Article

Weight change with long-term duloxetine use in chronic painful conditions: an analysis of 16 clinical studies

United States Medical Division, Lilly USA, LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
International Journal of Clinical Practice (Impact Factor: 2.54). 03/2011; 65(3):341-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02635.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Report weight change baseline up to 12-15 months in duloxetine-treated patients during clinical trials of chronic painful conditions of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP), fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic knee pain as a result of osteoarthritis.
Weight change data from 16 duloxetine studies in chronic painful conditions were pooled by pain condition and duration, creating 10 datasets. Datasets included placebo-controlled, open-label and routine-care-controlled designs. Assessments included mean weight change from baseline, baseline body mass index category, potentially clinically significant (PCS) weight change and weight-related treatment-emergent adverse events.
Total number of patients was 5111 with mean baseline weight ranging from 70 to 97 kg. All duloxetine groups had significant mean weight loss compared with placebo at acute phase completion (p ≤ 0.001). In studies > 3 months, patients from fibromyalgia and CLBP studies had overall mean weight increase (up to 1.1 kg), whereas patients in DPNP studies had overall mean weight loss (-0.33 to -1.7 kg) at end-point. Overall, the percentage of patients with PCS weight gain was 0.4-16% and PCS weight loss was 2.5-9.9%.
Weight change data in clinical trials of patients with fibromyalgia or CLBP treated with duloxetine for up to 15 months were consistent with data reported in 10 clinical trials of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) using duloxetine up to 52 weeks. Patients with DPNP had weight loss at end-point.
Mean weight changes and percentages of patients with PCS weight loss and weight gain observed in DPNP, fibromyalgia and CLBP with long-term duloxetine treatment were consistent with those reported previously for MDD studies.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Héctor Dueñas, Oct 16, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
104 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of milnacipran on body weight in patients with fibromyalgia. ANALYSES WERE CONDUCTED IN THE FOLLOWING GROUPS: patients from three double-blind, placebo-controlled milnacipran trials (3 months, n = 2096; 6 months, n = 1008); 354 patients receiving milnacipran in placebo-controlled trials and double-blind extension studies (total ≥ 12 months of treatment); and 1227 patients in a long-term (up to 3.25 years) open-label milnacipran study. In placebo-controlled trials, 77% of patients were overweight or obese at baseline (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m(2)). Mean weight loss was found with milnacipran at 3 months (100 mg/day, -1.14 kg; 200 mg/day, -0.97 kg; placebo, -0.06 kg; P < 0.001) and 6 months (100 mg/day, -1.01 kg; 200 mg/day, -0.71 kg; placebo, -0.04 kg; P < 0.05). Approximately twice as many milnacipran-treated patients had ≥5% weight loss from baseline compared with placebo (3 and 6 months, P < 0.01). In extension studies, mean weight loss in patients receiving ≥12 months of milnacipran was -1.06 kg. In patients receiving ≥3 years of treatment in the open-label study, mean changes at 12, 24, 30, and 36-38 months were -1.16, -0.76, -0.19, and +0.11 kg, respectively. Among milnacipran-treated patients, rates of nausea (the most common adverse event) were lower among patients who lost weight than among those who did not (3 months, P = 0.02). The majority of patients with fibromyalgia in the milnacipran studies were overweight or obese. Milnacipran was associated with mean weight loss at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05 versus placebo) and at 12 and 24 months of treatment, with mean changes drifting back to baseline at 30 months (-0.19 kg) and 36-38 months (+0.11 kg, no placebo comparison).
    International Journal of General Medicine 10/2012; 5:879-87. DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S36444
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus, affecting, by some estimates, up to one quarter of diabetic patients. Since 2010, no fewer than 5 major international treatment guidelines for painful DPN have been issued, and there are meaningful differences among them. Duloxetine, pregabalin, gabapentin, and tricyclic antidepressants are the mainstays of treatment, but the choice of which class or agent to use in any given patient should be informed by patient characteristics. This review seeks to describe the differences among the recently issued guidelines, to assess the evidence on which they are based, and to offer insight into the most appropriate treatment choices based on patient characteristics.
    Journal of Diabetes and its Complications 08/2014; 29(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.08.008 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The safety and tolerability of three treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were compared.MethodsA 12-week, randomized, open-label study confirming the non-inferiority of duloxetine (N = 138) vs. pregabalin (N = 134) and the combination of duloxetine plus gabapentin (N = 135) as the primary outcome was previously published. Patients had an inadequate pain response to a stable dose of gabapentin (≥ 900 mg/day) for ≥ 5 weeks prior to study enrolment. Data from that study were assessed in this current analysis for a detailed report of safety and tolerability.ResultsCompletion rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Discontinuation because of adverse events was significantly greater in the duloxetine (19.6%) vs. pregabalin group (10.4%; p = 0.04); no differences emerged between the duloxetine vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin (13.3%) groups (p = 0.19) or pregabalin vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin groups (p = 0.57). Adverse event rates varied: nausea, insomnia, hyperhidrosis and decreased appetite were reported significantly more often in patients treated with duloxetine vs. patients treated with pregabalin (each p ≤ 0.01); insomnia significantly more in patients treated with duloxetine vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin (p = 0.01); peripheral oedema significantly more in patients treated with pregabalin vs. duloxetine and duloxetine plus gabapentin (p ≤ 0.001 each) and nausea, hyperhidrosis, decreased appetite and vomiting significantly more in patients treated with duloxetine plus gabapentin vs. pregabalin (each p ≤ 0.05). At end-point, weight change differed significantly among treatment groups: patients in the pregabalin group on average gained weight (1.0 ± 0.04 kg); while, patients in the duloxetine and duloxetine plus gabapentin groups on average lost weight (−2.39 ± 0.04 and −1.06 ± 0.04 kg, respectively) (pregabalin vs. duloxetine, p ≤ 0.001; pregabalin vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin, p ≤ 0.001; duloxetine vs. duloxetine plus gabapentin, p = 0.01).Conclusion Duloxetine, pregabalin and duloxetine plus gabapentin were generally safe and tolerable for the treatment of DPNP.
    International Journal of Clinical Practice 05/2014; 68(9). DOI:10.1111/ijcp.12452 · 2.54 Impact Factor