Large breast size as a risk factor for late adverse effects of breast radiotherapy: Is residual dose inhomogeneity, despite 3D treatment planning and delivery, the main explanation?

Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Radiotherapy and Oncology (Impact Factor: 4.36). 02/2011; 100(2):236-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.012
Source: PubMed


Large breast size is associated with an increased risk of late adverse effects after breast conservation surgery and radiotherapy, even when 3D dosimetry is used. The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that residual dose inhomogeneity is sufficient to explain the association.
Patients previously treated after breast conservation surgery with whole breast radiotherapy using 3D dosimetry and followed up in the UK FAST hypofractionation trial were selected for this analysis. The residual level of dose inhomogeneity across the whole breast treatment volume was used to test for association between residual dosimetry and post-treatment change in breast appearance at 2 years post-radiotherapy.
At 2 years, 201/279 (72%) of women had no change in photographic breast appearance, 61 (22%) had mild change and 17 (6%) had marked change. Breast size and dosimetry were both significantly associated with late effects in univariate analyses, but only breast size remained an independent significant risk factor for change in breast appearance when included in a multiple regression model together with other prognostic factors (p=0.006 for trend).
Large-breasted women are more likely to suffer change in breast size and shape after whole breast radiotherapy delivered using 3D dosimetry, but residual dose inhomogeneity is insufficient to explain the association.

Download full-text


Available from: Mark A Sydenham, Sep 29, 2015
44 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concept of radiation dose-volume effect has been exploited in breast cancer as boost treatment for high risk patients and more recently in trials of Partial Breast Irradiation for low risk patients. However, there appears to be paucity of published data on the dose-volume effect of irradiation on breast tissue including the recently published report on Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC). This systematic review looks at the current literature for relationship between irradiated breast volume and normal tissue complications and introduces the concept of dose modulation.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 06/2012; 104(1):1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.04.025 · 4.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Linear quadratic models predict that hypofractionation increases the biological effect of physical dose inhomogeneity. The clinical significance of this effect was tested retrospectively in a trial of adjuvant breast hypofractionation. The UK FAST trial randomised 915 women after breast conservation surgery between standard fractionation and two dose levels of a 5-fraction regimen delivering 5.7 or 6.0 Gy fractions in 5 weeks, using 3D dosimetry. Logistic regression tested for association between the absolute volumes receiving different isodose level >100% of prescribed dose (hotspots) and the risk of change in 2-year photographic breast appearance. The strength of this association was compared between control and hypofractionated groups. Three hundred and ninety datasets from 11 participating centres were available for analysis. At 2 years post-randomisation, 81 (20.8%) had mild change and 24 (6.2%) had marked change in photographic breast appearance. After adjusting for breast size and surgical deficit, there was no statistically significant association between the risk of 2-year change in breast appearance and dose inhomogeneity in either the control or hypofractionated schedules, according to the various definitions of hotspots analysed. The magnitude of the effect of dosimetry on 2-year change in breast appearance did not vary significantly between control and hypofractionated schedules for any of the dosimetry parameters (p>0.05 for all heterogeneity tests). Dose inhomogeneity had no greater impact on the risk of 2-year change in photographic breast appearance after hypofractionated breast radiotherapy than after standard fractionation.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 07/2012; 104(2):143-7. DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.06.002 · 4.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radiotherapy after breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer is reported to adversely affect the cosmetic outcome. The incidence of radiation-induced fibroatrophy is around 10% at 5 years. A better knowledge of its pathophysiology has revealed the essential role of activated fibroblasts and reactive oxygen species, mediated by TGF beta 1, allowing the development of antioxidant in the management of the established radiation-induced fibroatrophy. Cosmetic sequelae are evaluated with standardized scales, such as the LENT-SOMA and must be monitored during at least 5 years. The main factors determining the occurrence of sequelae are a large breast volume, dose heterogeneity and the use of tumour bed boost after whole-breast radiation therapy. Intensity modulated radiotherapy and partial breast irradiation position themselves as a good alternatives to reduce the incidence of late skin side effects. The use of predictive tests of intrinsic radiosensitivity might fit into the therapeutic strategy.
    Cancer/Radiothérapie 09/2012; 16(s 5–6):462–469. DOI:10.1016/j.canrad.2012.05.018 · 1.41 Impact Factor
Show more