Judgments about pain intensity and pain genuineness: the role of pain behavior and judgmental heuristics.

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 02/2011; 12(4):468-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.10.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The primary objective of the present study was to examine the relative importance of pain behaviors and judgmental heuristics (eg, gender stereotypes) in observers' inferences about pain intensity and pain genuineness. Participants (n = 90) observed video depictions of chronic pain patients performing a physically challenging task and were asked to make inferences of pain intensity and pain genuineness. Analyses indicated that observers relied on judgmental heuristics and pain behaviors both when making inferences about pain intensity and when making inferences about pain genuineness. Follow-up analyses, however, revealed that judgmental heuristics (eg, gender stereotypes) were significantly less utilized when observers made inferences about pain genuineness than when observers made inferences about pain intensity. When observers made inferences about pain genuineness, analyses indicated that patients' facial pain behaviors became the most important source of information. Taken together, these findings suggest that observers who are asked to make inferences about the genuineness of others' pain are likely to reduce their reliance on judgmental heuristics in favor of more controlled and thoughtful inferential processes characterized by detailed processing of behavioral information, particularly others' facial pain behaviors. PERSPECTIVE: The current study provides new insights into the processes that are involved in observers' inferences about pain intensity and pain genuineness. These inferences play an important role in treatment decisions and advances in this domain could ultimately contribute to more effective management of the challenges facing patients with pain-related disorders.

Download full-text


Available from: Pascal Thibault, Sep 18, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Professional judgments about persistent pain are influenced by contextual variables, which are features relating to the patient, the assessor, or the broader situation. Such judgments directly inform assessment and treatment and therefore represent an important area of research. While current formulations of persistent pain adopt a biopsychosocial framework, contextual variables relating to psychosocial information have not been well examined in the literature.DesignWe employed a within-subjects experimental vignette paradigm to investigate the influence of four contextual variables, 2 (medical evidence: present vs absent) × 2 (pain behavior: present vs absent) × 2 (referral to a psychologist: yes vs no) × 2 (responsibility: onset controllable vs onset uncontrollable), on perceptions of pain. Judgments about patients with chronic low back pain were made across several dimensions.SubjectsOne hundred sixteen medical and nursing students.ResultsMain findings revealed that identifiable pain pathology led to increased ratings of pain intensity and emotional distress, and decreased perceived likelihood of malingering. Pain behavior and referral to a psychologist were also found to increase ratings of pain intensity and emotional distress. Encouragingly, psychological referral was not found to increase the perceived likelihood of malingering. Responsibility for the initial injury was found to influence judgments, but this occurred in interaction with medical evidence as well as pain behavior.Conclusions These findings suggest that contextual variables have an important influence on medical and nursing students' perceptions of patients and their pain. Theoretical and practical implications for provider training and community education are discussed.
    Pain Medicine 10/2014; 16(1). DOI:10.1111/pme.12587 · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People with chronic musculoskeletal pain can experience pain-related fear of physical activity and low confidence in their own motor capabilities. These pain-related emotions and thoughts are often communicated through communicative and protective non-verbal behaviours. Studies in clinical psychology have shown that protective behaviours affect well-being not only physically and psychologically, but also socially. These behaviours appear to be used by others to appraise not just a person's physical state but also to make inferences about their personality traits, with protective pain-related behaviour more negatively evaluated than the communicative behaviour. Unfortunately, people with chronic pain may have difficulty in controlling the triggers of protective behaviour and often are not even aware they exhibit such behaviour. New sensing technology capable of detecting such behaviour or its triggers could be used to support rehabilitation in this regard. In this paper we briefly discuss the above issues and present our approach in developing a rehabilitation system.
    Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services (WIAMIS), 2013 14th International Workshop on; 01/2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Demographic characteristics have been found to influence pain management decisions, but limited focus has been placed on participants' reactions to feedback about their use of sex, race, or age to make these decisions. The present study aimed to examine the effects of providing feedback about demographic cue use to participants making pain decisions. Participants (n=107) viewed 32 virtual human (VH) patients with standardized levels of pain, and provided ratings for VHs' pain intensity and their treatment decisions. Real-time LENS model idiographic analyses determined participants' decision policies based on cues used. Participants were subsequently informed about cue use and completed feedback questions. Frequency analyses were conducted on responses to these questions. Between 7.4%-89.4% of participants indicated awareness of their demographic or pain expression cue use. Of those individuals, 26.9%-55.5% believed this awareness would change their future clinical decisions, and 66.6%-75.9% endorsed that their attitudes affect their imagined clinical practice. Between 66.6%-79.1% of participants who used cues reported willingness to complete an online tutorial about pain across demographic groups. This study was novel because it provided participants feedback about their cue use. Most participants who used cues indicated willingness to complete in an online intervention, suggesting this technology's utility for modifying biases.
    Journal of Pain 08/2014; 15(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.08.001 · 4.22 Impact Factor