Article

Responses of human neutrophils to nicotine and/or Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Department of Oral Biology, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Journal of Periodontology (Impact Factor: 2.57). 02/2011; 82(10):1504-8. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.100757
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Tobacco smoking is considered a major modifiable risk factor for periodontal disease. Nicotine is the addictive ingredient in tobacco and has been shown to affect multiple cellular processes. Neutrophils are the first line of host defense and are critical cells in the maintenance of periodontal health through their role in the control of bacteria, but they can also contribute to the progression of periodontal disease by the production and release of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Virulence factors from periodontal pathogens, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), stimulate the respiratory burst of neutrophils. The objective of this study is to explore the oxidative activity of neutrophils when stimulated with Pg, nicotine, or both.
Neutrophils were separated from buffy coats by the double dextran gradient method. The generation of ROS by neutrophils was determined using luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assays. The reaction was followed for 90 minutes, and the neutrophil activation was recorded as the total integrated energy output.
The Pg and Pg plus nicotine groups had a significantly higher active and peak chemiluminescence than the nicotine group (all with P <0.0001). The Pg and Pg with nicotine groups were not significantly different (P = 0.90).
In the presence of Pg, the nicotine did not further enhance the ROS release by the neutrophils, suggesting that the bacteria induced the maximum ROS release in this model system.

3 Followers
 · 
216 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tobacco smoking is a significant risk factor for periodontal diseases. Nicotine, one of the most studied constituents in cigarette smoke, is thought to modify immune responses. Dendritic cells (DCs), which are key mediators between innate and adaptive immunity, stimulate naive T cells to differentiate to effector T-cell subsets that may be actively involved in the immunopathogenesis of periodontal diseases. In this study, we evaluated the effects of nicotine and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Porphyromonas gingivalis, alone and in combination, on the functions of human monocyte-derived DCs to elucidate the mechanism of tissue destruction of smoking-associated periodontal diseases. P. gingivalis LPS-stimulated DCs differentiated with nicotine (NiDCs) induced lower T-cell proliferation and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression, but elevated expression of programmed cell death ligand 1. Additionally, NiDCs impaired interferon-γ production but maintained interleukin (IL)-5 and IL-10 production in co-cultured T cells. Furthermore, NiDCs produced lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines compared with DCs differentiated in the absence of nicotine. Interestingly, NiDCs preferentially produced the T helper 2 (Th2)-type chemokines macrophage chemotactic protein-1 and macrophage-derived chemokine. These results suggest that the presence of nicotine during differentiation of DCs modulates the immunoregulatory functions of P. gingivalis LPS-stimulated DCs.
    European Journal Of Oral Sciences 10/2012; 120(5):408-14. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00992.x · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of cells of the innate immune system in the pathogenesis of squamous cell carcinoma has been the subject of intense research in recent years. In particular, neutrophils have been shown recently to have either a pro-tumor or anti-tumor phenotype in different cancers. Here, we review the role of neutrophils as tumor microenvironment and signaling modulators of OSCC and their possible role as biomarkers of OSCC prognosis. Current evidence supports a pro-tumor role for neutrophils in OSCC, but more research is needed to clarify the precise mechanisms involved.
    Journal of Leukocyte Biology 08/2014; 96(5). DOI:10.1189/jlb.4RU0614-294R · 4.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
239 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014