Dermatoscopy: Alternative uses in daily clinical practice

Dermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Impact Factor: 5). 02/2011; 64(6):1135-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.03.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Dermatoscopy, also known as dermoscopy, epiluminescence microscopy, or surface microscopy, is a noninvasive technique allowing rapid and magnified (× 10) in vivo observation of the skin with the visualization of morphologic features often imperceptible to the naked eye. Videodermatoscopy (VD) represents the evolution of dermatoscopy and is performed with a video camera equipped with lenses providing higher magnification (× 10 to × 1000). Over the past few years, both dermatoscopy and VD have been demonstrated to be useful in a wide variety of cutaneous disorders, including ectoparasitic infestations, cutaneous/mucosal infections, hair and nail abnormalities, psoriasis, and other dermatologic as well as cosmetologic conditions. Depending on the skin disorder, both dermatoscopy and VD may be useful for differential diagnosis, prognostic evaluation, and monitoring response to treatment. Nowadays, it represents an important and relatively simple aid in daily clinical practice.

Download full-text


Available from: Francesco Lacarrubba, Aug 12, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in non-invasive imaging techniques in clinical and investigational dermatology. Besides the growing number of biophysical methods for the assessment of skin properties, novel imaging tools have emerged and classical imaging methods are substantially improved. Areas covered: This review focuses on well established and some of the most promising imaging techniques for application in dermatology and cutaneous research. These comprise dermoscopy, sonography, confocal microscopy, multiphoton tomography and optical coherence tomography. Non-invasive imaging techniques are presented concerning their functional principles, the history of their development and their current clinical and research application. Advantages and limitations of each of the methods are discussed. Expert opinion: Available non-invasive imaging techniques in dermatology show substantial differences concerning their limitations and opportunities, potential clinical applicability and practicability. Also, the current data available differ largely between these methods due to different levels of experience in research and clinical application. Future research will not only aim at improving current technical limitations, but also investigate the potential synergistic effects of combining two or more techniques in order to enhance their diagnostic impact.
    Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics 09/2011; 5(5):425-40. DOI:10.1517/17530059.2011.599064
  • European journal of dermatology: EJD 12/2011; 22(1):143-4. DOI:10.1684/ejd.2011.1585 · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • Australasian Journal of Dermatology 02/2012; 53(1):e15. DOI:10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00872.x · 0.98 Impact Factor
Show more