Early Reexploration for Suspected Thrombosis After Pancreas Transplantation

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Transplantation (Impact Factor: 3.78). 02/2011; 91(8):902-7. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182106069
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Graft thrombosis is the most common cause of early graft loss after pancreas transplantation. Early reexploration may permit salvage or timely removal of the thrombosed graft.
This was a retrospective review of 345 pancreas transplants performed at a single center between January 2003 and December 2009. Early reexploration was defined as within 1 week of pancreas transplantation.
Of the 345 transplants, there were 35 early reexplorations. The graft was compromised in 20 cases (57%): 10 venous thromboses, 3 arterial thromboses, 2 combined arterial and venous thrombosis, 2 thromboses secondary to allograft pancreatitis, and 3 cases of positional ischemia without thrombosis. Of these allografts, three reperfused once repositioned and six were successfully thrombectomized for a graft salvage rate of 45%. One of the thrombectomized grafts remained perfused but never functioned and was removed at retransplantation. The 10 remaining compromised grafts that were deemed unsalvageable and required allograft pancreatectomy. Nine of these recipients were retransplanted (eight within 2 weeks) and one was not a retransplantation candidate.
Reexploration for suspected graft thrombosis after pancreas transplantation resulted in a negative laparotomy rate of 43%, but permitted graft salvage in 45% of compromised grafts.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pancreas retransplantation, excluding immediate retransplantation for graft thrombosis, is a technically treacherous operation with the added challenges of adhesions from the prior transplant and difficulties identifying usable recipient vessels. The goal of this study was to review our single center experience with late pancreas retransplantation. Charts for all pancreas transplant recipients between 01/2003 and 04/2013 were reviewed for demographics, graft and patient survival, length of stay (LOS), readmissions and technical complications. Out of 473 pancreas transplants, there were 20 late pancreas retransplants compared to 441 first transplants. There were no significant differences in donor or recipient demographics. There was no significant difference in graft or patient survival. The mean and median lengths of stay were 22 and 9 days respectively (range 5-175 days) and 11 recipients required readmission within the first 3 months post-transplant. Five patients were reexplored in the early postoperative period for an enteric leak at the site of the primary allograft (n=1), complications of percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement (n=1), Hemorrhage (n=1), and negative laparotomy for hyperglycemia (n=2). Pancreas retransplantation is technically challenging but can be safely performed with graft and recipient survival comparable to primary transplants.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Transplantation 10/2014; 29(1). DOI:10.1111/ctr.12468 · 1.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction. Vascular thrombosis is an important cause of pancreatic graft loss, and the vast majority is managed using graft pancreatectomy. There are limited reports and case series of successful salvage of the pancreas allograft. We describe a case of partial pancreatic allograft thrombosis presenting as ruptured pancreatic cyst successfully salvaged using a graft distal pancreatectomy. Methods. We used descriptive retrospective analysis. Results. A 29-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal failure underwent a simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation with immediate graft function. The cadaveric pancreas allograft was placed head up in the right iliac fossa with enteric exocrine drainage and standard vascular anastomosis. He presented with compressive symptoms on his bladder 5 months later, and a computed tomography (CT) showed a 4-cm cystic lesion in the body and tail of the pancreas allograft. Spontaneous rupture of the cyst occurred 3 weeks after the initial onset of symptoms with generalized abdominal pain. He underwent graft distal pancreatectomy with good recovery. He remains euglycemic, insulin-free with a normal renal function. Histology of the resected unhealthy graft showed an arterial thrombus with xanthogranulomatous inflammation and necrosis. Conclusion. Surgical salvage with graft distal pancreatectomy is feasible for partial pancreatic allograft thrombosis. Cystic lesion in the pancreas is a possible presentation of vascular thrombosis.
    Transplantation Proceedings 07/2014; 46(6):2019-22. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.05.082 · 0.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ninety-eight percent of the whole pancreas does not serve the purpose of pancreatic transplantation and it is a major cause of surgical complications. Up to 30% of pancreas transplant recipients experience surgical complications and require reoperation. Graft thrombosis and pancreatitis are the most common complications of pancreas transplantation (PT). Thus, different surgical techniques have been described to overcome the surgical hurdles and reduce surgical complications. In this study, for the first time, we report short- and long-term outcomes of PT with inferior vena cava (IVC) venous drainage. Forty-five PTs (22 simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK] transplantations and 23 pancreas after kidney [PAK] transplantations) were performed with this technique in our center. Sixty-eight percent of the donors were imported from outside of our area after they were declined by their local transplantation center. Patient and graft survival rates were 100% at 1 year. No graft thrombosis or pancreatitis occurred with this technique. Six patients (13.3%) required reoperation (3 bleeding, 2 anastomotic leak, and 1 small bowel perforation). No patient or graft loss occurred due to surgical complications. We conclude that this technique provides fast and easy dissection of the venous drainage of the PT without the need of complete occlusion of venous outflow. Surgical complication rates were lower with this technique compared with other reported techniques.
    Transplantation Proceedings 07/2014; 46(6):1900-4. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.06.043 · 0.95 Impact Factor


Available from
Nov 28, 2014