Article

Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet 02/2010; 93 Suppl 2:S74-80.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine predictive factors for residual disease in uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III).
Medical records of patients who underwent LLETZ with CIN III between September 1, 1992 and December 31, 2001 in Ramathibodi Hospital were reviewed. Demographic data, colposcopic findings, and pathologic parameters were analyzed to identify the predictive factors for residual disease in uterine cervix.
The total of 541 cases were enrolled in this study. Managements after LLETZ are 1) repeated LLETZ, 2) hysterectomy, and 3) Papanicolaou smear. Residual disease was detected in a total of 156 patients (28.84%), there were 21 cases of CIN I (13.46%), 22 cases of CIN II (14.10%), 107 cases of CIN III (68.59%), and 6 (3.85%) cases of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of cervix. 1) Age > or = 50 years old was significant factor associated with residual disease. The incidence of residual disease was 50.00%. 2) Unsatisfactory colposcopy was significant factor associated with residual disease with 38.44% incidence of residual disease. 3) Margins involvement of LLETZ specimen was the only pathological predictive factor identified. The incidence of residual disease with clear margin, endocervical margin, ectocervical margin, and both margins involvement were 14.74, 52.63, 57.14, and 74.19% respectively. Other parameters, including gravidity, parity, menopausal status, cervical gland involvement, and number of quadrants involvement were not predictive of residual disease.
1) Age > or = 50 years old, 2) unsatisfactory colposcopy, and 3) margins involvement of LLETZ specimens were the predictive factors for residual disease in uterine cervix.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
88 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) with contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) in management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with respect to number of specimens obtained, weight of specimen, surgical margin, treatment time, and morbidity associated with those procedures. Women were randomly allocated to receive LLETZ or C-LETZ. Inclusion criteria were the following circumstances: (1) presence of biopsy-proved CIN 2/3, (2) persistent biopsy-proved CIN 1, (3) discrepancy between cytology and histology, or 4) an endocervical curettage was positive. Ninety-eight women were eligible for the study. Mean weight of specimens in C-LETZ group was significantly more than LLETZ group (4.35 ± 1.39 vs. 3.55 ± 1.48 g, p = 0.007). Duration of treatment were similar in both groups (p = 0.39). After multiple logistic regressions were analyzed, C-LETZ was more likely to result in a single pathologic specimen (76 vs. 29.16 %, p < 0.001; adjusted RR 8.33, CI 3.23-21.47). There was no statistical significant difference in the frequency of positive margins between the groups (40 vs. 39.5 %, p = 0.64; adjusted RR 1.27, CI 0.46-3.50). The morbidity associated with those procedures was not different between the two groups. C-LETZ has a clear clinical benefit in term of a higher rate of a single pathologic specimen. It removes more cervical tissue than LLETZ. The incidence of incomplete excision and complication seem to be similar in both groups.
    Archives of Gynecology 06/2012; 286(5):1173-9. · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identify predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ (CIS) at hysterectomy following cervical conizations with CIS and positive margins or endocervical curettage (ECC) or microinvasive cervical cancer. Patients with cervical conization with CIS and positive margins, ECC or microinvasive carcinoma who underwent hysterectomy within 6months of conization were identified. Conization and hysterectomy specimens were re-reviewed to assess volume of disease, ECC and margin status and residual carcinoma. Standard statistical tests were used. 83 patients were included. 34 (41%) had residual carcinoma in the hysterectomy specimen: 23 CIS, 9 microinvasive, 2 invasive disease. In patients with squamous histology predictors of residual disease included a positive ECC (p=0.04), combined endocervical margin and ECC (69% if both positive, 38% either positive, 11% if both negative, p=0.01) and volume of disease≥50% (p=0.01). In patients with glandular histology no factor predicted residual disease. Type of conization, > 2 involved quadrants, and presence of microinvasion in the conization specimen did not predict residual disease. No patient with squamous histology had>Stage IA1 disease at hysterectomy, whereas 2 (2.4%) with adenocarcinoma had>Stage IA1 disease at hysterectomy. Residual carcinoma or CIS is present in nearly half of hysterectomies after conization with CIS and positive ECC, margins or microinvasion. Patients with squamous histology may not require repeat conization prior to definitive therapy. No factors predict residual disease with adenocarcinoma. In women with AIS with negative margins and ECC and no microinvasion, it appears reasonable to proceed with simple hysterectomy.
    Gynecologic Oncology 11/2013; · 3.93 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads
Available from