Article

Heterogeneous topographic profiles of kinetic and cell cycle regulator microsatellites in atypical (dysplastic) melanocytic nevi.

Department of Histopathology, Barts and The London Hospitals, London, UK.
Modern Pathology (Impact Factor: 6.36). 02/2011; 24(4):471-86. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.143
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Atypical (dysplastic) melanocytic nevi are clinically heterogeneous malignant melanoma precursors, for which no topographic analysis of cell kinetic, cell cycle regulators and microsatellite profile is available. We selected low-grade atypical melanocytic nevi (92), high-grade atypical melanocytic nevi (41), melanocytic nevi (18 junctional, 25 compound) and malignant melanomas (16 radial growth phase and 27 vertical growth phase). TP53, CDKN2A, CDKN1A, and CDKN1B microsatellite patterns were topographically studied after microdissection; Ki-67, TP53, CDKN2A, CDKN1A, and CDKN1B expressions and DNA fragmentation by in situ end labeling for apoptosis were topographically scored. Results were statistically analyzed. A decreasing junctional-dermal marker expression gradient was observed, directly correlating with atypical melanocytic nevus grading. High-grade atypical melanocytic nevi revealed coexistent TP53-CDKN2A-CDKN1B microsatellite abnormalities, and significantly higher junctional Ki67-TP53 expression (inversely correlated with CDKN1A-CDKN1B expression and in situ end labeling). Malignant melanomas showed coexistent microsatellite abnormalities (CDKN2A-CDKN1B), no topographic gradient, and significantly decreased expression. Melanocytic nevi and low-grade atypical melanocytic nevi revealed sporadic junctional CDKN2A microsatellite abnormalities and no significant topographic kinetic differences. High-grade atypical melanocytic nevi accumulate junctional TP53-CDKN1A-CDKN1B microsatellite abnormalities, being progression TP53-independent and better assessed in the dermis. Melanocytic nevi and low-grade atypical melanocytic nevi show low incidence of microsatellite abnormalities, and kinetic features that make progression unlikely.

0 Followers
 · 
204 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tumor heterogeneity is a confusing finding in the assessment of neoplasms, potentially resulting in inaccurate diagnostic, prognostic and predictive tests. This tumor heterogeneity is not always a random and unpredictable phenomenon, whose knowledge helps designing better tests. The biologic reasons for this intratumoral heterogeneity would then be important to understand both the natural history of neoplasms and the selection of test samples for reliable analysis. The main factors contributing to intratumoral heterogeneity inducing gene abnormalities or modifying its expression include: the gradient ischemic level within neoplasms, the action of tumor microenvironment (bidirectional interaction between tumor cells and stroma), mechanisms of intercellular transference of genetic information (exosomes), and differential mechanisms of sequence-independent modifications of genetic material and proteins. The intratumoral heterogeneity is at the origin of tumor progression and it is also the byproduct of the selection process during progression. Any analysis of heterogeneity mechanisms must be integrated within the process of segregation of genetic changes in tumor cells during the clonal expansion and progression of neoplasms. The evaluation of these mechanisms must also consider the redundancy and pleiotropism of molecular pathways, for which appropriate surrogate markers would support the presence or not of heterogeneous genetics and the main mechanisms responsible. This knowledge would constitute a solid scientific background for future therapeutic planning.
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12/2012; 13(2):1951-2011. DOI:10.3390/ijms13021951 · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 07/2012; 67(1):148-55. DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.006 · 5.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: The outcome of patients with primary melanoma (PM) cannot be completely explained based on currently adopted clinical-histopathologic criteria. In this study, we evaluated the potential prognostic value of mismatch repair protein expression in PMs. Methods: We examined the immunohistochemical staining of mismatch repair proteins in 18 benign nevi and 101 stage I to III PMs and investigated their association with tumor clinicopathologic variables and melanoma mortality. Results: Expression of MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2 was high in benign nevi and reduced in a subset of PMs. Conversely, MSH6 expression was absent or extremely low in benign nevi and increased in a subset of PMs. In the multivariate analysis, including sex, age, Breslow thickness, and ulceration, high MSH6 expression in PMs (ie, immunostaining in >20% of tumor cells) was significantly associated with an increased risk of melanoma mortality (relative risk, 3.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-12.70). Conclusions: MSH6 protein expression can be a valuable marker to improve prognosis assessment in PMs.
    American Journal of Clinical Pathology 07/2014; 142(1):121-32. DOI:10.1309/AJCPCX2D9YULBBLG · 3.01 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
181 Downloads
Available from
Jun 2, 2014