Article

Lethal Forethought: Delayed Reward Discounting Differentiates High- and Low-Lethality Suicide Attempts in Old Age

Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Biological psychiatry (Impact Factor: 9.47). 02/2011; 70(2):138-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The decision to commit suicide may be impulsive, but lethal suicidal acts often involve planning and forethought. People who attempt suicide make disadvantageous decisions in other contexts, but nothing is known about the way they decide about the future. Can the willingness to postpone future gratification differentiate between individuals prone to serious, premeditated and less serious, unplanned suicidal acts?
Four groups of depressed participants aged 60 and older made choices between smaller immediate and larger delayed monetary rewards: 15 who had made high-lethality suicide attempts, 14 who had made low-lethality suicide attempts, 12 who seriously contemplated suicide, and 42 people with depression, but no history of suicidal thoughts. The reference group was 31 psychiatrically healthy elders.
Individuals who had made low-lethality attempts displayed an exaggerated preference for immediate rewards compared with nonsuicidal depressed and healthy control subjects. Those who had carried out high-lethality suicide attempts were more willing to delay future rewards, compared with low-lethality attempters. Better planned suicide attempts were also associated with willingness to wait for larger rewards. These effects were unchanged after accounting for education, global cognitive function, substance use disorders, psychotropic medications, and possible brain injury from attempts. Discount rates were correlated with having debt, but were not significantly associated with income, hopelessness, depressive severity, premorbid IQ, age at first attempt, or choice of violent means.
Although clinicians often focus on impulsivity in patients at risk for suicide, these data suggest that identifying biological characteristics and treatments for nonimpulsive suicidal older people may be even more important.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Luke Clark, Aug 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
174 Views
  • Source
    • "Although consistent with a model in which the ability to pursue death despite discomfort is of great importance in suicidal behavior, the distress tolerance findings assess a construct that is only tangentially related to persistence . Among older adults with prior suicidal behavior , individuals with more lethal attempts persisted longer in a delay discounting task, indicating that they are more willing to persist for a greater duration to obtain a larger reward (Dombrovski et al., 2011). Although such work highlights the importance of persistence , further work considering variables specifically focused on persistence towards goals would be highly useful and two variables in particular seem to have potential worth in this regard: grit and perseverance. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT Data indicate persistence facilitates suicidal behavior. Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is characterized by difficulty persisting while upset. The relationship between NSSI and suicidal behavior thus may hinge upon persistence. Participants were 604 undergraduates (79.5% women; 42.4% African American; 6.1% with 1 + prior suicide attempt). Data were collected online via self-report and analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression. As expected, higher levels of grit and perseverance predicted more frequent suicide attempts. Furthermore, grit and perseverance moderated the relationship between NSSI and suicide attempts, which increased in magnitude as individuals reported greater persistence. Findings depict suicidal behavior as a deliberate pursuit of death.
    Death Studies 01/2015; 39(4). DOI:10.1080/07481187.2014.946629 · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Moreover, studies examining the level of planning involved in specific attempts have demonstrated a consistent (albeit not universal) inverse association between attempt impulsivity and attempt lethality (e.g., Baca-Garcia et al., 2001; Connor et al., 2006; Witte et al., 2008; Nakagawa et al., 2009; see Brown et al., 1991 for conflicting results). For example, in a sample of 83 older adult inpatients, Dombrovski et al. (2011) found that individuals with a history of suicide attempts who were better able to delay reward reported greater attempt lethality. Likewise, in a sample of 273 inpatient attempters, Monnin et al. (2012) found that violent suicide attempts were associated with less cognitive impulsivity than were nonviolent attempts. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several theories posit a direct role of impulsivity in suicidal behavior. The interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior (IPTS) argues that the relationship between impulsivity and suicidal behavior is explained by the painful and/or provocative experiences (PPEs) often encountered by impulsive individuals. It thus seems plausible that nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), itself associated with impulsivity, might account for the relationship between impulsivity and suicidal behavior. We examined data from 93 adult inpatients (54.8% male) seeking treatment for substance use disorders. Patients completed a structured interview assessing prior suicidal behavior and a series of self-report questionnaires examining impulsivity, NSSI, and psychopathology. Four impulsivity dimensions (negative urgency, positive urgency, lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance) were associated with lifetime number of suicide attempts and/or suicide potential. Furthermore, results supported our hypotheses, as all but one relation was better accounted for by NSSI and, in the one exception, the direct effect was non-significant. Findings are consistent with the IPTS and suggest suicidal behavior may not be a direct manifestation of impulsivity, but facilitated through exposure to PPEs capable of altering an individual's relationship to pain and fear of death.
    08/2014; 218(1-2). DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.031
  • Source
    • "Interestingly, low-lethality suicide attempters tended to make more uncorrected errors in all conditions, suggesting a careless approach to the task or a lack of monitoring. These results indicate that people with a history of attempted suicide display a considerable cognitive heterogeneity, which can be parsed to some extent by grouping them into high-lethality versus low-lethality attempters (Keilp et al., 2001; Dombrovski et al., 2011a; McGirr et al., 2012). Finally, we found no differences between groups for DKEFS-CWIT inhibition-switching, which it is not surprising in view of low sensitivity of this condition to individual differences in cognitive control ability (Lippa and Davis, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People who attempt suicide often display cognitive impairments, particularly poor cognitive control. Could poor cognitive control contribute to high suicide rates in old age? A component of cognitive control, cognitive inhibition—active suppression of task-irrelevant processing—is very sensitive to aging and has been linked to attempted suicide. We investigated cognitive inhibition in older high-lethality suicide attempters, closely resembling suicide victims, as well as low-lethality attempters, and control groups with and without depression and suicidal ideation. A total of 102 participants aged 60 years and older (17 psychiatrically healthy control subjects, 38 depressed control subjects, 16 suicide ideators, 14 low-lethality suicide attempters, and 17 high-lethality suicide attempters) underwent comprehensive clinical and cognitive assessments. They completed the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System Color-Word Interference Test, a validated modification of the Stroop test. High-lethality suicide attempters demonstrated a distinct pattern of cognitive inhibition deficits. Compared with psychiatrically healthy control subjects and suicide ideators, high-lethality attempters took longer to complete inhibition trials, even after accounting for potential confounding factors (age, education, Mini mental state examination score, information processing speed, and accuracy). Compared with non-suicidal depressed and healthy control subjects, low-lethality suicide attempters committed more uncorrected errors; however, this difference was not specific to the inhibition condition. Older suicide attempters are a cognitively heterogeneous group. Poor cognitive control in high-lethality attempters may undermine their ability to solve real-life problems, precipitating a catastrophic accumulation of stressors. Meanwhile, low-lethality attempters' poor performance may reflect a careless approach to the task or faulty monitoring. Copyright
    International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 05/2014; 30(3). DOI:10.1002/gps.4138 · 3.09 Impact Factor
Show more