored by the existence of several major country risk rating agencies, namely the Economist Intelligence Unit, Euromoney, Institutional Investor, International Country Risk Guide, Moody's, Political Risk Services, and Standard and Poor's. These risk rating agencies employ different methods to determine country risk ratings, combining a range of qualitative and quantitative information regarding alternative measures of economic, financial and political risk into associated composite risk ratings. However, the accuracy of any risk rating agency with regard to any or all of these measures is open to question. For this reason, it is necessary to review the literature relating to empirical country risk models according to established statistical and econometric criteria used in estimation, evaluation and forecasting. Such an evaluation permits a critical assessment of the relevance and practicality of the country risk literature. The paper also provides an international comparison of risk ratings for twelve countries from six geographic regions. These ratings are compiled by the International Country Risk Guide, which is the only rating agency to provide detailed and consistent monthly data over an extended period for a large number of countries. The time series data permit a comparative assessment of the international country risk ratings, and highlight the importance of economic, financial and political risk ratings as components of a composite risk rating. Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2004.

1 Bookmark
 · 
173 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article looks into the factors that explain foreign direct investment (FDI) in Brazil by country of origin. We collected a sample of 180 countries with and without FDI in Brazil. We use multiple estimation techniques and controls to isolate the effect of country political risk on outward foreign direct investment and show that countries with lower levels of political risk undertake more FDI in Brazil, and that features of the policy environment of home countries drive the negative relationship between risk and FDI. Furthermore, we show that the aspect of the political and institutional environment that is most likely to drive this negative relation between risk and investment into Brazil is related to the effectiveness of national governments. Our findings broaden the understanding of the puzzling influence of political risk on FDI observed in previous studies, correct for sampling and selection biases, and have substantive implications for policy design to attract FDI. Neste trabalho analisamos que características dos países de origem explicam os investimento direto estrangeiro (IDE) no Brasil. Recolhemos dados para mais de 180 países investidores e não investidores no Brasil. Recorrendo a diversas técnicas de estimação e controlando outras variáveis isolamos o efeito que o risco político de cada país tem no IDE. Concluímos que países com menor risco político têm mais apetência para investir no Brasil. Mostramos ainda que a característica do ambiente institucional e político mais relevante para explicar este resultado prende-se com os níveis de eficácia governativa por parte dos diversos governos nacionais. Os nossos resultados contribuem para a compreensão entre a relação entre risco político e IDE encontrada em estudos anteriores, corrigem alguns problemas e enviesamentos amostrais e têm implicações relevantes sobre o tipo de políticas adequadas para atrair IDE.
    Latin American research review 01/2012; · 0.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This conceptual article looks at corporate responsibility (CR) and country risk claiming that there is a relationship, and then positing the directionality of the relationship. An understanding of this relationship can help firms respond to a variety of pressures from organizations and this knowledge may help firms prevent negative media coverage with the need to “bolt” CR strategies on to existing corporate strategies. When firms have an understanding of how country risk affects them, they can plan entire clusters of CR initiatives to fulfill needs within the operating community. To understand the CR–country risk relationship, the authors build on Matten and Moon’s (2008) distinction between implicit and explicit CR. The first argument is that firms engage in no explicit CR (explicit CR that is voluntary and goes beyond legal requirement) when country risk is very high. As country risk lowers to high, firms engage in explicit CR, which creates little impact to the firm if CR must be withdrawn. The second argument is that as country risk shifts to moderate, firms commence to engage in high levels of explicit CR and low levels of implicit CR. The third argument concludes that when country risk shifts to low or very low, firms will engage in the least amount of explicit CR and the most amount of implicit CR. A set of three propositions develops these arguments.
    01/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In recent years, providing the required criteria put forward for the full membership by the union is one of the prior targets of Turkey in the European Union full membership process. The objective of this study is to be able to evaluate situations of the membership process among European countries, candidate countries and Turkey. In the data set used in the period of 2005-2010, it is seen that the global economic crisis becoming efficient towards the end of 2007 has affected both EU countries and candidate countries economically. This period which included the effect of global crisis was taken as a data set to the study in order to add the effect of global crisis into the evaluation. The study was tried to be analyzed by using artificial neural networks and decision trees algorithms by means of a variety of economic signs. For that purpose, the data between years of 2005-2010 were used in this study. Primarily, the relative importance of independent variables was found by means of multilayered artificial neural networks and then dimension reduction operation was done. The criteria thought as affecting the membership was tried to be found out by using the decision trees method.
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 01/2011; 24:808-814.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
85 Downloads
Available from
May 15, 2014