Article

What you cannot see can help you: the effect of exposure to unreportable stimuli on approach behavior.

Derner Institute, Adelphi University, Box 701, Garden City, NY 11530, United States.
Consciousness and Cognition (Impact Factor: 2.31). 02/2011; 20(2):173-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We examined effects of exposure to unreportable images of spiders on approach towards a tarantula. Pretests revealed awareness of the stimuli was at chance. Participants high or low (top and bottom 15%) on fear of spiders were randomly assigned to receive computer-generated exposure to unreportable pictures of spiders or outdoor scenes. They then engaged in a Behavioral Approach Task (BAT) with a live tarantula. Non-fearful participants completed more BAT items than spider-fearful individuals. Additionally, as predicted, a significant interaction (F(1,48)=5.12, p<.03) between fear of spiders and stimulus demonstrated that spider-fearful participants exposed to spiders completed more BAT items than spider-fearful participants exposed to control stimuli (but not as many as non-fearful participants). The findings support the hypothesis that exposure to unreportable feared stimuli promotes approach towards the feared object. Future research and clinical implications were discussed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
119 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article introduces and comments on the research presented in 2010 and subsequently written up in the papers in this section. The researchers attempt to bridge the fields of social cognitive neuroscience, psychoanalysis, and neurology. Since the reported research is in progress, the emphasis here is on conveying how research questions are addressed and how studies are designed to integrate information from these fields.
    Neuropsychoanalysis: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences. 01/2014; 14(2):187-193.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a neuropsychoanalytic experimental paradigm for demonstrating psychodynamic conflict. The strategy is threefold: to manipulate awareness of emotional stimuli that activate the psychodynamics of participants diagnosed with a pertinent psychological disorder; to compare their neurobiological vs. experiential responses to those of healthy participants; and to correlate the former patterns of neural activation of the diagnostic sample with attending patterns of behavior that are indicative of conflict. Behavioral experiments based on the paradigm have generated findings that are consistent with a theory of psychodynamic conflict. An ongoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study is comparing the scans of phobic, counterphobic, and healthy participants during exposure to masked and unmasked phobic stimuli. If the predicted patterns of neural activation of the phobic groups correlate with corresponding patterns of behavior, it will link brain and behavior in the demonstration of psychodynamic conflict.
    Neuropsychoanalysis: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences. 01/2014; 14(2):219-228.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study tested the hypothesis that an immediate effect of exposure to masked phobic stimuli on avoidance of the corresponding feared object would be maintained 1 year later. Fifty-three spider-phobic participants were identified with a questionnaire and a Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT) with a live tarantula. One week later, they were administered 1 of 3 types of exposure: very brief (25-ms, masked) or clearly visible (125-ms, unmasked) images of spiders, or very brief images of flowers. They engaged in the BAT again immediately thereafter. One year later, they returned for a follow-up BAT. The immediate effect of exposure to very brief spiders on reducing avoidance of the tarantula was still evident 1 year later. Endurance of an effect by masked stimuli of this duration has not been reported before. Potential theoretical implications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
    Emotion 03/2013; · 3.88 Impact Factor