Article

An Empirical Assessment of Country Risk Ratings and Associated Models

Journal of Economic Surveys (Impact Factor: 1.33). 02/2004; 18(4):539-588. DOI: 10.1111/j.0950-0804.2004.00230.x
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Country risk has become a topic of major concern for the international financial community over the last two decades. The importance of country ratings is underscored by the existence of several major country risk rating agencies, namely the Economist Intelligence Unit, Euromoney, Institutional Investor, International Country Risk Guide, Moody's, Political Risk Services, and Standard and Poor's. These risk rating agencies employ different methods to determine country risk ratings, combining a range of qualitative and quantitative information regarding alternative measures of economic, financial and political risk into associated composite risk ratings. However, the accuracy of any risk rating agency with regard to any or all of these measures is open to question. For this reason, it is necessary to review the literature relating to empirical country risk models according to established statistical and econometric criteria used in estimation, evaluation and forecasting. Such an evaluation permits a critical assessment of the relevance and practicality of the country risk literature. The paper also provides an international comparison of risk ratings for twelve countries from six geographic regions. These ratings are compiled by the International Country Risk Guide, which is the only rating agency to provide detailed and consistent monthly data over an extended period for a large number of countries. The time series data permit a comparative assessment of the international country risk ratings, and highlight the importance of economic, financial and political risk ratings as components of a composite risk rating. Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2004.

2 Followers
 · 
209 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The liner shipping industry (LSI) is a complex and dynamic industry. With the era of unprecedented global changes, the LSI faces a variety of internal as well as external risks. Furthermore, the values of the liner shipping operators’ performances and operational reliability are not fixed and change within different environments. As a result, an appropriate dynamic model for evaluation of environmental-based risks (EBRs), which is capable of dealing with the external risks, is needed. In this study, for assessment of the values of EBRs, a generic model is constructed and a combination of different decision-making techniques such as analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy set theory (FST) is used. Furthermore, evidential reasoning (ER) is used to synthesize the belief values or degrees of linguistic variables of EBRs’ criteria. Through the proposed methodology, a decision support framework is developed for the liner shipping operators, which enables them to assess the risk value of a country or a port of call prior to investment or strategic planning. In addition, with the help of the proposed methodology, the liner shipping operators will be able to assess the overall level of existing EBRs in order to proactively facilitate continuous improvement strategies.
    Second International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM) and the Sixth International Symposium on Uncertainty, Modeling, and Analysis (ISUMA); 06/2014
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The liner shipping industry (LSI) is a complex and dynamic industry. With the era of unprecedented global changes, the LSI faces a variety of internal as well as external risks. Furthermore, the values of the liner shipping operators' performances and operational reliability are not fixed and change within different environments. As a result, an appropriate dynamic model for evaluation of environmental-based risks (EBRs), which is capable of dealing with the external risks, is needed. In this study, for assessment of the values of EBRs, a generic model is constructed and a combination of different decision-making techniques such as analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy set theory (FST) is used. Furthermore, evidential reasoning (ER) is used to synthesize the belief values or degrees of linguistic variables of EBRs' criteria. Through the proposed methodology, a decision support framework is developed for the liner shipping operators, which enables them to assess the risk value of a country or a port of call prior to investment or strategic planning. In addition, with the help of the proposed methodology, the liner shipping operators will be able to assess the overall level of existing EBRs in order to proactively facilitate continuous improvement strategies.
    Second International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM) and the Sixth International Symposium on Uncertainty, Modeling, and Analysis (ISUMA), Liverpool, United Kingdom; 07/2014

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
119 Downloads
Available from
May 15, 2014