Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma: the evolving landscape.

The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3624, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Neuro-Oncology (Impact Factor: 5.29). 03/2011; 13(3):353-61. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq203
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To review the strengths and weaknesses of primary and auxiliary end points for clinical trials among patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). Recent advances in outcome for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG, coupled with the development of multiple promising therapeutics with myriad antitumor actions, have led to significant growth in the number of clinical trials for patients with HGG. Appropriate clinical trial design and the incorporation of optimal end points are imperative to efficiently and effectively evaluate such agents and continue to advance outcome. Growing recognition of limitations weakening the reliability of traditional clinical trial primary end points has generated increasing uncertainty of how best to evaluate promising therapeutics for patients with HGG. The phenomena of pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse have made imaging-based end points, including overall radiographic response and progression-free survival, problematic. Although overall survival is considered the "gold-standard" end point, recently identified active salvage therapies such as bevacizumab may diminish the association between presalvage therapy and overall survival. Finally, advances in imaging as well as the assessment of patient function and well being have strengthened interest in auxiliary end points assessing these aspects of patient care and outcome. Better appreciation of the strengths and limitations of primary end points will lead to more effective clinical trial strategies. Technical advances in imaging as well as improved survival for patients with HGG support the further development of auxiliary end points evaluating novel imaging approaches as well as measures of patient function and well being.


Available from: Minesh P Mehta, Jun 10, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of review: Recent advances in survival for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent brain tumors, combined with the development of an ever-increasing number of potential treatments, has led to significant growth in the number of clinical trials for patients with brain tumors. Suitable clinical trial design and endpoints are vital for successfully evaluating these new treatments that may continue to improve outcome. However, inadequacies of clinical trial endpoints have challenged how best to evaluate promising new therapeutics. Recent findings: Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse confound imaging-based endpoints, including overall radiographic response and progression-free survival. Overall survival is still regarded as the definitive endpoint, but recently identified active salvage agents such as bevacizumab may diminish the association between presalvage therapy and overall survival, making interpretation of clinical trial results difficult. Novel imaging and the assessment of patient function, quality of life (QOL), and cognition are more frequently employed as endpoints. Summary: An awareness of the benefits and imperfections of clinical trial endpoints will lead to improved clinical trial design and results. Validated endpoints of patient function, QOL, and cognition are available and increasingly valued as secondary endpoints.
    Current Opinion in Neurology 01/2012; 25(6):780-785. DOI:10.1097/WCO.0b013e328359b45e · 5.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since 1990, the primary criteria used for assessing response to therapy in high-grade gliomas were those developed by Macdonald and colleagues, which incorporated 2-dimensional area measurements of contrast-enhancing tumor regions, corticosteroid dosing, and clinical assessment to arrive at a designation of response, stable disease, or progression. Recent advances in imaging technology and targeted therapeutics, however, have exposed limitations of the Macdonald criteria and have highlighted the need for reevaluation of response assessment criteria. In 2010, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group published updated criteria to address this need and to standardize response assessment for high-grade gliomas. In 2009, prior to the publication of the RANO criteria, the randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 AVAglio trial was designed and initiated to investigate the effectiveness of radiotherapy and temozolomide with or without bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The AVAglio protocol enacted specific measures to adapt the Macdonald criteria to the frontline treatment setting and to antiangiogenic agent evaluation, including the incorporation of a T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery component, qualitative assessment of irregularly shaped contrast-enhancing lesions, and a decision tree for confirming or ruling out pseudoprogression. Moreover, the protocol outlines practical means by which these adapted response criteria can be implemented in the clinic. This article describes the evolution of radiographic response criteria for high-grade gliomas and highlights the similarities and differences between those implemented in the AVAglio study and those subsequently published by RANO.
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 05/2013; 13(5):347. DOI:10.1007/s11910-013-0347-2 · 3.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glioma is the most common brain malignancy and has a very poor prognosis. The current treatment options have a minimal benefit on prolonging patient survival time. Accumulating data have shown that the WNT signaling pathway has a critical function in the progression and invasion of glioma. Thus, targeting WNT signaling appears to be an effective anti‑glioma strategy. TIKI2 was recently found to suppress the activation of the WNT signaling pathway by post‑translationally modifying secreted WNT proteins. The implication of TIKI2 aberrance in cancers and its potential therapeutic effect, however, has not been studied. In the present study, a glioma‑specific adenoviral vector was constructed, which was regulated by response elements of miR‑124, to express TIKI2 in glioma cells (Ad‑TIKI2‑124). Ad‑TIKI2‑124 was found to potently suppress the activation of WNT signaling in glioma cells. This inhibitory effect on the WNT signaling pathway lead to the reduction in proliferation, colony formation ability and invasion of glioma cell lines. In addition, animal experiments confirmed that the expression of the Ad‑TIKI2‑124 construct could compromise the tumorigenicity of glioma cells in vivo. Furthermore, this glioma‑selective TIKI2 expression protected normal cells from toxicity. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that adenovirus‑mediated TIKI2 therapy may be used for glioma treatment and therefore warrants further clinical studies.
    Molecular Medicine Reports 07/2014; 10(4). DOI:10.3892/mmr.2014.2412 · 1.48 Impact Factor