Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Intrauterine Devices and the Contraceptive Implant

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 03/2011; 117(3):705-19. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ce2f0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The provision of effective contraception is fundamental to the practice of women's health care. The most effective methods of reversible contraception are the so-called long-acting reversible contraceptives, intrauterine devices and implants. These methods have multiple advantages over other reversible methods. Most importantly, once in place, they do not require maintenance and their duration of action is long, ranging from 3 to 10 years. Despite the advantages of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, they are infrequently used in the United States. Short-acting methods, specifically oral contraceptives and condoms, are by far the most commonly used reversible methods. A shift from the use of short-acting methods to long-acting reversible contraceptive methods could help reduce the high rate of unintended pregnancy in the United States. In this review of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, we discuss the intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant available in the United States, and we describe candidates for each method, noncontraceptive benefits, and management of complications.

  • Source
    • "It has also been reported that during 2009, over 400,000 births in the US occurred among women under 20 years of age, with 19% of those being adolescents who had already given birth to one or more children [3]. In the US, combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and condoms are the most commonly used reversible contraceptives [4] [5] [6]. This scenario is similar in Brazil, where COCs are the most prevalent (20.7%) reversible form of contraception followed by condom (4.4%) among users of contraceptive methods [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) include the copper-releasing intrauterine device (IUD), the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and implants. Despite the high contraceptive efficacy of LARCs, their prevalence of use remains low in many countries. The objective of this study was to assess the main reasons for switching from contraceptive methods requiring daily or monthly compliance to LARC methods within a Brazilian cohort. Women of 18-50 years of age using different contraceptives and wishing to switch to a LARC method answered a questionnaire regarding their motivations for switching from their current contraceptive. Continuation rates were evaluated 1 year after method initiation. Sample size was calculated at 1040 women. Clinical performance was evaluated by life table analysis. The cutoff date for analysis was May 23, 2013. Overall, 1167 women were interviewed; however, after 1 year of use, the medical records of only 1154 women were available for review. The main personal reason for switching, as reported by the women, was "fear of becoming pregnant" while the main medical reasons were nausea and vomiting and unscheduled bleeding. No pregnancies occurred during LARC use, and the main reasons for discontinuation were expulsion (in the case of the IUD and LNG-IUS) and a decision to undergo surgical sterilization (in the case of the etonogestrel-releasing implant). Continuation rate was ~95.0/100 women/year for the three methods. Most women chose a LARC method for its safety and for practical reasons, and after 1 year of use, most women continued with the method.
    Contraception 09/2013; 89(1). DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.012 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Hand 03/2013; 8(1). DOI:10.1007/s11552-012-9454-9
  • Source
    MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 04/2011; 60(13):397-400.