Incontinence and Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis

University of North Dakota College of Nursing, Grand Forks, USA.
Advances in skin & wound care (Impact Factor: 1.63). 03/2011; 24(3):126-40; quiz 141-2. DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000395037.28398.6c
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Incontinence is a prevalent problem and can lead to many complications. Both urinary and fecal incontinence can result in tissue breakdown, now commonly referred to as incontinence-associated dermatitis. This article addresses the types of incontinence, its etiology and pathophysiology, assessment, prevention and treatment, and the latest research.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine interrater reliability and agreement of the diagnosis of moisture lesions as defined by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Differentiation between superficial pressure ulcers and moisture-related skin damages is difficult. To enhance the precision of the identification of moisture lesions, the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel provided wound- and patient-related characteristics. Empirical evidence regarding interrater reliability and agreement among nurses for the detection of moisture-related skin damages in clinical practice is lacking. Observational. Home care clients (n = 339) were independently assessed twice by trained nurses. A head to toe skin inspection was conducted. For the diagnosis of moisture lesion (yes/no), nurses exactly agreed in 95% of all assessed clients. Interrater reliability was intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1) = 0.67 (95% CI 0.61-0.73). Nurses were able to differentiate between home care clients with and without moisture lesions but assessment results contained a high degree of measurement error. It seems that the descriptions for the identification of moisture lesions provided by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel do support the diagnostic process but reliability must be enhanced. Because of low interrater reliability, it is questionable whether the diagnosis of moisture lesions in clinical practice is valid. Measurement error is too high to make adequate inferences for individuals. Definitions and descriptions provided by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, provisions of a single training and images are not sufficient to achieve acceptable interrater reliability in clinical practice.
    Journal of Clinical Nursing 03/2010; 19(5-6):716-20. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03109.x · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Deficiencies in the current pressure ulcer classification system create the impetus for the current discourse on the clinical, legal, and economic implications of staging and considering shifting the paradigm in pressure ulcer description and assessment.
    Advances in skin & wound care 12/2011; 24(12):571-80; quiz 581-2. DOI:10.1097/01.ASW.0000408467.26999.6d · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The damaging effects of moisture, pressure, friction, and shear on human tissue are well-known among wound care experts. Nevertheless, accurate classification of these lesions is frequently challenging, even for experienced wound clinicians. The authors gathered clinical illustrations of gluteal cleft wounds and conducted a literature search as a basis for presentation to conference attendees, with the goal of gaining consensus regarding guidelines for accurate classification of these wounds. The aim of this article was to summarize results of the consensus sessions that occurred at the Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses' Society National conferences in 2011 and 2012, and to highlight areas where consensus has been achieved as well as areas in which consensus has not yet been reached.
    Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing: official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society / WOCN 05/2013; 40(3):239-45. DOI:10.1097/WON.0b013e31828f1a2e · 1.00 Impact Factor
Show more