Papillomavirus capsid proteins mutually impact structure.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Virology (Impact Factor: 3.28). 02/2011; 412(2):378-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.01.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We studied a panel of mutant viruses containing wild-type and chimeric capsid HPV16 and HPV18 proteins. The mutant capsid protein expression, genome amplification, and episomal maintenance were comparable with the wild-type virus. However, the chimeric viruses varied in their titers from wild-type. We show that the intertypical mutant chimeric capsid viruses, that L2 affects the structure of L1 and that L1 affects the structure of L2 in the virion. These effects were measured using a panel of conformation-dependent neutralizing L1 MAbs and an L2 capsid surface peptide derived neutralizing antibody. These data suggest that variation of one capsid gene not only affects its own structure and antigenicity, but also affects the structure and antigenicity of the other capsid protein. Implications of our data suggest that for the continued effectiveness of a vaccine, variation in both capsid proteins need to be considered and not just the protein the vaccine is directed against.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multi-frequency Eddy current testing (ECT) system with high sensitive AMR sensor was developed. By subtracting the signals of two frequencies, the influence of lift off variance could be reduced. As a testing, a specimen of copper plate with grooves and slits was used to simulate the combustion chamber of liquid rocket and the defects. Three defects, with the width of 0.2mm, the length of 4mm and the depth of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8mm were made in the bottom of the grooves. Multi-frequency ECT experiments were done and the defects with the depth of 0.8 and 0.5mm could be successfully detected.
    Ndt & E International - NDT E INT. 01/2011; 44(5):438-441.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) infect epithelia and can lead to the development of lesions, some of which have malignant potential. HPV type 16 is the most oncogenic genotype and causes various types of cancer, including cervical, anal, and head and neck cancers. However, despite significant research, our understanding of the mechanism by which HPV16 binds to and enters host cells remains fragmented. Over several decades, many HPV receptors and entry pathways have been described. This review puts those studies in context and offers a model of HPV16 binding and entry as a framework for future research. Our model suggests that HPV16 binds to heparin-sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) either on the epithelial cell surface or basement membrane through interactions with the L1 major capsid protein. Growth factor receptors may also become activated through HSPGs/growth factor/HPV16 complexes that initiate signaling cascades during early virion-host cell interactions. After binding to HSPGs, the virion undergoes conformational changes leading to isomerization by cyclophilin B and proprotein convertase-mediated L2 minor capsid protein cleavage that increases L2 N-terminus exposure. Along with binding to HSPGs, HPV16 binds to α6 integrins, which initiate further intracellular signaling events. Following these primary binding events, HPV16 binds to a newly identified L2-specific receptor, the annexin A2 heterotetramer. Subsequently, clathrin-, caveolin-, lipid raft-, flotillin-, cholesterol-, dynamin-independent endocytosis of HPV16 occurs.
    Journal of Virology 03/2013; · 4.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Papillomaviruses (PVs) comprise a large family of viruses infecting nearly all vertebrate species, with more than 100 human PVs identified. Our previous studies showed that a mutant chimera HPV18/16 genome, consisting of the upper regulatory region and early ORFs of HPV18 and the late ORFs of HPV16, was capable of producing infectious virus in organotypic raft cultures. We were interested in determining whether the ability of this chimeric genome to produce infectious virus was the result of HPV18 and HPV16 being similarly oncogenic, anogenital types and whether more disparate PV types could also interact functionally. To test this we created a series of HPV18 chimeric genomes where the ORFs for the HPV18 capsid genes were replaced with the capsid genes of HPV45, HPV39, HPV33, HPV31, HPV11, HPV6b, HPV1a, CRPV, and BPV1. All chimeras were able to produce infectious chimeric viral particles, although with lower infectivity than wild-type HPV18. Steps in the viral life cycle and characteristics of the viral particles were examined to identify potential causes for the decrease in infectivity.
    Virus Research 07/2011; 160(1-2):246-55. · 2.83 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 17, 2014

Similar Publications